Articlegooroo

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harlem Arts Festival has been accepted

Harlem Arts Festival, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 02:07, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Articlegooroo, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Articlegooroo! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Keelan (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:09, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Beyond Better Foods has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Beyond Better Foods. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 19:49, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Awesome , I believe I've made the corrections - let me know if there's anything else that needs to happen! Articlegooroo (talk) 22:14, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beyond Better Foods (March 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DGG were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Beyond Better Foods and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Beyond Better Foods, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 22:39, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Re: Draft:Beyond Better Foods

Hello Articlegooroo I have added projects United States, Companies, to your article. You may wish to join them, check their to-do, and meet new people with interest in these topics. ( To reply click "edit" next to this section, and add your reply at the end. ) Cheers, --Gryllida (talk) 02:46, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beyond Better Foods (April 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Beyond Better Foods and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Beyond Better Foods, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 21:42, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi Sulfurboy!

I wrote this on your page, but figure to response here. Appreciate the feedback about the Beyond Better Foods article. I wasn't sure whether to put an article about the product, or the company which mentions the product, since they're always mentioned together. Would it make sense, and address this, to switch this title or article to be Enlightened ice cream itself? That feels like an advertisement, no?

The main thing is this definitely FEELS like it should be here since its clear its reach, impact, and distribution is so sizable. The product is available all over the country and has been reviewed and covered by many (these were just a handful) outlets and individuals. Nearly of those outlets are completely independent of the company - women's health, Nosh, Redbook, Popsugar, Today.com....these were just a few (I figured at some point it merited stopping). All of these are staking their claim with editorial integrity to their readers - giving opinions on a product, often what companies like Women's Health is known for. This much coverage certainly establishes some kind of notability, no?

What would you suggest? doing? Let me know if switching this to just Enlightened, and mentioned that its made by Beyond Better Foods) make more sense, or if you have an alternative suggestion.

Thanks! Articlegooroo (talk) 02:26, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beyond Better Foods (April 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Beyond Better Foods and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Beyond Better Foods, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 07:06, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

Hello Articlegooroo. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Articlegooroo. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Articlegooroo|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Julietdeltalima (talk) 17:21, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi User:Julietdeltalima,

You are definitely mistaken here. Apologies for the delay here. I am not being compensated in any form whatsoever, have not been asked by the company to do this, etc. If there was any indication that there was some benefit or connection at this point, it was definitely not intentional and incorrect. Quite honestly, I was using other articles that I found on similar topics as a basis - Halo Top Creamery, Ben and Jerry's, Pepperidge Farm, as well as larger companies like Skinny Cow, etc.

I understand the importance of this.

Anyway, yeah. Let me know if there's anything else I need to do here. Articlegooroo (talk) 21:58, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Articlegooroo! You created a thread called Article Publishing Question: Notoriety Issue! at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
1,314		Mobb Deep (talk)	Add sources
8		Super Concert '70 (talk)	Add sources
26		Powder Ridge Rock Festival (talk)	Add sources
250		California Jam (talk)	Add sources
70		Soulive (talk)	Add sources
20		Bath Festival of Blues (talk)	Add sources
48		Mar y Sol Pop Festival (talk)	Cleanup
14		Kevin Burrus (talk)	Cleanup
84		Crowd surfing (talk)	Cleanup
10		Barbeque 67 (talk)	Expand
2,072		Earth, Wind & Fire (talk)	Expand
15		Gitarijada (talk)	Expand
118		H.N.I.C. (Prodigy album) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
346		Music festival (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
58		Festivali i Këngës (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
86		Electric boogaloo (dance) (talk)	Merge
173		Waacking (talk)	Merge
94		Self-insurance (talk)	Merge
5		Graph Nobel (talk)	Wikify
490		Bill Graham (promoter) (talk)	Wikify
24		Motherlode (band) (talk)	Wikify
4		Nate Jones On Bass (talk)	Orphan
3		Ryan McNamara (talk)	Orphan
3		BeNews (talk)	Orphan
234		California Jam II (talk)	Stub
8		Laurel Pop Festival (talk)	Stub
10		Lalah Hathaway Live (talk)	Stub
24		Santos Party House (talk)	Stub
34		H.N.I.C. 3 (talk)	Stub
10		Midwest Rock Festival (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:08, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Beyond Better Foods has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Beyond Better Foods. Thanks! Sulfurboy (talk) 04:39, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beyond Better Foods (April 15)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by DGG were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This is a promotional press release, not an encyclopedia article.

DGG ( talk ) 07:18, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Beyond Better Foods

Hello, Articlegooroo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Beyond Better Foods".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:29, 5 February 2021 (UTC)