Anuj Parikh

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chintan Bhagat (April 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chintan Bhagat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:40, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello! Anuj Parikh, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:40, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Chintan Bhagat.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Chintan Bhagat.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 19:46, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Early Life and Education

For the 1987 born Chintan Bhagat, was born into the world of financial markets. His great-grandfather started one of India’s oldest broking firms, Mangal Keshav in Mumbai in 1939. Daily exposure to stocks, financial talks and market conjecture have been a core part of his upbringing.

http://globalprimenews.com/2017/02/14/the-eureka-moment-that-changed-the-fortunes-of-an-80-year-old-broking-firm/

His family has had nearly 80 years Financial Markets experience and knowledge.

He did his schooling at the American School in Mumbai and has a Double-Major in Entrepreneurship and Economics Babson College, Boston, USA.

The Quant Algorithm

Inclined toward technology, coupled with a strong lineage of investing in and trading in the markets, Chintan developed a quant-based trading methodology merely at age 27. The trading methodology works seamlessly in a scientific manner.

On the 160th Iteration, Bhagat finally got the algorithm fine-tuned and he was able to test its performance on Global Financial Markets such as Australia, Japan, South Korea, Hong Kong, Europe and U.S.

http://www.afternoondc.in/business/wizkid-creates-magic-at-80-year-old-broking-firm/article_186621

Bhagat’s algorithm is quite unique in many ways. While other algorithms rely on a logic system such as Elliot Wave Theory as a precondition to work, Bhagat’s algorithm which is based on statistics, calculus and probability, only uses price and volume as the inputs into the formula. Since these two inputs will continue to exist at any point in time, the algorithm becomes self-adapting and works perfectly in all market conditions (whether trending or sideways, whether volatile or quiet). It works in real-time so it helps instant decision making as the system monitors changes every second.

http://www.business-standard.com/article/markets/mangal-keshav-introduces-quant-based-commodity-trading-technology-116122200907_1.html

http://www.afternoondc.in/business/wizkid-creates-magic-at-80-year-old-broking-firm/article_186621 The algorithm provides insights and knowledge at one’s fingertips, while giving them full control in terms of making his decision, ideally with a judicious mix of speed, risk and caution.

http://globalprimenews.com/2017/02/14/the-eureka-moment-that-changed-the-fortunes-of-an-80-year-old-broking-firm/

Although the algorithm is automated, Bhagat deliberately has kept it so it gives a buy/sell signal but it does not make the trade automatically. It still requires human discretion to take the final call, ensuring 100% safety.

Reference http://mumbainewsbox.blogspot.com/2017/02/prodigal-son-transforms-80-year-old.html

Personal Life

Bhagat is married and has one child. He has a keen interest in producing electronic music and practices daily meditation.

Investment Career

Chintan has a pedigree of 80 years in the financial markets and coming from a business family in the financial markets. After acquiring the shares of Bank Muscat back, and taking full control of the company, Chintan started his prop-desk out of Dubai in 2013 and started trading in Indian equities.

http://globalprimenews.com/2017/02/14/the-eureka-moment-that-changed-the-fortunes-of-an-80-year-old-broking-firm/

In August 2016, he laid the foundation of SkyFire Capital LLC, trading on the Chicago Board of Trade, Comex and CME trading futures of Gold, Crude Oil, S&P 500, Currency Futures and the U.S. 10-year Treasury note. The quant-based trading methodology has generated great interest, especially from high net worth individuals (HNIs) who have enjoyed stellar returns on their investment. The list of clients has been growing due to the fact that the algorithm works well across asset classes has enabled Insutitions and High Networth Indiviudals to diversify their investments across asset classes.

http://mumbainewsbox.blogspot.com/2017/02/prodigal-son-transforms-80-year-old.html

It is no surprise that the asset under management (AUM) of his firm has more than trebled in the last 3 years.

References

http://www.mangaltrader.com/soft/chintan/IMG-20170317-WA0031.jpg

http://globalprimenews.com/2017/02/14/the-eureka-moment-that-changed-the-fortunes-of-an-80-year-old-broking-firm/

http://www.afternoondc.in/business/wizkid-creates-magic-at-80-year-old-broking-firm/article_186621

http://www.business-standard.com/article/markets/mangal-keshav-introduces-quant-based-commodity-trading-technology-116122200907_1.html

http://mumbainewsbox.blogspot.com/2017/02/prodigal-son-transforms-80-year-old.html

Welcome! ...and a question.

Welcome, Anuj, to Wikipedia. Would you mind clarifying something? Specifically, what is the relationship between this account and User:Rakesh Ranpura and User:Parikhanuj1? Many thanks. Happy editing! — O Fortuna ^{semper crescis, aut decrescis} 07:17, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. — O Fortuna ^{semper crescis, aut decrescis} 07:49, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising.

Blocked for sockpuppetry

I received your e-mail. I prefer to discuss all issues here on-wiki. You can write me here, I'm WP:watching your talk page. Vanjagenije (talk) 06:50, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

• Hi! I just received another e-mail form you. Please, do not write me more mails. You can write anything you want HERE ON THIS PAGE. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:28, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Anuj Parikh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #18128 was submitted on Apr 25, 2017 18:48:10. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 18:48, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

• • It seams that you sent me yet another e-mail although I asked you not to send me more mails. Therefore, I removed your ability to send Wikipedia e-mails. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:45, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Unblock

User Name- Anuj Parikh Article Name- Chintan Bhagat

Dear Sir/Madam, I tried drafting an article from my account, 1st time when I sent it for review it got rejected because it looked more like an advertisement. The 2nd after editing the article, I again tried sending it for review but due to some problem, it was not getting sent. Hence I tried sending it by making a new account. After sending it from a new account, I received a notification regarding conflict of interest and both of my accounts were blocked. I am totally new to Wikipedia, and did not know about this. There is no such malpractice that is being carried out. I am innocent for this and not trying to do anything wrong. Kindly help me out and unblock my account. Thank You

• If you want to be unblocked, you should make a proper unblock request, using the {{unblock}} template as explained above. In the request you should explain why you registered three accounts (this one, Parikhanuj1 and Rakesh Ranpura). Vanjagenije (talk) 21:43, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Unblocking

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anuj Parikh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dear Sir/Madam, I tried drafting an article from my account, 1st time when I sent it for review it got rejected because it looked more like an advertisement. The 2nd after editing the article, I again tried sending it for review but due to some problem, it was not getting sent. Hence I tried sending it by making a new account. After sending it from a new account, I received a notification regarding conflict of interest and both of my accounts were blocked. I am totally new to Wikipedia, and did not know about this. There is no such malpractice that is being carried out. I am innocent for this and not trying to do anything wrong. Kindly help me out and unblock my account. I tried making new accounts -parikh.anuj1 and rakesh ranpura bcause I thought there was some problem in my current account- Anuj Parikh. I am new to wikipedia. I was not knowing about it. I thought I made some mistakes and thats the reason of making new accounts. There is nothing wrong or malpractice that is being carried out by me. Sorry. Kindly unblock the account. Thank You

Decline reason:

You are not innocent. You have violated WP:SOCK and WP:COI. However, you may be claiming that you made a mistake, rather than that you did not act badly. However, it's not clear what would happen if we unblocked you. Would you keep trying to make the same spammy article about yourself? Yamla (talk) 13:00, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.