Welcome to Wikipedia from the Anatomy Wikiproject!

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia from WikiProject Anatomy! We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of anatomy articles here on Wikipedia. One of our members has noticed that you are involved in editing anatomy articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, a few things that may be relevant to editing wikipedia articles are:

 
  • Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
  • You will make a big difference to the quality of information by adding reliable sources. Sourcing anatomy articles is essential and makes a big difference to the quality of articles. And, while you're at it, why not use a book to source information, which can source multiple articles at once!
  • We try and use a standard way of arranging the content in each article. That layout is here. These headings let us have a standard way of presenting the information in anatomical articles, indicate what information may have been forgotten, and save angst when trying to decide how to organise an article. That said, this might not suit every article. If in doubt, be bold!
  • We write for a general audience. Every reader should be able to understand anatomical articles, so when possible please write in a simple form -- most readers do not understand anatomical jargon. See this essay for more details.

Feel free to contact us on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. I wish you all the best on your wiki-voyages! --Tom (LT) (talk) 20:46, 30 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

July 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm Calidum. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Microsoft have been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Calidum ¤ 01:39, 28 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Apple Inc., did not appear constructive and have been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Pianoman320 (talk) 04:06, 28 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

References

edit
 

Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:48, 15 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Original research

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Tide, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 22:18, 16 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Couple of things

edit

Every term in a list does not go in a header.

We do not put links in headings.

Best

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:21, 21 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

WP:MEDHOW

edit

Can help you with proper formating of references. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 07:15, 31 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

References

edit
 

Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Jytdog (talk) 18:05, 16 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

July 2017

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:03, 25 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
You have copied and pasted from [1] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:03, 25 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

6 august 2018 2:47 pm edt

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arnon81 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

i dont like to sugar-coat my wikipedia-writing just so my writing looks different from the reference.
example of using many different words to point to 1 meaning : # Variable_valve_timing#Automotive_nomenclature # Electronic_stability_control#Product_names and why spinal-canal-stenosis ? not spinal-canal-constriction ? constriction is more common-word than stenosis.

Decline reason:

You are required to not copy and paste. It doesn't matter if you don't like it, you aren't allowed to violate WP:COPYRIGHT. Yamla (talk) 19:08, 6 August 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

are you all (Yamla, Doc James) copyright-lawyers working for the reference which i use https://www.nytimes.com/1993/08/15/us/14-year-cleanup-at-three-mile-island-concludes.html ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arnon81 (talkcontribs)

Obviously not, and I suggest not sabotaging your future chances at getting your account unblocked. --Yamla (talk) 18:33, 8 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

is there any person paying you all (Yamla, Doc James) to enforce copyright-law or to block me personally ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arnon81 (talkcontribs)

What a bizarre statement. No. I'm a volunteer here. And you just lost access to this talk page. You are free to use WP:UTRS, but I strongly urge you to try a radically different argument if you wish to be unblocked, because the ones you've pursued here have zero chance of working. WP:GAB may help you. --Yamla (talk) 18:47, 8 August 2018 (UTC)Reply