October 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm ThaddeusSholto. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 15:08, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, For my mistake I promise that this mistake will be not repeated futher. And one thing more can you please remove restriction from my friend's account his username is Rikankur Roy. Hope you will help him. Thank you Aryan Ore (talk) 15:13, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Semrush, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 15:25, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aryan Ore (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have been blocked from Wikipedia because I have inserted some anonymous website link. I request you to give me a last chance. And I also promise that I will not do any mistakes further that may break the Wikipedia guidelines. Hope you understand and help me to remove restrictions from my accounts. Aryan Ore (talk) 15:31, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

No, this is not why you were blocked. Additionally, one open unblock request at a time, please. Yamla (talk) 16:36, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

That isn't why I blocked you at all. 331dot (talk) 15:35, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

It is identical to how Rikankur Roy requested their own unblock. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 16:23, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aryan Ore (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have been restricted from editing Wikipedia pages because I have removed some content from Wikipedia page without giving a valid reason. Please give me a last chance to edit Wikipedia pages. I promise you that I will not do anything which break the Wikipedia guidelines. I hope you will help me to unblock.

Decline reason:

You are actually blocked for abuse of multiple accounts. In your next unblock request, you should address this reason. PhilKnight (talk) 13:00, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Aryan Ore (talk) 12:42, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply