User talk:Awesome Aasim/Archive 21
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page (new section).
Archive navigation: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 |
Press Ctrl+F (Windows) or ⌘ Command+F (Mac) to find a discussion on this page. |
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
editYou were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
editYou were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:31, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
XFDvoter
editYoure user script that allows people to vote on XFD discussions is not working Nagol0929 (talk) 22:11, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Nagol0929 Can you link to an example? Thanks. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 22:57, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
- I cant get any Afds to work on iPad safari when it used to work. Nagol0929 (talk) 23:03, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Awesome Aasim more specifically when i press the buttons on pc or iPad safari they dont do anything. Nagol0929 (talk) 12:17, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
- I cant get any Afds to work on iPad safari when it used to work. Nagol0929 (talk) 23:03, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 August 2023
edit- From the editor: Beta version of signpost.news now online
- News and notes: You like RecentChanges?
- In the media: Taking it sleazy
- Recent research: The five barriers that impede "stitching" collaboration between Commons and Wikipedia
- Draftspace: Bad Jokes and Other Draftspace Novelties
- Humour: The Dehumourification Plan
- Traffic report: Raise your drinking glass, here's to yesterday
Administrators' newsletter – September 2023
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2023).
|
|
- Following an RfC, TFAs will be automatically semi-protected the day before it is on the main page and through the day after.
- A discussion at WP:VPP about revision deletion and oversight for dead names found that
[s]ysops can choose to use revdel if, in their view, it's the right tool for this situation, and they need not default to oversight. But oversight could well be right where there's a particularly high risk to the person. Use your judgment
.
- Special:Contributions now shows the user's local edit count and the account's creation date. (T324166)
- The SmallCat dispute case has closed. As part of the final decision, editors participating in XfD have been reminded to be careful about forming
local consensus which may or may not reflect the broader community consensus
. Regular closers of XfD forums were also encouraged tonote when broader community discussion, or changes to policies and guidelines, would be helpful
.
- Tech tip: The "Browse history interactively" banner shown at the top of Special:Diff can be used to easily look through a history, assemble composite diffs, or find out what archive something wound up in.
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
editYou were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:30, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
editYou were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:31, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical) § File bug with authors who have redlinks. I've narrowed down this error to your script, which caused a bug in the media viewer. QuickQuokka [talk • contribs] 19:51, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 September 2023
edit- In the media: "Just flirting", going Dutch and Shapps for the defence?
- Obituary: Nosebagbear
- Featured content: Catching up
- Traffic report: Some of it's magic, some of it's tragic
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
editYou were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:30, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 3 October 2023
edit- News and notes: Wikimedia Endowment financial statement published
- Recent research: Readers prefer ChatGPT over Wikipedia; concerns about limiting "anyone can edit" principle "may be overstated"
- Featured content: By your logic,
- Poetry: "The Sight"
Administrators' newsletter – September 2023
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2023).
|
|
- An RfC is open regarding amending the paid-contribution disclosure policy to add the following text:
Any administrator soliciting clients for paid Wikipedia-related consulting or advising services not covered by other paid-contribution rules must disclose all clients on their userpage.
- Administrators can now choose to add the user's user page to their watchlist when changing the usergroups for a user. This works both via Special:UserRights and via the API. (T272294)
- The 2023 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process has concluded with the appointment of one new CheckUser.
- Self-nominations for the electoral commission for the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections opens on 2 October and closes on 8 October.
XFD Voting Tool odd error
editFor a couple of days when I attempt to !vote a get a failure. A small box pops up top right hand corner of the article, with an error that is gone too fast to note. Your thoughts would be appreciated 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 17:18, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Timtrent do you know which page this is happening on? Awesome Aasim 17:24, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
- So far on any pages where I have tried to offer a!vote or comment. Example is Fela Akinse. Started recently 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 21:22, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
- "One of the parameters Title and paged is required" (or very similar wording)
- That is the popup error 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 21:31, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
- Ahhh! Let me try to fix it! Awesome Aasim 22:36, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Timtrent Does it work now? Awesome Aasim 22:42, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, thank you. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 06:57, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
- So far on any pages where I have tried to offer a!vote or comment. Example is Fela Akinse. Started recently 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 21:22, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Edit modification request
editHi. awesome Aasim, now that you're more active these days, can U please handle my request at talk:Microsoft Office?197.2.133.187 (talk) 03:19, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
editYou were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Your userpage
editI have questions concerning your edit:
- Shouldn't the section read "That Could Have Been Used" instead of "That Could Have Use"?
- How long will the "seven years" going to last?
Signed by 102.159.92.5 (talk) 02:21, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- I don't think it matters too much. Now it is 11 years. I tried to figure out why but couldn't really come up with a good reason, except maybe accessibility. In any case, I think any major icon change should be when redesigning for the future. Codex is going to be a big change for messages and icons. Can't wait for that. Awesome Aasim 02:31, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- awesome Aasim, I realised that you 4got the wp:ORANGELOCK and the wp:BLUELOCK on your userpage. Please add them.197.26.160.169 (talk) 18:44, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
"🔞" listed at Redirects for discussion
editThe redirect 🔞 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 16 § 🔞 until a consensus is reached. Thryduulf (talk) 18:28, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Request for template(s) for split/merge/creation/deletion
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Goodday awesome Aasim. Due to a recent mishap/conflict involving me, in an attempt to propose a template split, which I may understand that I might have missed out several regulations, I had figured out that the best solution is to have (an)other user(s), who "mainly edit tech-related articles", including U, to decide what to do with the below templates.197.14.103.60 (talk) 09:51, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- Template:Latest stable software release/Microsoft Office
- Template:Latest stable software release/Microsoft Office 2011
- Template:Latest stable software release/Microsoft Office 2011 for Mac
- Template:Latest stable software release/Microsoft Office 2013
- Template:Latest stable software release/Microsoft Office 2016
- Template:Latest stable software release/Microsoft Office 2016 for Mac
- Template:Latest stable software release/Microsoft Office 2019
- Template:Latest stable software release/Microsoft Office 2019 for Mac
- Template:Latest stable software release/Microsoft Office 2021
- Template:Latest stable software release/Microsoft Office 2021 for Mac
- Template:Latest stable software release/Microsoft Entourage
- Template:Latest stable software release/Microsoft Exchange Server
- Template:Latest stable software release/Microsoft Picture It!
- Template:Latest stable software release/Microsoft Visual Studio
PS: Do take your time to decide the current status of each template.
Look, I will not be responsible after that dispute happened. I am literally handing this responsibility over to you, instead of me. Do whatever you want to do with them. I just do not want any more problems happening to me as I do not have much knowledge about template handling, specifically the LSSR section, as much as you do.197.14.103.60 (talk) 15:00, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
This is clearly not ready for submission. If you wish to improve the draft, please do so, but do not submit drafts in this state. BD2412 T 18:48, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- I thought I added a tag that puts the draft header... hmm.... Awesome Aasim 18:49, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- Ahhh - So G13 only applies to submitted drafts. ohhh... got it. :D Awesome Aasim 18:50, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- No, G13 applies to all drafts, but this draft was last edited only three months ago, so G13 is not a concern. The tag you added was to submit the draft for review, which would have been a waste of reviewer time in its current state. BD2412 T 19:15, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- Huh? I thought {{subst:afc draft}} brings up the message "draft article currently not submitted". I agree it would be a waste of reviewer time to put "submitted" and let a reviewer decline it. Awesome Aasim 19:18, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- Oh, then the mistake was mine. My apologies, I thought you added the submission template. I have restored your edit. BD2412 T 20:52, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- Huh? I thought {{subst:afc draft}} brings up the message "draft article currently not submitted". I agree it would be a waste of reviewer time to put "submitted" and let a reviewer decline it. Awesome Aasim 19:18, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- No, G13 applies to all drafts, but this draft was last edited only three months ago, so G13 is not a concern. The tag you added was to submit the draft for review, which would have been a waste of reviewer time in its current state. BD2412 T 19:15, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- Ahhh - So G13 only applies to submitted drafts. ohhh... got it. :D Awesome Aasim 18:50, 18 October 2023 (UTC)