Auchmill, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Auchmill! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 28 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Now as a table of links. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:17, 4 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

turning a list into columns

edit

In this edit I changed your list into columns in a nice CSS-type manner. You may like to try it. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:56, 29 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Barnstar

edit
  The Excellent New Editor's Barnstar

A new editor on the right path
Wow, 22 articles created in the last month; that is a solid effort even for experienced editors, but you are new to the game, which makes it even more impressive. And most of them are good, solid pieces of work. Well done; keep up your good work. Having just read your 22 articles (as part of new pages patrol), I can offer some pointers for your work to be even better with minimal extra effort. Schwede66 09:24, 5 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

As promised, here are some tips, sorted from the more important to the lesser 'issues':

  • The more substantial articles suffer from a lead that is too short. The lead is to summarise the main points of the article, and as such, it's best to write the article first. Once done, write the lead as an 'executive summary'. By the way, a lead doesn't need to be referenced (with very few exceptions); if it's referenced in the body, that's good enough. After all, the lead is just supposed to be the summary. WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY is a useful paragraph to read.
  • Many of your articles are somewhat underlinked. Have a look at WP:UNDERLINK.
  • Your referencing is pretty solid, which is unusual for a new editor. When you use the same reference several times but referring to different pages, you use the Refpage template, e.g. {{rp|23}}. As the documentation mentions, the use of shortened footnotes is more common, as it's more helpful for those who want to follow up on the references. It's simple to use once you've got your head around it. If you wish, I can convert one of your articles to shortened footnotes, doing edits step-by-step and explaining via the edit summaries what is going on. That way, you don't have to read up on the documentation.

That's all. Hope you appreciate some pointers. Schwede66 09:45, 5 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

User:Schwede66, I'll take all of those criticisms on the chin as defects in my work getting the team up and running. I suspect that I didn't even mention the lede. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:52, 5 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Didn't know you were behind all this, Stuart. Note that none of the above are criticisms, though. They are well-meant suggestions on how to do things even better. But good on you for 'taking responsibility'. Do you have other stars in your class? Schwede66 09:56, 5 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
I'm not really behind the work (they got external funding completely without my help), but I've been supplying the wikipedia expert-knowledge. User:Gracemckenzie has been doing lots of excellent work and User:Peata_likes_art got off to a great start. There's a coordination page at Wikipedia:WikiProject New Zealand/Requested articles/Craft. Stuartyeates (talk) 17:26, 5 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

User:Schwede66 Hey - thanks! I'm really enjoying it, and the team - me and User:Gracemckenzie and User:Peata_likes_art - are really enjoying it, and are looking forward to getting stuck in again for January. I'll take a look at those pointers; in particular, we're looking at going back and tidying up/expanding articles wwe're creating, so knowing to improve the lede is particularly helpful. If you could show me through shortened footnotes I'd be most grateful. Thanks again! Auchmill (talk) 18:43, 5 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

My pleasure. I've done most of the work on Pauline Rhodes. Go here and follow the diffs by clicking the "Next edit" links, all the while reading the edit summaries to see what I've done. Schwede66 19:58, 5 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

NZ artists

edit

Hi Auchmill - good to see a number of new articles on New Zealand artists - thanks for adding them to Wikipedia! If you are thinking of adding more, might I suggest some of the red links on {{Frances Hodgkins Fellowship}}? It would be good to have articles on the likes of Joanna Paul and Marilynn Webb. If not, that's fine - I'll get around to them myself sooner or later :) Thanks again! Grutness...wha? 23:16, 8 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hey Grutness - thanks for that! Yup, we're plugging away slowly. Our first focus was on [craft artists] and now after taking part in the Art+Feminism edit-a-thon we're looking to run a regular meet-up to support people to add more artist bios overall. Slowly but surely, huh?Auchmill (talk) 23:42, 8 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

That's the best way :) I work in the arts down here in Dunedin, so I know quite a few of the people who should have articles - which is both an advantage and a disadvantage in writing articles for them! Grutness...wha? 00:07, 10 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

A kitten for you!

edit
 

Thanks for organising the Edit-A-Thon!

Lanma726 (talk) 06:33, 11 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Lanma726 - Awwww, thanks!!Auchmill (talk) 08:15, 11 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Doris Lusk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St Mark's Square. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 14 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Please contact WMF

edit

Hello Auchmill, Please contact us at grantsadmin wikimedia.org regarding your Inspire Campaign submission. We would like to fund your request, but need some information before moving forward. We hope to hear from you soon. -- Thank you, Jtud (WMF) (talk) 00:23, 2 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wellington Wikipedia Meet Up - With Childcare

edit

Hi Auchmill, just wanted to let you know that I'd be keen to come along and assist if/when you do hold these meet ups. I am still fairly new at this but am no longer a beginner and am happy to pass on what I do know to anyone keen to learn. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you want to discuss. Ambrosia10 (talk) 04:35, 22 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

June 13 Editathon

edit

Thanks for the note on my talkpage Auchmill. I would love to come along and help out. I will definitely be able to be there for some of the day and hopefully may even be able to make the whole day if I can make alternative childcare/kids Saturday sport arrangements. I've got a laptop and am happy to pair up with beginner editors to give them an idea of "how to", although I'm still very much on the Wikipedia learning curve myself. Looking forward to it.Ambrosia10 (talk) 22:12, 24 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Burnside High School

edit

Hello! I am working on the russian version "Burnside High School" article, which currently has short history section in wikipedia. I am writing you to ask - is there a possibility for you to visit a National Library at Welligton and obtain an electronic copy of book "Choosing the right path : Burnside High School 1960-2010 / Paul O'Connor" (http://natlib.govt.nz/records/21643829), and put some information into the article? Also I can buy a hard copy of that book. Could you give me an advice, if it's possible? I'll be happy to get any version and any part of that book. Thank you for your time, --Voyagerim (talk) 13:27, 7 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hey Voyagerim. There doesn't appear to be a e-book of that publication. You can always contact the National Library directly if you want specific info from that book. I'm afraid I can't help out with this one Auchmill (talk) 04:41, 8 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Well, thank you anyway! --Voyagerim (talk) 05:11, 8 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Darcy Nicholas

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Darcy Nicholas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --Anarchyte 03:25, 13 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Art Jewelry Forum

edit

Hello, I am working on a pet project to help digitize information about the field of metalsmithing+jewelry. I started with making a page for Art jewelry forum (AJF), and have a list of artists that I would like to make pages for as well. The AJF page has been nominated for deletion because it is questioned if the organization is "notable". I am reaching out to you because I saw that you edited some pages that relate to studio craft, and thought you may have an informed opinion (unlike the mathematician who nominated the page for deletion) about whether or not it is a "notable organization". If you have an opinion, one way or another, please way in on the articles for deletion discussion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Art_jewelry_forumClarefinin (talk) 21:32, 11 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hey Clarefinin - I left a comment supporting the article's retention on the talk page. It's a solid article but doesn't really tell you much you can't glen by sifting around the website itself. I've been working on articles relating to New Zealand contemporary jewellery, a field I'm familiar with, but have focused on fleshing out artists, galleries and major exhibitions, and suggest you focus your attention in this way too, so you build up your track record. But kudos on a really well-argued defense of the deletion!Auchmill (talk) 03:23, 12 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Auchmill, Thanks for looking that over and voting keep. It's nice to know that similar people are working on similar projects! I think after this I'm going to work on artists, there is certainly more press about artists than publications! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clarefinin (talkcontribs) 12:19, 12 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Simon Denny (artist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Te Papa. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 1 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Rhana Devenport

edit

I noticed you recently created the article Rhana Devenport. The article is well-written and properly sourced, but the subject doesn't appear to meet Wikipedia notability guidelines. Perhaps you could add more information and sources to show the subject's notability? --SouthernNights (talk) 22:03, 20 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Kia ora SouthernNights, Following Stuartyeates advice below I've added links to further interviews and articles, and also started a list of publications. Devenport is the director of New Zealand's most significant public art gallery and a professional with a 25-year career in museums and I think meets the notability requirements - especially in light of Wikipedia's commitment to improving gender balance in its coverage.
I suggest reinforcing the article with references from http://innz.natlib.govt.nz/ , where a simple search turns up a number of articles with in depth coverage. See also http://viaf.org/viaf/192770980/ http://www.artandaustralia.com/magazine/issue-522/rhana-devenport Note that for references to be used for notability purposes, access to the articles is not actually necessary. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:14, 20 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Stuartyeates, will do Auchmill (talk) 22:33, 20 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alter / Image, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Kraus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 26 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

NZ on Screen

edit

I noticed you used a lot of NZ on Screen links recently. Please be aware that their status as a promotional agency makes them constitutionally unsuited for using as evidence of notability and they shouldn't be used for too many biographical facts. You may also find User talk:NZ On Screen sobering reading. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:02, 2 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Stuartyeates. I've looked again at the page and I've pointedly used non-NZonScreen references as much as possible - but the links to excerpts of Horrocks' documentaries on that site seem useful to me. I've also looked at that talk page previously and while I can see that those actions in 2008 are contra to the way Wikipedia works, I have some sympathy for them and personally agree that they are no more a promotional agecny than any other publicly funded operation seeking to make New Zealand cultural productions more accessible and better known.Auchmill (talk) 08:32, 2 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jenny Harper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Simon Denny. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 3 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Arapera Hineira Kaa Blank
added a link pointing to Waiapu
Keri Kaa
added a link pointing to Waiapu
Wi Kuki Kaa
added a link pointing to Waiapu

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 10 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gavin Hipkins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Samuel Butler. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 23 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paul Annear, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Edgar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 2 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Francis Upritchard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hackney. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 26 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your contributions

edit
 
 
Thank you for your contributions


120 new articles were created

Women in Photography worldwide online edit-a-thon

Our next events: Women in Entertainment and Women in Jewish History

--Ipigott (talk) 10:59, 2 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)

June 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Francis Upritchard may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [[Martino Gamper]] (also her husband) and jeweller [[Karl Fritsch (jeweller)]] | Karl Fritsch]]. In their 2009 exhibition ''Feierabend'' at Kate Macgarry was an early outing of their

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:16, 5 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Giovanni Intra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pasadena. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 16 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Reference errors on 24 July

edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 25 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Artist-run space, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cuba Street. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 25 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James Greig (potter), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bisque. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 10 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timeline of the Feminist art movement in New Zealand, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robin White. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:05, 19 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Removal of speedy deletion tags for Shannon Te Ao

edit

  Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Shannon Te Ao. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. MordeKyle (talk) 20:44, 30 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Auchmill. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

New Challenge for Oceania and Australia

edit

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Oceania/The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/The 5000 Challenge are up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. The Australia challenge would feed into the wider region one and potentially New Zealand could have a smaller challenge too. The main goal is content improvement, tackling stale old stubs and important content and improving sourcing/making more consistent but new articles are also welcome if sourced. I understand that this is a big goal for regular editors, especially being summertime where you are, but if you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Oceania and Australia like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1700 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for the region but fuelled by a series of contests to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. The Africa contest scaled worldwide would naturally provide great benefits to Oceania countries, particularly Australia and attract new editors. I would like some support from existing editors here to get the Challenges off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile and potentially bring about hundreds of improvements in a few weeks through a contest! Cheers.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

September 2017 at Women in Red

edit
 

Welcome to Women in Red's September 2017 worldwide online editathons.

 
 

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Ipigott (talk) 10:16, 31 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

September 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to New Zealand Wars. I noticed that when you added the image to the infobox, you added it as a thumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 04:25, 5 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Auchmill. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Doris de Pont has been accepted

edit
 
Doris de Pont, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

97198 (talk) 13:55, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for helping to expand and reference this draft! I've left a notification for the draft's original creator too. :) 97198 (talk) 13:59, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Thanks!!Auchmill (talk) 04:24, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Autopatrolled granted

edit
 

Hi Auchmill, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Schwede66 01:31, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Schwede66: Kia ora - thanks for that!Auchmill (talk) 04:23, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Auchmill. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Auchmill. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Yvonne Rust

edit

Hi Auchmill,

I saw your edit on Ngā Kaihanga Uku and I thought you might be able to help me. It's been a long time since I edited Wikipedia and a lot has changed. I'm trying to get the article Draft:Yvonne Rust published and i'm a bit overwhelmed by the policy about this. I wonder if you have any suggestions of things I can add to the article to make it publishable?

Robmint (talk) 21:13, 29 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Request for applications for position of Wikipedian-at-Large, Aotearoa New Zealand

edit

Kia ora! The Wikimedia Aotearoa New Zealand User Group invites you to read about the call for applications for a Wikipedian-at-Large for Aotearoa New Zealand in 2024. Group members are happy to explain the process and discuss ideas with interested editors.

Sent by Zippybonzo on behalf of MurielMary using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 06:36, 24 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to an in-person meetup in Mohua / Golden Bay

edit
 
Golden Bay Air are holding some seats for us until 21 November

Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in Golden Bay / Mohua! Details are on the meetup page. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them.

Golden Bay is hard to get to and the airline flying into Tākaka uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to Wellington and we are offering attendees a $200 travel subsidy to help with costs.

Be in touch with Schwede66 if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics. Schwede66 09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply