Your submission at Articles for creation: Fishtank.live (April 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 09:58, 25 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, AsyarSaronen! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 09:58, 25 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Fishtank (series) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fishtank (series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fishtank (series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

QuietHere (talk | contributions) 13:11, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hey AsyarSaronen I know this is your pet project article but please consider moving this to Draft:Fishtank (series) you run the risk of getting the article delete and losing the entire history. NYC Guru (talk) 07:31, 8 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for alerting this to me. I'll get to it soon. For now it is safe in the Wayback Machine. AsyarSaronen (talk) 07:58, 8 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Europa Universalis: The Price of Power (July 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Karnataka was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Karnataka (talk) 14:12, 9 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
wouldn't this also mean that the original Europa Universalis board game article doesn't meet the requirements of Wikipedia as well? I based my article off that one. AsyarSaronen (talk) 04:12, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Europa Universalis: The Price of Power

edit

  Hello, AsyarSaronen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Europa Universalis: The Price of Power, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:05, 9 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Introduction to contentious topics

edit

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:26, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

This edit is a violation of the WP:ECR sanction which is explained above. You cannot edit in the topic area of the Palestine/Israel conflict, except for making edit requests, until you have made 500 edits and your account is 30 days old. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:20, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ali ibn al-Musayyab (March 1)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 12:46, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ali ibn al-Musayyab has been accepted

edit
 
Ali ibn al-Musayyab, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 16:07, 21 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

A belated welcome!

edit
 
The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!  

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, AsyarSaronen! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! asilvering (talk) 16:09, 21 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

WP:ECR

edit

If you continue to violate WP:ECR as you did here you will be blocked from editing. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:00, 26 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry. I will say that the design of talk pages makes it hard to notice when there is a limit to who can discuss in the Talk pages. I guess I must also feel a sense of entitlement as I did contribute to the editing of that article during its Draft stage. AsyarSaronen (talk) 14:01, 26 October 2024 (UTC)Reply