Your submission at Articles for creation: Physics Wallah (PW) (May 16)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 10:34, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Arrsar11522! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 10:34, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Physics Wallah (PW) (May 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Gusfriend were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Gusfriend (talk) 07:28, 17 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

May 2022

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arrsar11522 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

our account has been blocked on Wikipedia because our content was promotional rather neutral. We understand your concern that we can't use promotional tone while submitting an article on Wikipedia. As we had no idea about it so we just submit a normal article in the Wikipedia but now we will not use promotional tone and will keep the article neutral. We will also include all the reliable sources while submitting the article Arrsar11522 (talk) 11:26, 24 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

This doesn't even mention WP:SOCK once. Yamla (talk) 11:34, 24 June 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Arrsar11522 (talk) 09:42, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
  Not done: please use the {{unblock}} to request an unblock, not {{edit semi-protected}}. 💜  melecie  talk - 10:01, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arrsar11522 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Thanks for your quick response. We have created the multiple account and we are getting sockpuppet issue because in our first account all the referral links were blacklisted but now we have many reliable sources because PhysicsWallah (PW) has become 101st unicorn of India. Also, when we were trying to upload any content in the previous account it was deleted again and again so we decided to create a new account and we are using only this account for submitting information on Wikipedia. We can delete that account if it is necessary to unban this account. Please guide us and let us know the information so that we can unban this account and can add our content on Wikipedia because it is very important that our company's information is available on Wikipedia page Arrsar11522 (talk) 12:24, 24 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You keep using "we", "our", "us" etc in your unblock request. This is telling me this is a shared account, which is explicitly not allowed on Wikipedia. Also, if your sole reason to edit is to "share your company's information", then you need to look else as Wikipedia is not for promoting your company. RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:54, 24 June 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please review Wikipedia:Notability (companies and organizations); your company isn't entitled to have a Wikipedia article simply because it exists. You must demonstrate that it is sufficiently notable for inclusion. Also, statements like "it is very important that our company's information is available on Wikipedia page" make it sound like your intention is to use Wikipedia for publicity. We have no interest in helping you publicize your company's existence; please see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:32, 24 June 2022 (UTC)Reply