User talk:Another Believer/Archive 25
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Another Believer. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 20 | ← | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | → | Archive 30 |
I'm not sure why you changed the images sizes here at List of Confederate monuments and memorials. The article already doesn't have enough room for its images. Why make them bigger? Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:13, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Magnolia677: I think the list looks much, much better now with consistent image sizing, but I don't own the page so edit away! :) ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:34, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
- I made the tall images upright to save space. The article is very image heavy, but the topic lends itself to this. I may resize some of the images. Cheers! Magnolia677 (talk) 13:13, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Magnolia677: I think the list needs a lot of work overall. There are many, many unsourced entries, and I think some tables would be helpful for organizing content and housing images. I am letting other editors worry about how content is displayed. Thanks for the note! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:08, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
- I made the tall images upright to save space. The article is very image heavy, but the topic lends itself to this. I may resize some of the images. Cheers! Magnolia677 (talk) 13:13, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Blackberry Castle
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 16:02, 4 August 2018 (UTC) |
Nomination of Verne Harnish for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
 The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Verne Harnish (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —МандичкаYO 😜 23:00, 4 August 2018 (UTC) |
Administrators' newsletter – August 2018
Extended content
|
|---|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2018). 
|
This week's article for improvement (week 32, 2018)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Category:Vandalized works of art in Washington (state) has been nominated for discussion
Resolved Category:Vandalized works of art in Washington (state), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Dennis Bratland (talk) 05:36, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Nei Lak Shan Angle Station for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nei Lak Shan Angle Station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jc86035 (talk) 17:53, 8 August 2018 (UTC) |
This Month in GLAM
This Month in GLAM: July 2018
Extended content
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
This Month in GLAM: August 2018
Extended content
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
This Month in GLAM: September 2018
Extended content
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
This Month in GLAM: October 2018
Extended content
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Extended content
|
|---|
 |
Extended content
|
|---|
|
|
This week's article for improvement (week 33, 2018)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Nomination of South Portland Historic District for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Portland Historic District until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Doncram (talk) 03:01, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
|
Capitol rotunda
Good day. I've added the rotunda link to the statuary hall template, and wondering if you would like to change the links in the rotunda page about the statues to the works themselves and not the presidents they represent. The statues seem to be the subject of the section and not the namesakes. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:45, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- Done. Linked and italiced the six, more might be hanging out in the section. Randy Kryn (talk) 19:56, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Jal Fazer
Don't think for one moment you're going to accomplish anything by undoing my edit to her page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.81.49.250 (talk) 15:13, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
- Mention of an aborted child does not belong in the infobox's family parameter. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:17, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
August GOCE newsletter
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:25, 15 August 2018 (UTC) |
This week's article for improvement (week 34, 2018)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
MAX Blue Line
Not sure how to get started on peer review as the pages I've been looking at seem to have low traffic. Do you think we can get the ball rolling on a few folks peer reviewing the MAX Blue Line article? And then possibly push it towards GA nomination? --Truflip99 (talk) 02:54, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- @SJ Morg and SounderBruce: You two come to mind re: transportation content in the Pacific Northwest. Are either of you willing to take a look at the MAX Blue Line article? ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:58, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Truflip99: I've pinged two editors above, and I'm also nominating the article for a copy edit by the Guild of Copy Editors. You might consider posting a request for feedback at WP Trains and/or WP Oregon, and then nominate for Good article status as soon as you're comfortable. ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:23, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 29
Extended content
|
|---|
|
 Books & Bytes
Hindi, Italian and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta! Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 25 August 2018 (UTC) |
September 2018 at Women in Red
Extended content
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This week's article for improvement (week 35, 2018)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
The Signpost: 30 August 2018
Extended content
|
|---|
|
WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 12
Extended content
|
|---|
 Newsletter • August 2018
This month: WikiProject X: The resumption Work has resumed on WikiProject X and CollaborationKit, backed by a successfully funded Project Grant. For more information on the current status and planned work, please see this month's issue of the newsletter! |
Invitation to participate in study
Hello,
I am E. Whittaker, I am working with Wikimedia’s Scoring Team to create a labeled dataset, and potentially a tool, to help editors deal with incivility when they encounter it on talk pages. A full write-up of the study can be found here: m:Research:Civil_Behavior_Interviews. We are currently recruiting editors to be interviewed about their experiences with incivility on talk pages. Would you be interested in being interviewed? I am contacting you because of your involvement in Wikipedia’s Women in Red project. The interviews should take ~1 hour, and will be conducted over BlueJeans (which does allow interviews to be recorded). If, so, please email me at ewhit@umich.edu in order to schedule an interview.
Thank you Ewitch51 (talk) 19:28, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
WikiCup 2018
WikiCup 2018 September newsletter
Extended content
|
|---|
|
The fourth round of the 2018 WikiCup has now come to an end. The eight users who made it to the final round had to score a minimum of 422 points to qualify, with the top score in the round being 4869 points. The leaders in round 4 were:
During round four, 6 featured articles and 164 good articles were promoted by WikiCup contestants, 13 articles were included in good topics and 143 good article reviews were performed. There were also 10 "in the news" contributions on the main page and 53 "did you knows". Congratulations to all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck, and let the best editor win! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:30, 1 September 2018 (UTC) |
WikiCup 2018 November newsletter
Extended content
|
|---|
|
The WikiCup is over for another year! Our Champion this year is
Awards will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient! Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved much this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition. Next year's competition begins on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; it is open to all Wikipedians, new and old. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2019 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email) and Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs · email). |
Administrators' newsletter – September 2018
Extended content
|
|---|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2018).
|
This week's article for improvement (week 36, 2018)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Featured article nomination of "San Junipero"
Since you're familiar with the FA process and have worked on Black Mirror articles before, I thought you might be interested in reviewing my FA nomination of "San Junipero", which can be found here. If you're not interested or don't have time, don't worry – I won't be offended if you ignore or delete this message. — Bilorv(c)(talk) 21:53, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Bilorv: Thanks for the message. I do not complete GA or FA reviews, but hopefully someone else will do so soon. ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:59, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
 | Hello, Another Believer. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for MAX Blue Line at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 03:01, 11 September 2018 (UTC)) |
- @Baffle gab1978: Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:46, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 37, 2018)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
Hello, Another Believer. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, 2020 Summer Olympics closing ceremony, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway. You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. signed, Rosguilltalk 23:42, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
|
National Statuary Hall
I haven’t finished with categories on the people (as opposed to the art works). Turns out to be a bigger task than I thought. Give me a few days. deisenbe (talk) 11:09, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Deisenbe: Sounds good. I have to admit, I'm not sure these newly-created NSH-related categories will be kept long term but I suppose there's no harm in trying. ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:11, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 38, 2018)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Coins
It's just easier to do the part from books first for a few issues and then do the online parts later.--Wehwalt (talk) 21:03, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Wehwalt: Do whatever works for you! I just enjoy helping out where I think I can, and reading your work. ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:41, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you for doing that and saying that.--Wehwalt (talk) 21:59, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
DYK for I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration
On 20 September 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that The New York Times published the anonymous essay "I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration" despite its history of publishing few such essays? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Public art/FOP/copyright
I see you noticed Straight Shot. What's your take on copyright for this? I'm not sure whether a row of stones qualifies but maybe it does?? ☆ Bri (talk) 15:32, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Bri: Honestly? I don't worry too much about copyright. If images at Wikimedia Commons are nominated for deletion, then I try to save the file then upload under fair use here at English Wikipedia. I've had images of contemporary artworks deleted, and I've also had them kept for lack of copyright evidence or because the artwork is not the primary focus of the image. In other words, there's gray area, so I just plug away and then see what happens. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:35, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Statue notability
Do you think the Rachel Carson statue in Woods Hole, Massachusetts would meet notability requirements? [1] If so, I have a picture I can upload. Thsmi002 (talk) 15:45, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Thsmi002: I did not complete a thorough assessment, but based on a quick Google search, I'd say a stub would be appropriate for future expansion (source, source, source, etc). I say be bold! :) ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:55, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- Done! Rachel Carson (sculpture) And someone had already uploaded an image, plus NOAA has several that I may add later. Thanks for your thoughts. Thsmi002 (talk) 18:38, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Thsmi002: Wonderful! Looks great, and thanks for creating a new article. ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:01, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- Done! Rachel Carson (sculpture) And someone had already uploaded an image, plus NOAA has several that I may add later. Thanks for your thoughts. Thsmi002 (talk) 18:38, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Reverting Redirects of Family Guy episodes
Hello, I am curious what was the reasoning of you reverting Chris Has Got a Date, Date, Date, Date, Date and Inside Family Guy back to full articles from redirects. Both of them had gone through the AFD process, and in both cases, the clear consensus was for Redirects (as seen at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Has Got a Date, Date, Date, Date, Date and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inside Family Guy. Both articles, after the close of the AFD had a problem with IPs ignoring the result and repeatedly restoring the articles, despite the efforts of other editors to restore them to redirects. As neither article had any significant changes to them made, and I saw nothing in either of their talk pages discussing that they should be restored as full articles, I assumed I was following proper procedure by restoring the redirects that were decided on at the AFDs. Was I missing something in the process that should have prevented me from doing so?
Thanks!169.232.162.112 (talk) 16:56, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you for creating a redirect at Wasted: Tales of a Gen-X Drunk.
I've created a new article.
I hope it's okay with you that I pointed that redirect to the new article, at Wasted: Tales of a GenX Drunk.
Let me know what you think, about the new article, Wasted: Tales of a GenX Drunk ?
Thank you,
Sagecandor (talk) 21:55, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Sagecandor: Thanks for the heads up, and for creating a new article! ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:13, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
- You're welcome! Do you think Wasted: Tales of a GenX Drunk, will remain on Wikipedia ? Sagecandor (talk) 22:14, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Sagecandor: Given there are 50+ inline citations, I'd assume so. ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:14, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
- Okay, thank you for your analysis, I hope you are correct ! Sagecandor (talk) 22:18, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Sagecandor: Me, too! Also, I hope you continue creating new book articles and revisiting the Trump ones you worked on before. Keep up the great work! ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:19, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you, I really appreciate your encouragement, it's a breath of fresh air ! Wikipedia needs more editors like yourself that comport themselves with civility and kindness ! Sagecandor (talk) 22:21, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Sagecandor: Me, too! Also, I hope you continue creating new book articles and revisiting the Trump ones you worked on before. Keep up the great work! ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:19, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
- Okay, thank you for your analysis, I hope you are correct ! Sagecandor (talk) 22:18, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Sagecandor: Given there are 50+ inline citations, I'd assume so. ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:14, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
- You're welcome! Do you think Wasted: Tales of a GenX Drunk, will remain on Wikipedia ? Sagecandor (talk) 22:14, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Removing speedy deletion tags
Regardless of whether it no longer applies or not, you do remember/realise you're not supposed to remove speedy deletion tags from pages or articles you created, right? WP:CSD: "The creator of a page may not remove a speedy deletion tag from it." Ss112 03:08, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Sure, just trying not to waste editor time since the tag no longer applied. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:48, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 39, 2018)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Dilly Dilly listed at Redirects for discussion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dilly Dilly. Since you had some involvement with the Dilly Dilly redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:23, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
|
October 2018 at Women in Red
Extended content
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Extended content
|
|---|
|
|
Extended content
|
|---|
|
|
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
 The article Staten Island Ferry Disaster Memorial Museum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing |
This week's article for improvement (week 40, 2018)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
The Signpost: 1 October 2018
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Dilly Dilly article
I've gone ahead and added the references to the list of ads. It will be helpful given that the web ads are only supported there. Thanks for tagging on that. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:21, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- @AngusWOOF: Thanks for the note, and for your work on the article. ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:22, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Hi. I have reverted an edit of yours on this article, and would like to remind you about WP:BRD. When your Bold edit has been Reverted by another editor, the recommended next step, if you continue to think the edit is necessary, is to Discuss the dispute on the article talk page with other editors, but not to re-revert it, which is the first step to edit warring, a disruptive activity which is not allowed. Discussion on the talk page is the only way we have of reaching consensus, which is central to resolving editing disputes in an amicable and collegial manner, which is why communicating your concerns to your fellow editors is essential. While the discussion is going on, the article generally should remain in the status quo ante until the consensus as to what to do is reached. Your restoration of your edits without discussion has been reverted. I am awaiting your explanation for the changes you wish to make on the talk page, and will respond to you there. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:41, 2 October 2018 (UTC) |
- Great, thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:41, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Stanford art
I note you seem to be adding a lot of stubs for public art at Stanford University. Given there are dozens of pieces and you don't have pictures for most, I suggest a list type article (e.g., Public art at Stanford University). Leaving individual articles only for the most important. --Erp (talk) 06:34, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Erp: I'm not opposed to a list, but I visited the campus recently and have photographs to upload for many of the stubs I've created. I hope to flesh some of the stubs out more, but first I'm just trying to get the ball rolling. ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:08, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
I don't understand this article. Title and content are out of sync, and we don't usually have articles on individual artworks. They might be slightly notable as a pair as the source discusses; but a better title would be needed, and probably more sources. Dicklyon (talk) 03:42, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
- I corrected the name of the subject in the lead (forgot to update during my copy and paste). There are numerous Wikipedia articles about individual artworks -- I've created hundreds myself. ---Another Believer (Talk) 03:59, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
- OK, possibly sculptures such as these are notable. But the refs you put in support of the lead do not refer to the sculptures as being named that way; they say "sculptures of Louis Agassiz and ..." and such. Are there sources that treat the sculpture as being itself named "Louis Agassiz"? If not, why not title the article "Louis Agassiz sculpture" or something like that? Dicklyon (talk) 01:46, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Dicklyon: I'm not opposed to other titles. In terms of consistency, I've noticed many US sculpture articles are called "subject (sculpture)" or "subject (artist's last name)", while UK sculpture articles are more along the lines of "Statue of subject". Often there are inscriptions on the sculpture (or base or plaque) of the subject's name, so these are accepted as artwork names. ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:59, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
- Seems odd. Shall we ask at WT:AT? Dicklyon (talk) 04:31, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Dicklyon: Go for it! ---Another Believer (Talk) 04:45, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Dicklyon: Thanks for staring a discussion. I have no idea what the solutions are, if any, but I'm glad PamD has at least shared observations similar to what I've described. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:35, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
- Seems odd. Shall we ask at WT:AT? Dicklyon (talk) 04:31, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Dicklyon: I'm not opposed to other titles. In terms of consistency, I've noticed many US sculpture articles are called "subject (sculpture)" or "subject (artist's last name)", while UK sculpture articles are more along the lines of "Statue of subject". Often there are inscriptions on the sculpture (or base or plaque) of the subject's name, so these are accepted as artwork names. ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:59, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
- OK, possibly sculptures such as these are notable. But the refs you put in support of the lead do not refer to the sculptures as being named that way; they say "sculptures of Louis Agassiz and ..." and such. Are there sources that treat the sculpture as being itself named "Louis Agassiz"? If not, why not title the article "Louis Agassiz sculpture" or something like that? Dicklyon (talk) 01:46, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – October 2018
Extended content
|
|---|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2018).
|
Thank you
...for your thank you. I look forward to improving content in the Visual arts project. You made me feel welcome. Best Regards, Barbara ✐ ✉ 23:02, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
- You're so welcome! ---Another Believer (Talk) 02:25, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 41, 2018)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
March for our Lives—Town Hall for Lives
I was reading the March for Our Lives article this morning and wondered who wrote it. Great article! The student organizers led the "Town Hall for our Lives" summer tour and are continuing to tour this fall. I know one of the co-founders of the Town Hall Project, so I wouldn't be able to contribute to a new article or expand March for our Lives. I hope someone continues to write about these courageous young activists.
- @MauraWen: Thanks! I worked on March for Our Lives Portland the most (which I also attended). I'm curious to see how this movement evolves. Also, I wouldn't let your COI prevent you from making constructive contributions to Wikipedia. Just disclose your connection and edit as neutrally as possible, seeking feedback from other editors where appropriate. ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:06, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Another Believer: Thanks! That's helpful. I have been reading (and enjoying) your articles. I am starting to contribute to the Wikipedia:The 50,000 Challenge and I always read the articles previous to my own. You must be from Portland, with all your Portland contributions. It's my son, Nathan, who is a co-founder of the Town Hall Project and works with the March for our Lives organizers. He lives in Portland, so I visit Portland as often as I can, although Nathan has been on the road quite a bit with the March for our Lives group. MauraWen (talk) 14:28, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
- @MauraWen: Wonderful! Yes, I've lived in Portland for nearly 10 years now. It's a wonderful city! :) ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:30, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Another Believer: Thanks! That's helpful. I have been reading (and enjoying) your articles. I am starting to contribute to the Wikipedia:The 50,000 Challenge and I always read the articles previous to my own. You must be from Portland, with all your Portland contributions. It's my son, Nathan, who is a co-founder of the Town Hall Project and works with the March for our Lives organizers. He lives in Portland, so I visit Portland as often as I can, although Nathan has been on the road quite a bit with the March for our Lives group. MauraWen (talk) 14:28, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
Location map for Lewis & Clark College
Doubtless this is on your watchlist, but I've added a location map for Lewis & Clark College - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AWikiProject_Oregon%2FGraphics&type=revision&diff=863780128&oldid=830299971 - which I hope works (bit rusty on the whole process). If you're still interested in these things, let me know if there are other areas for which maps would be handy.
Meanwhile this - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lewis_%26_Clark_College,_2017_-_47.jpg - is one of yours ... might you fancy using Acme Mapper to identify the coords - crosshair over the location, coords reported in the bottom right box - https://mapper.acme.com/?ll=45.45091,-122.66960&z=19 --Tagishsimon (talk) 00:18, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Tagishsimon: Wonderful!, thank you for the L&C map. Since you asked, and if you're willing, I'd love maps for the downtown cores of Eugene and Salem. The exiting maps of Eugene and Salem are super helpful, but some infoboxes could benefit from more specific maps of small areas. I will try to remember where I photographed the aforementioned statue. ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:00, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
- I'm sorry to say, I'm struggling to identify an exact location looking at maps. I will ping if I find the spot. In the meantime, thanks for adding coordinates to other Oregon articles recently. ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:03, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
- Not a problem. I'll see if I can find York: Terra Incognita. Happy to do Eugene & Salem downtowns, but give me some pointers, e.g. by way of road names, for the top & bottom, and the east & west of the desired boxes. No rush. thx --Tagishsimon (talk) 01:08, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
- also, York found - to the right in this image - https://www.google.com/maps/@45.4511532,-122.669716,3a,75y,151.53h,102.05t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sEvIq2xZsB116K8At-4kV0Q!2e0!7i13312!8i6656?hl=en - & so no longer incogneto. -Tagishsimon (talk) 01:16, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Tagishsimon: Great detective work! Thank you. ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:17, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
- also, York found - to the right in this image - https://www.google.com/maps/@45.4511532,-122.669716,3a,75y,151.53h,102.05t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sEvIq2xZsB116K8At-4kV0Q!2e0!7i13312!8i6656?hl=en - & so no longer incogneto. -Tagishsimon (talk) 01:16, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
Let me know if there are any issues with these. fwiw, I used Template:Geogroup on the Eugene and Salem categories, to visualise the coords of articles in the categories, in order to work out the bounds of their downtowns. And, as normal, let me know if you'd like any additions or amendments to maps. --Tagishsimon (talk) 01:36, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Bless your heart for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bless your heart until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. wumbolo ^^^ 20:44, 13 October 2018 (UTC) |
Get ready for November with Women in Red!
Extended content
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
This week's article for improvement (week 42, 2018)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Extended content
|
|---|
|
|
Extended content
|
|---|
|
|
Heaven South
I added content to Heaven South. Generally, the writer and producer don't need sources of their own, since that content is already verified on the album article (except in cases where there is conflicting information, and something authoritative like the ASCAP or BMI database is needed). One of the sources I added does corroborate the song's writers, but a citation on the producer is not necessary since the album article already verifies that information. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:01, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks, ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:08, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 43, 2018)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Boo!
Hello Another Believer:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!
– North America1000 15:37, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Women's March on Portland for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Women's March on Portland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. wumbolo ^^^ 10:25, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
|
Nomination of Peaceful Vancouver Freedom March for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peaceful Vancouver Freedom March until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. wumbolo ^^^ 10:32, 23 October 2018 (UTC) |
Books & Bytes, Issue 30
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Books & Bytes
French version of Books & Bytes is now available in meta! Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:42, 25 October 2018 (UTC) |
Nomination of The Sweetener Sessions for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sweetener Sessions until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --woodensuperman 08:25, 26 October 2018 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 28 October 2018
Extended content
|
|---|
|
This week's article for improvement (week 44, 2018)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Uploading Images from One IP Address
Hi Another Believer--
A colleague and I are going to have a Wikimedia Commons upload-a-thon as part of a presentation we are giving about Wikimedia Commons and how we use it. Do you know of any issues with folx uploading lots of photos at one time from one IP address? Let me know--thanks!
RachelWex
- @RachelWex: I don't, but there are editors more experienced with Commons than I am. @Fæ: Do you know of any issues here? ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:24, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Another Believer: The event went OK! We got everyone to create accounts and upload photos at one time. RachelWex (talk) 14:55, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- @RachelWex: Glad to hear! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:31, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Outdoor sculpture non-free file uploads
Extended content
|
|---|
|
|
Extended content
|
|---|
|
|
"Why Did You Do That?"
I'm working on the article so request you to please refrain from touching it for the time-being as its in {{in use}}. —IB [ Poke ] 15:20, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
- @IndianBio: Oh! I thought you were working on "Maybe It's Time". Sorry! I'll try not to step on your toes. :) ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:21, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Extended content
|
|---|
|
|
WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge award
|
The Red Maple Leaf Award | |
| This maple leaf is awarded to Another Believer for writing two articles about historic buildings in Victoria during the second year of The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 22:31, 2 November 2018 (UTC) |
- @Reidgreg: Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:32, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
- You're welcome! Feel free to list any other Canada-related articles you've created or substantially improved since November 2016. I only distribute awards once a year, but there's no deadline other than the 10,000 article improvement limit. – Reidgreg (talk) 22:37, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – November 2018
Extended content
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2018).
|
FAC: Forca Bruta
Hello. My featured-article nomination of Forca Bruta has stagnated. I noticed your name in an edit to an article on my watchlist, and would like to ask. Can you please leave comments or a review at the nomination page? Dan56 (talk) 23:02, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 01:09, 4 November 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Per recent changes you made to the article, which were reverted, you may be interested in this discussion. North America1000 01:09, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Why I alphabetized Template:Washington Park, Portland, Oregon the way I did
I figured that we should probably drop any initial "Washington Park"s and alphabetize by the first word that isn't Washington Park. Hence, I alphabetized the Washington Park MAX station as "MAX station". pbp 20:34, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Purplebackpack89: I understand, and I'd be more open to this form of sorting if the Wikipedia article were called "Washington Park MAX station", but I don't think sorting "Washington Park station" as "MAX station" is particularly helpful. ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:36, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Extended content
|
|---|
|
|
This week's article for improvement (week 45, 2018)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
November 2018
Extended content
|
|---|
|
|
DYK for Statue of Liberty (Seattle)
On 8 November 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Statue of Liberty (Seattle), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Seattle's replica of the Statue of Liberty stands at around five percent of the original's height? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Statue of Liberty (Seattle). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Statue of Liberty (Seattle)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Ten Commandments Monument (Austin, Texas)
Extended content
|
|---|
|
I really don't see what's wrong with including the fact that it's behind the Capitol building. The Confederate soldiers monument is in front of the building close to the entrance of the carriage drive, and so very prominently visible -- whereas the Ten Commandments monument, which the legislature didn't request or commission, but which was donated unsolicited by a private group (probably partly as kind of a disguised Cecil B. DeMille movie promotion) was tucked away behind the building... AnonMoos (talk) 08:51, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
|
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:03, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 46, 2018)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
,_2018.jpg){kind=link}
,_2018.jpg){kind=link}
,_2018.jpg){kind=link}
While editing Stanich randomly as I was reading the Dictionary of American Family Names, I found a Washington Post article about Stanich's, a burger parlor in Portland. Founded in 1949 and now closed down if Google is to be believed. Did it close down because it became too popular once it was honored with the "best burger in America" award from Thrillist? There are many more RS and I thought you might want to create it. Please ping me if you do. Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 04:10, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Zigzig20s: Interesting!, but I am not familiar with Stanich's. I've created several articles about restaurants in Portland, Oregon, but I tend to write about ones I've visited. ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:07, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Zigzig20s: I created a stub for Stanich's, too. ---Another Believer (Talk) 02:06, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you!Zigzig20s (talk) 02:14, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Speaking of Oregon, the Bend Simpson Pavilion may be notable?Zigzig20s (talk) 00:44, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Zigzig20s: Possibly? You might consider posting questions like these on WikiProject talk pages. Other people at WikiProject Oregon, for example, might know. ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:47, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- I was trying to be nice. Never mind.Zigzig20s (talk) 00:51, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Zigzig20s: Sorry, I thought you were asking if I knew whether or not the pavilion was notable? I was just confirming I'm not familiar. I meant no offense! ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:55, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- I thought you might want to work on it together.Zigzig20s (talk) 00:56, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Zigzig20s: I am focused on other articles currently, but I created a quick stub at Simpson Pavilion if you have a few minutes to expand a bit more. ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:20, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 01:35, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Zigzig20s: I am focused on other articles currently, but I created a quick stub at Simpson Pavilion if you have a few minutes to expand a bit more. ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:20, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- I thought you might want to work on it together.Zigzig20s (talk) 00:56, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Zigzig20s: Sorry, I thought you were asking if I knew whether or not the pavilion was notable? I was just confirming I'm not familiar. I meant no offense! ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:55, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- I was trying to be nice. Never mind.Zigzig20s (talk) 00:51, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
| Thank you for creating Simpson Pavilion and Stanich's!Zigzig20s (talk) 02:31, 14 November 2018 (UTC) |
- @Zigzig20s: Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 03:58, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Make Up (Ariana Grande song)
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
 A tag has been placed on Make Up (Ariana Grande song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. NØ 14:45, 16 November 2018 (UTC) |
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:09, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 47, 2018)
 The Equator on the world map of the Earth
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Mongoloid • Civics Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 19 November 2018 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |
|---|
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Another Believer. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about CTV2 (album)
Hello, Another Believer,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether CTV2 (album) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CTV2 (album) .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks,
Elmidae (talk · contribs) 12:21, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Elmidae: In the future, please consider redirecting before nominating for deletion. The page serves a purpose as a redirect. ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:48, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- I'm expecting redirection to be the outcome of the deletion discussion (as is frequently the case). But this way it's hopefully gonna stick, and not be reverted back and forth a few times. This ain't my first time to the "redirect an insufficiently notable article" rodeo :) --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 14:58, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Parukářka Park for deletion
Resolved A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Parukářka Park is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parukářka Park until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. [Username Needed] 15:43, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
Ways to improve Motown Magic
Thanks for creating Motown Magic.
A New Page Patroller Newslinger just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks for contributing this article to Wikipedia!
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
This week's article for improvement (week 48, 2018)
 Siri is a virtual assistant part of Apple Inc.'s iOS, watchOS, macOS, HomePod, and tvOS operating systems.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Equator • Mongoloid Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 26 November 2018 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |
|---|
A barnstar for you!
|
WikiProject Mexico Award |
| On behalf of WikiProject Mexico, I want to award you this barnstar for creating several articles about Mexican monuments. Thank you for your contributions! MX (✉ • ✎) 19:23, 26 November 2018 (UTC) |
- @MX: Wow, thank you so much! Expect more to be created soon! ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:23, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Untitled Sia Documentary Project listed at Redirects for discussion
Resolved An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Untitled Sia Documentary Project. Since you had some involvement with the Untitled Sia Documentary Project redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:15, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
December 2018 at Women in Red
Continuing: | ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
| | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Another Believer. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 20 | ← | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | → | Archive 30 |