User talk:Armadillopteryx/Archive 5
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Armadillopteryx. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
DYK for Hercules (nightclub)
On 6 June 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hercules (nightclub), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Hercules hosted a live-streamed talk show during the COVID-19 pandemic in Finland? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hercules (nightclub). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Hercules (nightclub)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
JR's
I was hoping JR's Bar and Grill could be about the Houston gay bar specifically, but perhaps there should be a single article about all 4 locations? I know you're focused on NJ/NY bars mostly, but curious if you have thoughts on the future of this article as well. Either way, thanks again for your amazing work! I'm a fan of your contributions to Wikipedia and look forward to reading more of your entries. ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:59, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Another Believer: Thanks for your kind words! I agree that an article on the chain would certainly be appropriate, especially if the individual venues are notable. I've been thinking about doing the same thing for Boxers NYC, as they've had four locations in New York plus one in Philadelphia, but we've only got an article for Boxers NYC Washington Heights so far. Armadillopteryx 14:47, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
- Armadillopteryx, I'm all about having separate articles for individual locations, when sourcing allows, but we should at least have entries for the notable chains when entries for specific locations may not be possible. ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:49, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Another Believer: Yes, I agree—that's what I was trying to say above; sorry if that got jumbled For Boxers, I want to add articles for the chain and for the other locations. It looks like the same could be done for JR's. Armadillopteryx 14:52, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
- Armadillopteryx, I'm all about having separate articles for individual locations, when sourcing allows, but we should at least have entries for the notable chains when entries for specific locations may not be possible. ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:49, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Barracuda Lounge
The article Barracuda Lounge you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Barracuda Lounge for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PinkElixir -- PinkElixir (talk) 17:21, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- Congrats! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:21, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Another Believer: Thank you! Armadillopteryx 17:08, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Headroom LGBTQ+ Lounge
On 13 June 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Headroom LGBTQ+ Lounge, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Headroom was a bar that operated only during the COVID-19 pandemic? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Headroom LGBTQ+ Lounge. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Headroom LGBTQ+ Lounge), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Your GA nomination of Therapy (New York City)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Therapy (New York City) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of RoySmith -- RoySmith (talk) 17:21, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Therapy (New York City)
The article Therapy (New York City) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Therapy (New York City) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of RoySmith -- RoySmith (talk) 16:01, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Thank you
... for what you said on User talk:SlimVirgin - missing pictured on my talk, with music full of hope and reformation --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:07, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Headroom LGBTQ+ Lounge
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Headroom LGBTQ+ Lounge you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 18:42, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Headroom LGBTQ+ Lounge
The article Headroom LGBTQ+ Lounge you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Headroom LGBTQ+ Lounge for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 10:22, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Therapy (New York City)
On 12 July 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Therapy (New York City), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that many Broadway stars went to Therapy on Monday nights? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Therapy (New York City). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Therapy (New York City)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:03, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
Precious
gay bars
Thank you for quality articles around gay bars such as Therapy (New York City), Barracuda Lounge, Headroom LGBTQ+ Lounge, for Lady Red Couture, for being a confessing wikignome, for "I am a linguist who wholeheartedly supports Wikipedia's mission ...", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
You are recipient no. 2629 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:11, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- Gerda Arendt, thank you so much! I really appreciate the prize and all of your kind words. Armadillopteryx 16:16, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- You are welcome to the prize from the cabal of the outcast ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:18, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Congrats! (and I hope you'll reconsider) Either way, thanks for your amazing contributions to Wikipedia! ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:17, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks, Another Believer. I'll continue to maintain the handful of project articles I've devoted the most time to, but I've unwatched the rest. I've not got the energy or interest to deal with outright nonsense and uncivil comments, both of which I've had my fill of from that project. I'm dealing with some things IRL and want my volunteer time on-wiki to be a source of relaxation, not stress. Armadillopteryx 16:18, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- Armadillopteryx, I totally understand. I got the impression some of the nonsense was from non-WPRPDR folks, but I am not following all of the table threads closely. You should definitely let Wikipedia but fun and enjoyable, not a taxing job, and I hope you find a good balance so you can continue to contribute. ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:55, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Another Believer: Yeah, it's not really internal stuff or people that are the issue; it's more the things that seem to follow the project around and keep popping up, which are hard to avoid as an active project member. I think I will try out some other areas of editing for a change of pace. Thanks for your kind words, as always. Armadillopteryx 02:14, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
- Armadillopteryx, I totally understand. I got the impression some of the nonsense was from non-WPRPDR folks, but I am not following all of the table threads closely. You should definitely let Wikipedia but fun and enjoyable, not a taxing job, and I hope you find a good balance so you can continue to contribute. ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:55, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
DYK for The Q (nightclub)
On 21 August 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Q (nightclub), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Q contains a drawing of "a buff Ned Flanders from The Simpsons with protruding nipples"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Q (nightclub). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Q (nightclub)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Your GA nomination of The Q (nightclub)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Q (nightclub) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 19:41, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Q (nightclub)
The article The Q (nightclub) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Q (nightclub) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 21:21, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Q (nightclub)
The article The Q (nightclub) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Q (nightclub) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 08:22, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rise Bar you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mikehawk10 -- Mikehawk10 (talk) 23:21, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
The article Rise Bar you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Rise Bar for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mikehawk10 -- Mikehawk10 (talk) 00:21, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
File:Coral Nebula Aelita Andre.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Coral Nebula Aelita Andre.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Saul Soliz
On 29 September 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Saul Soliz, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Saul Soliz was known as "the godfather of Texas MMA"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Saul Soliz. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Saul Soliz), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
The article Rise Bar you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Rise Bar for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mikehawk10 -- Mikehawk10 (talk) 04:41, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- Congrats on the GA! So great to see entries about LGBT venues promoted, keep up the great work! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:46, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Another Believer: Thank you! Hope you're enjoying your travels! Armadillopteryx 14:58, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'm having an incredible time. My first major (and much-needed) trip since COVID. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:04, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- ...and I'm even creating new LGBT entries as possible: Blue Chairs Resort by the Sea, Garbo, Mantamar Beach Club Bar & Sushi, Mr. Flamingo, Paco's Ranch, Palm Cabaret and Bar, etc. Doing my part! :) ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:09, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- That's great! I don't know how you manage to edit so prolifically even while on vacation; hats off to you! Armadillopteryx 18:25, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- ...and I'm even creating new LGBT entries as possible: Blue Chairs Resort by the Sea, Garbo, Mantamar Beach Club Bar & Sushi, Mr. Flamingo, Paco's Ranch, Palm Cabaret and Bar, etc. Doing my part! :) ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:09, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'm having an incredible time. My first major (and much-needed) trip since COVID. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:04, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Another Believer: Thank you! Hope you're enjoying your travels! Armadillopteryx 14:58, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- When moving the hook for this article from prep to queue, I changed it to ALT1, and also corrected the article, because neither was accurate. The source for the 800 people supporting the extension of hours did not say that the 800 were local residents, only that 21 lived in the same building. Many of these 800 may have been customers. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:31, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth: Thank you for catching and correcting my error! Armadillopteryx 08:59, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Rise Bar
On 13 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rise Bar, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Rise Bar's management spent more than US$110,000 soundproofing the space, which holds just 74 patrons? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rise Bar. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Rise Bar), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Nomination of Rise Bar for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rise Bar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Rise Bar AfD nomination
Hello! The AfD nomination I made has been closed as keep, and it's clear that consensus does not agree with me. Now that it's over, I wanted to assure you that the nomination really was made in good faith. I just didn't get around to reading your response on the talk page until a few days later, and had been hoping your reply would convince me the article was notable. Since I was not convinced, I went ahead with the nomination, but had no idea the article was on the front page at the time. That really was coincidence - if I had known, I would have waited until its DYK period was up. My apologies for "spoiling" the article's moment in the sun - that must have sucked, and I do appreciate the hard work you put into the article. Happy editing! Ganesha811 (talk) 15:00, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Ganesha811: Thanks, appreciate your note. Happy editing to you as well. Armadillopteryx 02:06, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
She is described in the article as a woman. You dont think that is right? Rathfelder (talk) 09:15, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Rathfelder: She is indeed a woman. But your edit put her in Category:21st-century African-American male singers. Guess it was just a typo? Armadillopteryx 15:07, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
That was a mistake. Thank you for spotting it. Rathfelder (talk) 15:12, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
- No worries! Armadillopteryx 15:14, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Your declaration of "unneeded" at the vegetarianism page
Your sentence says that packaged and processed foods may contain animal ingredients. What's this have to do with anything? Your sentence tries to tell us because it then says "while some vegetarians scrutinize product labels others do not object to consuming them or are unaware of their presence." So why are the vegetarians scrutinizing the product labels? For animal ingredients, which my edit of "for such ingredients" explains. Without this small clarification, your sentence just says that some vegetarians scrutinize product labels and others do not object to consuming products labels or are unaware of their presence. Unaware of the presence of product labels? My two small edits fix any ambiguity, and is grammatically correct because a comma should be between "labels" and "others". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dae kae (talk • contribs) 21:18, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Saul Soliz
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Saul Soliz you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 18:01, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Saul Soliz
The article Saul Soliz you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Saul Soliz for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 23:22, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Saul Soliz
The article Saul Soliz you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Saul Soliz for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 20:01, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
I'm sorry. I guess maybe it's because I've been looking to what year all the queens are born at google. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tiggerty321 (talk • contribs) 20:44, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Tiggerty321: It's okay! Just make sure to include a citation to a reliable source if you add that information to an article. Unfortunately, not every Google search result is a reliable source. Armadillopteryx 20:49, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:LGBT nightclubs in Illinois
A tag has been placed on Category:LGBT nightclubs in Illinois indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 06:11, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:LGBT nightclubs in Louisiana
A tag has been placed on Category:LGBT nightclubs in Louisiana indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 06:12, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:LGBT nightclubs in Wisconsin
A tag has been placed on Category:LGBT nightclubs in Wisconsin indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 06:12, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
One year! |
---|
Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:57, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you, Gerda Arendt! Armadillopteryx 07:24, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Deletion review
In 2019 you participated in a discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plastique Tiara, which resulted in a consensus to redirect to RuPaul's Drag Race (season 11). I have now taken the article to deletion review, at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2022 September 28#Plastique Tiara. I am informing everyone who participated in the deletion discussion, except two indef-blocked accounts and an IP address which last edited two years ago, in case they would like to contribute to the deletion review. JBW (talk) 21:55, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Oxford comma
A majority of American style guides mandate use of the serial comma. N US based articles, please stop deleting its use. The needless introduction of random approaches is not I think helpful. Among other things,it makes the project uglier. Thanks and happy holidays. 2603:7000:2143:8500:75BB:B7C8:29F5:DB77 (talk) 09:35, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, and thanks for your note. There are indeed many American style guides, but the one used on this site is the Wikipedia Manual of Style. Its section on the Oxford comma says:
Editors may use either convention [Oxford comma or no Oxford comma] so long as each article is internally consistent.
I personally choose to use it in situations where the comma is needed to reduce ambiguity or improve the flow of text, but otherwise I omit it as an unnecessary character. Typically, articles should be left with whatever convention was first introduced. Hope you have nice holidays as well! Take care, Armadillopteryx 21:19, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Cherry Valentine
Hello! Hope you're doing well. Saw you made a few edits recently and figured I'd say hi. On the off chance you're interested in taking a quick look (or completing a more extensive review), I've co-nominated Cherry Valentine for Featured article status. No worries if you're uninterested. Hope you're enjoying Season 15 and others (if you watch any international iterations).
For now, take care! ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:27, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Hey! Nice to hear from you :-) I would love to take a look at the FAC but am not sure I'll have time. I can let you know with more certainty by the end of the week. Lately I've been swamped with work IRL, but I'm trying to carve out time to sloooowly add updates to a couple of my GAs. I'll get through that first and then contribute to the FAC if there's time left.
- Hope you're well and that you're enjoying the recent seasons, too! Armadillopteryx 03:14, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Drag Race Holland logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Drag Race Holland logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:07, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Were Here promotional poster.png
Thanks for uploading File:Were Here promotional poster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:40, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
Two years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:27, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you, Gerda! Armadillopteryx 17:06, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
‘Openly gay’
Hi, I’m still learning how Wikipedia editing works so apologies for my re-edit of the Kameron Michaels page.
Just wanted to share a link about why, in my opinion, it’s not right to use the term ‘openly gay’. https://www.advocate.com/commentary/2021/3/01/why-openly-gay-offensive-term
Thanks 😊 Aspence30 (talk) 22:09, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
- As far as I remember, the "openly gay" convention had been used in the Drag Race WikiProject's articles for awhile as a way to be unambiguous that no article subject was being outed by us, but I don't have the time to look for those old discussions where this was addressed—and I see the language has changed in many articles now, anyway. I don't have a problem with you deleting "openly," but bear in mind that opinion pieces in news sources aren't, generally speaking, a solid rationale to do something a specific way on Wiki. Either way, I think the article is fine as you've left it.
- Thanks for your note, and happy editing! Armadillopteryx 17:12, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
My edits to Honey Davenport
Hi! The reference I’ve used to cite part of Honey’s birth name doesn’t appear for you, but I promise that it appears for me. Is there any way I’d be able to prove this to you, and/or find a solution to the link not showing the information? Cornmazes (talk) 21:26, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hey! I believe you if you say it shows up for you, but it's a verifiability issue if the info isn't readily available when someone else clicks the source link. Are you able to make an archived version of the page that shows the info? I'm not sure if it will show up in the Web Archive if it's just a dynamic search page, but you could try: http://web.archive.org/ Armadillopteryx 21:31, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, I only just saw this, sorry! Wikipedia decided not to notify me of your response.. I’ll try my best! Cornmazes (talk) 04:35, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
File:Draw the Blood clip.ogv listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Draw the Blood clip.ogv, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. :3 F4U (they/it) 16:12, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Stacy Layne Matthews
Hi! Hope you're doing well as we approach the end of the year. I was wondering if you might be able to read Stacy Layne Matthews, which I've nominated for Good article status. Hoping for any feedback before the nom gets picked up. Either way, happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:25, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hi! Apologies for my delayed response. I've spent the past month caring for a friend in the hospital and haven't been online much. Happy to see the article passed GAN. Congratulations (and hope you're having nice holidays)! Armadillopteryx 21:08, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
- No worries! Always an invite, never a requirement. Wishing good things for you in the new year. ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:24, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Edelman Family Foundation
Hello @Armadillopteryx
I am reaching out to you because of your previous participation in one of the discussions regarding the reliability and neutrality of HuffPost/Pink News/ProPublica as sources used on Wikipedia.
Currently, there is an ongoing issue with the Edelman Family Foundation section in the Joseph Edelman Wikipedia article. The section appears to be biased and lacks a balanced representation of the foundation's activities, as it primarily focuses on a single controversial donation while neglecting to mention the organization's numerous other significant contributions to various causes.
I would like to invite you to participate in the discussion on the BLP Noticeboard to address the concerns surrounding the section's neutrality and explore ways to improve its content. Llama Tierna (talk) 18:07, 1 April 2024 (UTC)