Leave me a message.

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia!

Here are some tips to help you get started:

--[[User:Glimz|Glimz ­ ]] 20:40, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)

P.S. Regarding your changes to Adagio and Remo Giazotto: Please note that Giazotto's Adagio, famous as it is, doesn't belong in the Adagio article. Quoting Tempo: Generally, composers (or music publishers) will name movements of classical compositions (and in some cases individual compositions) after their tempo (and/or mood) marking, as for instance in Samuel Barber's Adagio for Strings. Similarly, Giazotto's work is referred to as Adagio per flauto, archi, e organo.

Also, according to wiki-syntax, you should use

''text''

instead of <i>text</i>. Many people (including me:-) agree however, that for hyperlinked titles additional emphasis is often unnecessary. Thus, I would leave [[Adagio]] as it is. --Glimz

Point taken—Trevor Caira 22:14, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Sysop nomination

edit

I would like to nominate you to be a Wikipedia administrator—Trevor Caira 02:04, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)

That's very kind of you, and is always nice to hear. However I've been nominated less than a month ago (and there was no consensus (yes, I was shocked too)); Current practice is not to have a nomination of someone more than once a month, so I think it's better to wait until the beginning of next year. If you still feel the same way at that time, I'd be very grateful. For the time being I'll just tolerate having to make a few extra clicks per vandalism, it's not that big a deal. Thanks again for the compliment though, it does make it all worth it. --fvw* 02:07, 2004 Dec 19 (UTC)

Vandalism

edit

Keep up the good work. I have to go soon. Kevintoronto 21:18, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Damn! You beat me again.

edit

Keep up the good work fighting vandalism!—Trevor Caira 22:08, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Thanks, you too. Wikipedia is a wonderful community, but sometimes on RC patrol you realise Sartre was right: Hell is other Editors. --fvw* 22:12, 2004 Dec 20 (UTC)
I didn't beat you, we beat 198.169.140.30. Ahhh.... the thrill of victory over a number.... Kevintoronto 22:22, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Should be OK now. Evercat 17:36, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Thanks—Trevor Caira 17:46, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Opeth

edit

Hello there. Yes, the Statistic section is, as I see it, the worst idea on the Wikipedia. It merely repeats what is said on the lead section, only in a less informative way. Yesterday I went through all of the articles on List of Death Metal bands eliminating the Statistic section (and merging whatever useful information I found into the lead section) and fixing the articles in the best way I could, since they were mostly on a bad shape. Do you feel the Statistics section is useful? Only one editor has told me that in the entirety of my time here, but I do respect all points of view. Cheers. --Sn0wflake 23:13, 29 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

User categorisation

edit

You were listed on the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Switzerland page as living in or being associated with Switzerland. As part of the Wikipedia:User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Wikipedians in Switzerland for instructions. --Army1987 14:40, 2 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Licensing

edit

Please have a look at the talk page of a template you created - NoMultiLicense. Thanks. --logixoul 15:56, 15 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

i need help on finding out my cats berad?

hi my name is cindy and i have a black cat and he has green eyes and he is about 20lbs and i do not know what his bread is can you tell me or help me find out what his bread is.

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:NoMultiLicense

edit

 Template:NoMultiLicense has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. ViperSnake151  Talk  02:28, 24 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:CVGIDRIVEtopic

edit

 Template:CVGIDRIVEtopic has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. RL0919 (talk) 18:38, 13 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)Reply