Welcome to WP. You have added several cats to articles about Turkish music or musicians. Thanks. However some of the cats are red (ie, they don't exist in WP) like Turkish makam music. Why don't you create these cats. Cheers.Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 12:45, 24 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Abdurrahman Bahir Efendi (Arabzade)

edit
 

The article Abdurrahman Bahir Efendi (Arabzade) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.  Crown Prince  Talk 12:48, 24 October 2013 (UTC)  Crown Prince  Talk 12:48, 24 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

The resource is a digital encyclopedia(mus2okur). I have edited my entry. I am just learning how to contribute. I appreciate feedback. BarisBozkurtBahcesehir

Welcome

edit

I appreciate your efforts. I suggest you read the following.

If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 13:25, 24 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of A. Bâki Çallıoğlu

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on A. Bâki Çallıoğlu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Foodie (talk) 16:07, 24 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Şevki Bey

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Şevki Bey requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Foodie (talk) 16:08, 24 October 2013 (UTC) Reply

 
Hello, BarisBozkurtBahcesehir. You have new messages at Nedim Ardoğa's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dictionary definitions

edit

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a dictionary. Entries consisting of a mere fragment of a sentence defining what a thing is without any further expansion are often deleted, especially if they are copied verbatim from another website. Please refrain from creating such articles in the future. Rather than creating lots of little articles about all sorts of different musical genres, perhaps expanding the existing Music of Turkey article to reference some of these styles (in that article, a short one sentence description of each style would be fitting)? WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:33, 4 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the feedback but I don't understand: if there is a definition of a term, should we not put it in Wikipedia? is it better that a definition does not exist? Music of Turkey if too broad to contain all term related to it. I try to create an organised network of terms: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Turkish_makam_music that is then linked to the main description. For example, when I put the definition of a musical form (one sentence) and link to the category, this will also make the category more complete. (Baris)

No. If all you have is a definition, it is better to put it into Wiktionary instead. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:58, 4 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

November 2013

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of two weeks for sock puppetry. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Bbb23 (talk) 02:22, 18 November 2013 (UTC)Reply