Asdfghjkl9658

Whitney Houston grave location: (40.6652374, -74.3263051) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1002:B001:542A:49EB:689F:B98D:F3CB (talk) 16:14, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Ronan

Hello Saoirse Ronan born in Aprill 12 1985 (not 1994) age 35 years old (not 26). because Saoirse Ronan was 13 years old in City of Ember(movie) when she played the character Lina Mayfleet in 2008. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.127.82.114 (talk) 13:29, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

1994 + 13 = 2007. 1985 + 13 = 1998. DrKay (talk) 16:23, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Asdfghjkl9658! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 19:58, 23 April 2020 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Featured articles

Do not add Template:Featured article to articles. The process at WP:FAC must be followed for all promotions. DrKay (talk) 19:20, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Little Women (2019 film) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! KyleJoan^talk 04:25, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Britney Spears, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not add Good Article templates to articles that have not undergone a GA review. Larry Hockett (Talk) 01:12, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Your nomination of Britney Spears at GAN

Asdfghjkl9658, it looks like you're new to the Good Article nomination process. I imagine that's why you are not acquainted with the the following from the nomination instructions page: Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult regular editors of the article on the article talk page prior to a nomination. You have made a small number of edits, which does not make you a significant contributor.

I realize that, by your recent editing history where you added the Good Article icon to the Britney Spears article without a GA review, that you very much want the article to become a GA. You nevertheless must follow the proper steps; as you did not, I have reverted your nomination of the article. If you do wish to renominate the article, you'll need to consult the regular editors on the article talk page per above, and also do some work on the article—the final sentence in the lead section is unclear, as it doesn't identify the 12-year period (which ended in 2012?). Please feel free to let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, and best of luck going forward. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:41, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Britney Spears's vocal range

See what I stated here and here. And, again, if some sources state "soprano", that should not be removed. We report both per WP:Verifiability. That is, if what you added about her vocal range is WP:Due. If only a few sources state that, your text on the matter should likely be removed. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 03:11, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Sneaky disruptive edits

Some of your edits are sneakily disruptive, such as this one I reverted. You should not be removing the "featured article" template from a WP:Featured article. And not too long ago, BlueMoonset reverted you on this. You also should not be changing words to mean something other than what the sources state, as you sometimes do. One can forgive some of your editing if it truly amounts to WP:Newbie mistakes (if you truly are a newbie). But if disruptive editing from you continues, you are likely to find yourself WP:Blocked or reported at WP:ANI...which may result in you being WP:Blocked. That you make some decent or good copyedits doesn't outweigh the questionable or bad edits you make. The WP:Competence is required essay is often cited for valid reasons. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 08:38, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Flyer22 Frozen, since you pinged me, I took a look at Johansson edit, and it turns out that the "featured article" template was not removed but moved to the bottom of the article—the FA icon was still shown—where the template instructions say it ought to go: This template should be placed at the bottom of the article before defaultsort, categories and interwikis. So that part of the edit wasn't a problem, but fine. I wouldn't have changed "among" to "amongst"—this is an article in American English, and "amongst" is typically British English. The other changes were a mixed bag of okay and not helpful. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:00, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

I concur with this assessment, regarding the inexplicable and unexplained edits to Christina Aguilera. Elizium23 (talk) 08:25, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

WP:SIMPLE rules

Please follow the WP:SIMPLE rules and explain your changes with an edit summary.

Also when updating Rotten Tomatoes please make sure to also update the access-date when you do. -- 109.78.211.204 (talk) 01:49, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Messing with pp templates

Can we ask why you are messing around with {{pp-vandalism}} and changing it to other things? I noticed you removed {{pp-move}} from Justin Timberlake. What's up with that? Elizium23 (talk) 01:40, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Rotten Tomatoes

When you update Rotten Tomatoes please try to remember to also update the reference access-date too.[1] Thanks.

The score changed again so I've updated it anyway. -- 109.77.200.213 (talk) 23:04, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Pointless edits

I reverted another pointless edit from you. It contained nothing substantial; spelling changes away from the ENGVAR standard, semantically-identical words, punctuation. You'll really need to consider whether you're making an improvement when you edit articles. Thanks. Elizium23 (talk) 23:00, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. I see you've already been asked to use these. Please implement accurate edit summaries as often as possible in the future. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 16:01, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Dead

Please avoid WP:EUPHAMISMs. The main example warned against in the guidelines is exactly the mistake you've made:

Words to watch: passed away, gave his life, eternal rest, make love, an issue with, collateral damage, living with cancer, ...

Also please check the article history when making changes, and don't repeat changes that have been reverted already. Please follow the WP:SIMPLE rules and explain your changes with an edit summary. -- 109.76.154.21 (talk) 18:07, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Plastic Hearts, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Hayman30 (talk) 12:17, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Mariah Carey without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Maxwell King¹²³³²¹ 04:55, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of awards and nominations received by Jennifer Aniston, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Critics' Choice Award. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Midnight Sky. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Hayman30 (talk) 07:26, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

• Please stop adding sentences such as "XXXX received acclaim from music critics" to song articles without citing a reliable source. Combining materials from multiple sources to reach an unimplied conclusion is against WP:SYNTH and will not be tolerated. You have been warned about this and have been reverted multiple times. I noticed that you tried to sneak OR into many of your edits which appear to be constructive, hoping that it will go under the radar, which is disruptive and is not going to work. You may be blocked from editing if you continue this behaviour. Hayman30 (talk) 07:36, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

March 2021

Removing dates from articles is considered vandalism. Please cease doing so without an explanation. Nate • (chatter) 00:20, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

April 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Helen McCrory. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Several editors have given you warnings. Stop. – S. Rich (talk) 15:59, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 01:29, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Not sure why you still don't implement these reguarly, but it's painfully obvious that you consciously have chosen to disregard requests to use edit summaries. Please change that ASAP. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 22:57, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gal Gadot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

June 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Chrissy Teigen, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. KyleJoan^talk 03:29, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Free Britney movement. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. KyleJoan^talk 04:13, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Free Britney Movement, you may be blocked from editing. Please explain why "ran" should be used instead of "published" or leave it alone. KyleJoan^talk 02:16, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Florence Pugh. KyleJoan^talk 08:25, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. KyleJoan^talk 02:41, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to The Queen's Gambit (miniseries). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Notfrompedro (talk) 16:40, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

August 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Chrissy Teigen. KyleJoan^talk 01:56, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Please don't change the format of dates, as you did to Joel Kinnaman. As a general rule, if an article has evolved using predominantly one format, the dates should be left in the format they were originally written in, unless there are reasons for changing it based on strong national ties to the topic. Please also note that Wikipedia does not use ordinal suffixes (e.g., st, nd, th), articles, or leading zeros on dates.

For more information about how dates should be written on Wikipedia, please see this page.

If you have any questions about this, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Enjoy your time on Wikipedia. Thank you. Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 14:27, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Use of edit summaries

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks!

Per the report linked above, 98% of your edits have no edit summary. Given some of your editing has been viewed as problematic (I refer to the above messages), it's really quite important that you start using edit summaries immediately. — Manticore 06:31, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello the page is lacking one relevant information which’s the second most followed Instagram account it’s Leomessi

So I will imply you to make and amendments of it soon 105.112.183.8 (talk) 07:06, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

December 2021

Hello, I'm Maxwell King123321. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mariah Carey have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Maxwell King¹²³³²¹ 10:13, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Edit conflicts on Daniel Radcliffe

It appears that you had started editing Daniel Radcliffe before I had posted my edit, and then yours was posted which removed my edit. I imagine this was accidental. I'm going to look at the edits, and try to combine your work and mine. Alden Loveshade (talk) 02:35, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

image_alt

Please do not remove image_alt from infoboxes with images, as this parameter is used for accewssibility purposes. Please see MOS:ALT for details. Mindmatrix 18:23, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Edit summaries again

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! KyleJoan^talk 03:33, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

March 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Still not using edit summaries. Is this really worth getting blocked? - FlightTime (open channel) 18:01, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Willking1979. An edit that you recently made to Breakout (Miley Cyrus album) seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Willking1979 (talk) 02:41, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

Hello, I'm Bovineboy2008. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Lightyear (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. BOVINEBOY2008 23:51, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 18:33, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Going over your talk page and contribs, this looks to be a chronic issue with you, for which you've been abundantly warned. As is this. Yet, as far as I can see, you have never responded to anyone who has reached out to you. This looks to be a case of WP:RADAR. Interact in a collaborative manner, use edit summaries, and source your additions or you will lose your editing privileges. This is your final warning. - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 18:44, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding your refusal to communicate. The thread is User:Asdfghjkl9658. Thank you. Antique Rose 20:51, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hrs for See WP:RADAR. Refusal to use edit summaries or respond, ever, to anyone on talk pages or at ANI. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 00:34, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 17:45, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

This is now a checkuser block, evading as Hugo.Std95 -- ferret (talk) 00:47, 26 July 2022 (UTC)