February 2017

edit
  • A Wikipedia user page is for someone who is active in working for the project to give a little information about himself or herself in connection with his or her work for the encyclopaedia: it is not a place to post a personal web page, unrelated to work for Wikipedia. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:30, 17 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • Likewise, an article talk page is for discussions relating to editing that article. It is not a place to post comments about yourself, unrelated to the article. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:59, 17 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm IronGargoyle. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mequinol, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:51, 17 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mequinol. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 22:00, 17 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Ashfaq Fazal, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Ashfaq Fazal! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

November 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Pkbwcgs. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Clonazepam— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:18, 30 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

December 2018

edit

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Wikipedia:Article development, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Izno (talk) 23:07, 5 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Cellular immunology

edit
 

Hello, Ashfaq Fazal. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Cellular immunology.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89(T·C) 03:31, 6 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Ashfaq Ahmad Shah (PhD scholar Immunology)

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ashfaq Ahmad Shah (PhD scholar Immunology) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hog Farm (talk) 14:46, 2 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:ASHFAQ AHMAD SHAH.jpg listed for discussion

edit
 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ASHFAQ AHMAD SHAH.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:13, 25 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Misuse of minor edits checkbox

edit

  Hi Dr. Ashfaq Ahmad Shah! I noticed that you recently marked edits as minor at Barelvi and Vaccine that were not. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 21:07, 21 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

January 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm Toddy1. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Barelvi, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 21:07, 21 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Barelvi, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. And please stop misusing the minor edits check box! A check to the minor edit box signifies that only superficial differences exist between the current and previous versions. That was not the case here.-- Toddy1 (talk) 20:52, 22 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Important Notice

edit

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

-- Toddy1 (talk) 21:00, 22 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

February 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm Kamilalibhat. An edit that you recently made to Ilyas Qadri seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Kammiltalk09:46, 20 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm McSly. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. McSly (talk) 12:57, 20 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Dr. Ashfaq Ahmad Shah

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Dr. Ashfaq Ahmad Shah, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:39, 9 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ashfaq Ahmad Shah moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Ashfaq Ahmad Shah, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 10:47, 9 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

April 2022

edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 10:49, 9 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Deb (talk) 11:27, 9 April 2022 (UTC)Reply