March 2020

edit
 

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have an undisclosed financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

  • Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
  • State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
  • Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future. MER-C 18:08, 7 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BaneAlpha (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm aware that I did not follow the rules of Wikipedia, especially when it comes to paid contributions. I've read the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, and I confirm that I will stick to these rules in the future. I'm the part of digital marketing company called Alpha Efficiency, and I will use this page to add factual information about our clients (only those supported by independent sources). Also, I plan to make some updates in my spare time, mostly about sports. I hope that you would give me another chance because my mistakes were not the consequence of bad intentions, but because of not fully comprehending a Terms of Use.

Decline reason:

Oh goodness no. We aren't interested in what your clients wish to say about themselves. Yamla (talk) 17:13, 19 March 2020 (UTC):Reply

Sorry, but I think that you misunderstood me. All my paid edits will be disclosed in the future. For all my edits in future, I will use references from relevant sources. I admit that I made a mistake, and I want to fix it. An article that I created was badly written and undisclosed. If I get unblocked, I want to resolve COI, remove all promotional content, edit references using the help of other editors, and then submit edited article for review. BaneAlpha (talk) 16:54, 23 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.