Badehmasare

Your submission at Articles for creation: Provence Honey has been accepted

Provence Honey, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 19:15, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Juan Carlos Reyna (February 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by L293D was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Juan Carlos Reyna and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Juan Carlos Reyna, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

L293D (☎ • ✎) 13:01, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Charbelfakhoury! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! L293D (☎ • ✎) 13:01, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Austrian Economics Master URJC (February 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by L293D was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Austrian Economics Master URJC and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Austrian Economics Master URJC, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

L293D (☎ • ✎) 16:01, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Basic Attention Token has been accepted

Basic Attention Token, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Dial911 (talk) 21:54, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1896–1897 Greek Macedonian rebellion has been accepted

1896–1897 Greek Macedonian rebellion, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 09:12, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Local service delivery has been accepted

Local service delivery, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 12:48, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Your AfD submission Draft:NMS Rechinul

Hi Charbelfakhoury, I have removed your nomination for deletion on Draft:NMS Rechinul. The Articles for Deletion is reserved for mainspace articles. Drafts are nominated at WP:Miscellany for deletion. Please follow the instructions there and complete your nomination with appropriate reasons if you still want the draft deleted. Thanks, MT Train^Talk 18:00, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nowhera Shaik has been accepted

Nowhera Shaik, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 22:42, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tolani Fatilewa has been accepted

Tolani Fatilewa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 00:29, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Constructive Development (biology) has been accepted

Constructive Development (biology), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Ravenswing 05:49, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eric Geyer (March 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MadeYourReadThis was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eric Geyer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Eric Geyer, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MadeYourReadThis (talk) 15:06, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to join WikiProject Dinosaurs

Hi Charbelfakhoury,

Welcome! You are receiving this message because we've noticed your great edits related to our project WikiProject Dinosaurs!. We are a group of editors working on improving articles in the scope of this project, and we need your help to meet the project goals. Please come over to our project page to take a look!

• You will see a list of articles that need most improvement .
• You will find a group of editors who share similar interest with you.
• Overall, this is a friendly place to discuss any issues related to Dinosaurs, ask questions, and collaborate on improving articles on Dinosaurs!

Feel free to put your name on the project member list. Hope you will have fun here, let us know if you need any help! Bobo.03 (talk) 19:50, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk page comments

Hello, Charbelfakhoury. Your recent additions [1] [2] to user talk pages appear to be incomprehensible non-English. What is the purpose or your intent with these? — CactusWriter ^(talk) 17:15, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

CactusWriter Nevermind. kissaker (talk) 20:27, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

On the english wikipedia, we communicate in english. I have no idea what you are trying to communicate here, or here. SQL^{Query me!} 19:22, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

@CactusWriter: @SQL: Fwiw, it's this not that the translations bring any more light to it. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 19:42, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

lol kissaker (talk) 20:12, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. The persistent addition of indecipherable non-English comments (despite requests for explanation and your refusal to comply) is considered disruptive. I suggest that you review Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 22:11, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

tayeb moss w ntk ya mstl. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.135.80.213 (talk) 05:35, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

So, if you are unable, or are unwilling to communicate in english - you will very likely end up blocked indefinitely. SQL^{Query me!} 05:46, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

who? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.135.80.213 (talk) 06:26, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

@SQL: wow i can't believe you're so racist you only want me to talk in english. Rude. kissaker (talk) 09:16, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Badehmasare That was absolutely uncalled for. We are asking you as a courtesy to communicate in a way which others in the dedicated language of any given project are able to understand. I'd recommend redacting and apologizing for your nasty comments per WP:NPA. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:14, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Chrissymad Nasty comments? lol. kissaker (talk) 18:17, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User:Chrissymad. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 18:24, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Drewmutt Can you explain to me where I attacked her? kissaker (talk) 18:26, 17 July 2018 (UTC) @Drewmutt: my man why are you ignoring me you're breaking my heart </3 :( kissaker (talk) 13:03, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018 - blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  - TNT ^💖 21:44, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Badehmasare (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

User:Drewmutt said that I attacked User:Chrissymad personally even though I didn't and asked him to clarify where I attacked her and refused to answer me. So I shouldn't be bocked.

Decline reason:

You called another user a racist above. You will need to address this if you choose to make another unblock request. I am declining this request. 331dot (talk) 09:33, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{unblock | reason= @331dot: Yeah and that was wrong to say but after that I got a warning that if I make ANOTHER personal attack I will be blocked, and I didn't.}

• If you are just addressing me, your comment should not be an unblock request. If you choose to make another request, it will be reviewed by someone else. You did not seem to recognize that you had made a personal attack, as you asked "Can you explain to me where I attacked her?". That would suggest that the behavior would continue. I also think that if you make another unblock request you should address your non-English postings. This is the English Wikipedia, communication in English that others can understand is mandatory. If English is not your primary language, there is likely a version of Wikipedia in a language that you are more comfortable with. 331dot (talk) 09:46, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

@331dot: Yeah I asked where I attacked user:chrissymad because I didn't. kissaker (talk) 09:51, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Badehmasare (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

After I called a user racist I got a warning that I shouldn't personally attack users so I didn't attack anyone again but I got blocked regardless.

Decline reason:

This does not address the concerns above. Yamla (talk) 11:01, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@331dot: For the record, the block wasn't just for the talk page nonsense where he called SQL a racist but the content which he was adding elsewhere which was the equivalent of something....very nasty in several places (I asked a native arab speaker to translate.) CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 10:44, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

UTRS appeal #58511

is open. If this request is acceptable, and if we can unblock, user can them request unlocking. Pinging stakeholders. I will copy this below for your consideration.

@TheresNoTime, CactusWriter, 331dot, and SQL:

• Why should you be unblocked?

  My account was blocked 4 years ago because in my last edits I was responsible for insults and trolling other users which after seeing them now make me feel ashamed of what I did and wished that it never happened. And the thing is I was a very good contributor to wikipedia by making more than 500 constructive edits by improving a lot of articles and even creating articles with good content and references. But in the end after I became an extended confirmed user I started trolling some users and became immature and childish which again I really regret. So I plead to you to unblock my account because I really want to make constructive edits again and help expand wikipedia. Please forgive my last immature actions I really want to make my account good again.

• Deepfriedokra 2022-05-17 18:45:02 Well, this is rather complicated. I will need to ask the blocking admin. And the declining admins. If they agree to unblocking, you might be able to persuade the Stewards to unlock you.
• Deepfriedokra 2022-05-17 18:50:28 Has your English improved to the point you will not expect others to communicate in Arabic (or whatever that was)?

  badehmasare 2022-05-17 18:50:29 Okay thank you hope it works.

  badehmasare 2022-05-17 18:51:04 Yes I am proficient in English.

• Deepfriedokra 2022-05-17 18:52:42 Please understand I am not being harsh. You have a really difficult climb ahead if you are to convince anyone to unblock you. You might want to request help on IRC chat at https://web.libera.chat/?channel=#wikipedia-en-unblock

  badehmasare 2022-05-17 18:53:40 Thing is I cannot log in to the account to appeal my block so this is the best site I could find.

• Deepfriedokra 2022-05-17 18:55:47 I've been told this is really rude-- " er bikesk ya jahsh bade messesk yeh w edhcho bi 3as3ousk ya ebn el ahbe. kissaker " Please translate.

• (elipse)

  badehmasare 2022-05-17 18:57:18 Oh man it is, I am really sorry I ever said this. It means: "(omitted. really, really bad)".

  badehmasare 2022-05-17 18:59:23 I was being a smartass and edgy and I am really sorry.

• Deepfriedokra 2022-05-17 19:05:25 Please understand that at least one of the people you said that to is incredibly disinclined to unblock you.

  badehmasare 2022-05-17 19:06:28 I really regret it, it was a very bad thing to say hope they forgive me.

--Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:27, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

@Deepfriedokra: I've left a comment at the relevant UTRS. While I am inclined to assume good faith here, that the user has matured over the last four years, I'm also concerned about this account being globally locked as an LTA, and if that's something we'd need to overcome first? SQL^{Query Me!} 05:39, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

I was thinking about that last evening during my walk. There may be more here than we have seen, Will ask. Badehmasare, if you are some ' LTA, I'll find out eventually. 😜 --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:14, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

User has been unlocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:37, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

restore TPA --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:57, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

When I return, I will write up an unblock request and present it at WP:AN. I just need to write a preamble. You already did the hard part. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:31, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Badehmasare: Let me ask you this directly, here. @RoySmith has found technical evidence (presumably from site logs) that they have mentioned here, that you have another account, Cookiefinger. Do you have an explanation for this? SQL^{Query Me!} 03:34, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Yeah I created it after I was blocked but I made contributions to it. wikipedian (talk) 07:04, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

I want to stop using the other account and use this one that is why I appeales the block and lock. wikipedian (talk) 07:07, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

What should I do now?

You might want to withdraw before there is a pile on of declines. Don't edit or sock for six months and try again. You need to deal with the block evasion at that time. The unblock request per se was pretty good. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:15, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Okay thank you wikipedian (talk) 12:39, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

My pleasure. reveiwing and composing. I type slow --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:59, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Posted. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:40, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Mooted. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:19, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Badehmasare. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- RoySmith (talk) 12:20, 21 May 2022 (UTC)