Discretionary sanctions

edit

Hi, Ashish413, welcome to Wikipedia. Please note that there are special rules for Indian articles, as outlined below:

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.  Bishonen | tålk 21:13, 26 June 2021 (UTC).Reply

Intention is doubt ful

edit

Ashish413 just go through the Baidya page. I have added six references. All are in consistent with my edit that Kayasthas are lower than Vaidya but Ekdalian may remove it. His intention is not good. He is a Bengali wikipedian as per his profile but still he don't show any effort to make the Bengali Kayastha page truthful. In that page it is written that "'Kayasthas are regarded as highest hindu caste"" (Baidya absent here) whearas the references I have given speak different.But he don't forget to include that Kayastha ranked next to Brahmin (See the history). Banglawikit (talk) 09:20, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

July 2021

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Doug Weller talk 18:26, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Reply