AustrianFreedom

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Newyorkbrad (talk) 00:24, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

A page you created has been deleted as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Bishonen | talk 00:25, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bishonen | talk 00:28, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AustrianFreedom (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

look at my official website: Richard Saringer - Actor / LINKS

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 10:35, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AustrianFreedom (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

User page: Wikipedia does not have a user page with this exact name?

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:50, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AustrianFreedom (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

User page: Wikipedia does not have a user page with this exact name? and Evidence of Truth I wrote in Jabuka and Bor articles

Decline reason:

Incomprehensible. Nothing here addresses your conduct on the English Wikipedia or the reasons for the block. Huon (talk) 21:24, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Declined requests cannot be removed while blocked, I have restored them, and also placed new posts at the bottom as is standard practice. 331dot (talk) 13:16, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Thank You Very Much! I'm really angry at the German Wikipedians. It would help the Wikipedia in general, if it asks all users to identify themselves on their page with real names. People without pseudonyms are then much more honorably forced into ENCYCLOPEDIC truthfulness. User (Group) Špajdelj originally wrote 150 Jewish victims in the German-language article. Most of the descendants of Jabuka know that it is a complete lie. I also know enough actors who wrote their German-language Wikipedia article themselves. Pseudonyms make everything possible! This is undemocratic fascist censorship. Some of them even supported by friends. What's up with politicians, industrialists? Should we negotiate this before the EU Court?--AustrianFreedom (talk) 17:16, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

I have to have the freedom to design my user site the way I want it. I do not have to apologize for suddenly becoming the lead author in an article. I just prepared very well for it. In the case of Pančevo - Jabuka, these are years of research in addition to my family background. Let me know by Email, when I am not more blocked again. I know the way to Strasbourg very well.--AustrianFreedom (talk) 17:25, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

And last but not least: I Shall Never Go Back Into German Wikipedia.--AustrianFreedom (talk) 17:26, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

I interpret "I know the way to Strasbourg", where the European Court of Human Rights is located, as a legal threat. Legal threats are not permitted; you can pursue your grievances in the courts or on Wikipedia, but not both. If you choose to use the courts, you will remain blocked until the legal action is resolved or you clearly withdraw the threat. 331dot (talk) 17:32, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

I am also willing to have a completely white user site if someone can not handle these harmless games. Merkel and Steinmeier have other problems: the truth does not stop you! However, I'm not a esoteric-psychopathic coward hiding in an embassy or fleeing to Russia. I'm not an esoteric either. Every secret service can walk in my computer as often as he wants. I have nothing to hide myself. In the internet age, lies can be spread much faster but the truth too.--AustrianFreedom (talk) 18:00, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

VERY PERSONAL STATEMENT ACCORDING TO MY GRANDFATHER AND MY PUTIN JOKES: When I turned 18, my mother gave me a double-sided paper from my grandfather telling me to read it and then destroy it. In Russian captivity, my grandfather was interrogated several times and has given sufficient information for his release in December 1945! However, if you read that there is a certain little Merkel, then you have to think carefully how to deal with it. Apart from that, I would not flee to Russia, China, North Korea, Iran, Saudi Arabia or Erdogan Empire. But world conspiracy theorists are constantly attacking the US and DEMOCRATIC STATE OF ISRAEL. Although these states and other friendly regimes can not even spell the word democracy starting with the first letter. In Germany, they are more sophisticated: there it is called data protection, the constitutional protection and BND as an informal self-determinationSince reunification they have become even more dangerous, STASI reputations and megalomania are flourishing. How good that the Allies never gave them a peace treaty like the Austrians. In Austria, especially right-wing radicals celebrate with the Eu hymn. Now they are reconnected without Hitler and offer the German South Tyroleans Austrian citizenship as the Hungarians do. The EU survives only if Austrians and Germans are kept in check.--AustrianFreedom (talk) 18:35, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

• I'm not sure what this is, but has nothing to do with requesting unblock, so I am removing talk page access, if your open request is declined, this will leave you with using WP:UTRS to request unblock should you choose to stop this behavior. 331dot (talk) 18:48, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Talk page access revoked

I don't know what you are doing, but it has no place here. Talk page access has been revoked. If your existing unblock request is declined (and only if it is declined), that leaves you with WP:UTRS as your final avenue toward being unblocked. I strongly suggest you read and understand WP:GAB before you use UTRS, because any further posts like the ones you've been making here, and you'll lose access there, too. --Yamla (talk) 18:48, 1 July 2019 (UTC)