AnotherRealOne

Same user as TheLastRealOne

hello

Hello, besides TheLastRealOne (talk · contribs), have you ever used a prior account on Wikipedia? Either way, the page you are currently editing, Gaza War, is subject to a 1 revert per 24 hour period. A "revert" is any edit that reverses another edit. You are currently edit-warring on that article and will likely be blocked if you do not stop. If you have a problem with an edit please use the Talk:Gaza War page to discuss the edit. The edit you are making is currently the subject of such a discussion. If you would actually like to do something useful with your time I suggest you make your way to that discussion instead of continuously reverting the edit. Thanks, nableezy - 00:18, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

August 2010

To enforce an arbitration decision, you have been blocked for a period of 48 hours from editing . Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read our guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and follow the instructions there to appeal your block. T. Canens (talk) 00:22, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

---

Notice to administrators: In a 2010 decision, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cryptonio for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. T. Canens (talk) 03:25, 7 August 2010 (UTC)