Asbchoudhary9
Welcome!
editHi Asbchoudhary9! I noticed your contributions to Narayan Beniwal and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! DreamRimmer (talk) 12:25, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for appreciating my work on Wikipedia Asbchoudhary9 (talk) 12:37, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Ravi Kumar Sihag
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Ravi Kumar Sihag, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:05, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
You appear to have a close connection to the subject on Wikipedia that raises concerns about a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged.
Anyone with a conflict of interest must avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing articles related to you, your family or colleagues, your organization or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
- and you must always:
- avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.
Note that you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. Even if you are not being paid, you are expected to disclose any close connection with the subject of the article, using the connected contributor template.
For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you.AfC notification: Draft:Mana Baba Temple has a new comment
edit
April 2023
edit
You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abhaybeniwalreengus. Thank you. DreamRimmer (talk) 07:59, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
edit
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Asbchoudhary9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Dear Girth Summit, Thank you for the notice regarding my indefinite block from editing Wikipedia. I understand that my actions have been viewed as sockpuppetry, and I would like to apologize for any confusion or disruption that I may have caused on the site. I would like to clarify that I did create multiple accounts in the past, including the accounts "dippswrite" and "abhaybeniwalreengus," which have since been blocked due to sockpuppetry. I fully acknowledge that this was a mistake, and I would like to take this opportunity to inform you that I have no intention of using these accounts again. Therefore, I request Wikipedia to delete both of these old accounts as they are no longer needed. Furthermore, I understand that my current account "asbchoudhary9" was also blocked as part of the sockpuppetry investigation, and I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused. However, I would like to clarify that I created this account solely to contribute to Wikipedia by providing accurate and reliable information to the community. I acknowledge that using multiple accounts is not allowed, and I regret any misunderstanding or harm that my actions may have caused. I would like to request that my block be lifted so that I can continue contributing to Wikipedia in a responsible and transparent manner using my current account "asbchoudhary9". I am committed to following all of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines and to avoiding any behavior that could be viewed as sockpuppetry or otherwise disruptive. Thank you for your time and consideration, and please let me know if there is any additional information that I can provide to support my case. Sincerely, [Asbchoudhary9] Asbchoudhary9 (talk) 16:25, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
No chance, not while you continue setting up accounts to evade your block. Your best bet is to go at least six months with zero edits, then apply under WP:SO with your original account. Yamla (talk) 18:53, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Asbchoudhary9 (talk) 16:19, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- I don't review blocks that I have imposed myself, I will leave that for another administrator to attend to, but I will say this: your first account was blocked before I discovered this account, because you had used multiple accounts to voice your opinion in an AfD discussion, attempting to give yourself two votes. That is deceptive, dishonest, not a simple mistake, and it only happened last month. Rather than appeal your block at the time, you simply created new accounts and carried on editing. This is not acceptable. My advice to the reviewing admin would be to decline this request, and to direct you to the standard offer. Girth Summit (blether) 16:28, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- Dear Girth Summit,
I would like to express my sincere apologies for my past behavior on Wikipedia that led to my block. I understand and acknowledge my mistake of using multiple accounts to vote in an AfD discussion. I deeply regret my actions and any harm they may have caused to the community.
I appreciate your honesty and the time you took to respond to my unblock request. I understand that you are not reviewing blocks you have imposed and that you advise the reviewing admin to decline my request and direct me to the standard offer. However, I wanted to take this opportunity to show my genuine remorse and my commitment to making amends.
I want to assure you that I have learned from my mistake and that I am fully committed to following Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I understand the importance of honesty and transparency in contributing to Wikipedia, and I am dedicated to being a responsible and trustworthy contributor moving forward.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
[Asbchoudhary9] Asbchoudhary9 (talk) 16:49, 23 April 2023 (UTC)