Ariel Fernandez Ph D

Welcome

Hello Ariel Fernandez Ph D and welcome to Wikipedia! I am Ukexpat and I would like to thank you for your contributions.

Български | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Lietuvių | 한국어 | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Suomi | Svenska | Türkçe | 简体中文 | The main embassy page

Click here to reply to this message.

ukexpat (talk) 04:13, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: .  DMacks (talk) 03:35, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ariel Fernandez Ph D (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

What disrputive editing? I have the right to opine and contribute to the biography that has me as the subject. Ariel Fernandez Ph D (talk) 03:41, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You don't have the right to violate our policies on abusing multiple accounts and, worse, outing other editors. WP:AUTO also applies, but that's not why you were blocked. Huon (talk) 01:47, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ariel Fernandez Ph D (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The block is unnecessary. I understand that other colleagues at the same geolocation (same IP address) may have been involved in practices that are disruptive of Wikipedia but I have talked to them and they promised not to get further involved. On the other hand, I have the right to comment and disagree about things that are written on the Wikipedia article that has me as the subject, particularly if they are defamatory or libelous.Ariel Fernandez Ph D (talk) 10:19, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You should probably read what Huon noted in the previous unblock before making an additional unblock request, per WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT. If you continue to sidestep the underlying issues for your block, your talk page access will be revoked. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:22, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ariel Fernandez Ph D (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

1= Not sure what is going on here. I understand what constitutes disruptive practices and promise not to get involved in any practice that violates Wikipedia policy or may be considered disruptive. I understand that other colleagues at the same geolocation (same IP address) may have been involved in practices that are disruptive of Wikipedia or may have infringed Wikipedia regulations. They are not my socks. Furthermore, I have talked to them and they promised not to get involved in any issues pertaining to my case. On the other hand, I have the right to comment and disagree about things that are written on the Wikipedia article that has me as the subject, particularly if they are potentially defamatory or libelous. Ariel Fernandez Ph D (talk) 18:50, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Per Ohnoitsjamie's concerns below. I don't think you understand what is wrong with your behavior/edits. I also don't buy the WP:BROTHER-esque explanation for the sockpuppetry. only (talk) 13:33, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

OK. Have a nice day.Ariel Fernandez Ph D (talk) 15:04, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

All living individuals are covered by Wikipedia's biography of living persons policy. You, as a user, do not have any special "rights." You've already taken your concerns to the BLP noticeboard. You don't have "rights" to remove something from your biography that you don't like (e.g., links to retractionwatch.com). This has already been discussed here. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:33, 6 January 2016 (UTC)