User talk:Balance3641

Welcome!

Hi Balance3641! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage, or you can always find a task here:

Search the Task Center

Happy editing! Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 09:26, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: NBA Europe has been accepted

NBA Europe, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 11:34, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

August 2026

Hello, I'm CheeseAndJamSamdwich. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to User talk:Бревенчатая таверна have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. CheeseAndJamSamdwich (talk) 13:27, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Yeah my bad, was just playing around a bit, I'd originally reported him too. Sorry about that, no ill intentions Balance3641 (talk) 13:29, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi Balance3641. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

• Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits. For more information about when rollback is appropriate, see Wikipedia:Rollback § When to use rollback.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the permission will be revoked.
• Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!

I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, and feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate use of rollback. If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:Rollback. Good luck and thanks! EdJohnston (talk) 15:26, 3 September 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:Prince Denmark De Luna

Hello Balance3641, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Prince Denmark De Luna, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 applies only to article space, not drafts. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 06:34, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

Hi, I am sorry about that. I'm curious what the options are for drafts like that that are clearly never going to be accepted for AfC and are just nonsense, if the procedure is to allow it to go to AfC or is there another CSD that works. I'll make sure to review the criteria more thoroughly. Balance3641 🍃 (talk · contribs) 06:37, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

Leave useless drafts alone. That essay talks about MFD nominations, but is also applicable here. Draft space is a place for editors to work on material that is not yet ready for article space. As such none of the A series of speedy deletion criteria apply as they are for Article space. Unless the draft is actively harmful such as a hoax, or attack page, then it is best to leave it alone. If it does get improved and accepted through AFC, then hooray! We have a new article. If it doesn't then eventually, it will get tagged for WP:G13 (there's a bot for that) and get deleted. -- Whpq (talk) 12:22, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

Cheers, thank you. Will do Balance3641 🍃 (talk · contribs) 13:07, 4 September 2026 (UTC)