Asfijasdifjasdi

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Asfijasdifjasdi/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:32, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Asfijasdifjasdi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 06:32, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

could you please tell me what is missing so I could include it? thanks Asfijasdifjasdi (talk) 07:34, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 16)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Duplicate of Draft:Dan Eid, where it has been rejected already.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:29, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

could you please tell me what is missing so I could include it?

Thanks Asfijasdifjasdi (talk) 07:33, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

I don't think we need to rehash the same arguments. Please don't create any more copies of this. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:37, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

I will keep trying and fixing the article until it's published... tell me what needs to be adjusted or please let someone else help me. thanks Asfijasdifjasdi (talk) 07:39, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Why are you so insistent, what is your interest in this person? You told me earlier that you don't even know him. Something doesn't quite add up here.

In any case, please be aware that if you keep spamming us with this, you may get sanctioned and eventually blocked. Please don't go there, it's no fun for anyone. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:44, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Because it's easy for you to just reject an article. This is the 2nd lawyer i write something about and you rejected me...

You're obviously not from Lebanon or any arab country otherwise you would have seen the references and know why this is important

I don't understand why you are insisting on not publishing it Asfijasdifjasdi (talk) 07:47, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

sorry I was intense my email, I just think it's not fair that I worked so hard on doing research and figuring out how things function on wikipedia and reading all the regulations so that my work gets rejected in seconds Asfijasdifjasdi (talk) 08:40, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 16)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CNMall41 was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Already rejected multiple times, also under Draft:Dan Eid. User reported for WP:TE.

CNMall41 (talk) 07:46, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

March 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:32, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi HJ Mitchell,

I am not sure why I was blocked just because DoubleGrazing is not being professional in his responses,

I would kindly like to ask you to consider unblocking and helping me fix my article

Thank you Asfijasdifjasdi (talk) 09:41, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

You didn't need to ping me, but since you did, I will respond. You weren't blocked because I'm "not being professional". If you wish to appeal your block, you'll need to dig deeper than that. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:07, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

ok, white person Asfijasdifjasdi (talk) 10:14, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Racism won't get you unblocked! Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 10:21, 16 March 2023 (UTC)