Barnebykerry

May 2020

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to The Night Is Still Young (Nicki Minaj song), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 08:17, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MariaJaydHicky. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Blueberry72 (talk) 18:07, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Black Kite (talk) 19:25, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

@Keith D: can you please revert Aoi's edit on the Tulisa page as they’ve accused me of being a sock, when I got blocked for disruptive editing when I had stopped editing after we spoke on your talk page? Barnebykerry (talk) 20:26, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello, sorry but I am not getting involved by reverting their edits when you have been blocked for disruptive edits. Keith D (talk) 20:30, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Barnebykerry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was originally blocked for disruptive editing, however the page I had done it on, I had stopped after I got a warning and promise from now in on, if I get unblocked to only make sensible edits. Barnebykerry (talk) 20:32, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You claim you stopped your disruptive editing after you got a warning. I have determined that is false. You made numerous additional disruptive edits after you were warned, necessitating several more warnings and then eventually a block. As you have tried to mislead us, I am declining your unblock request. Yamla (talk) 11:53, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: I was referring to the one from Blueberry72, SummerPhDv2.0 went through changing the correct things I had added back to before I had added it for some unknown reason, I'm sorry for disruptive editing and if I got a second chance I'd promise I've seen the error of my ways and would seek help from more experienced users to take me under their wing and help me out. Barnebykerry (talk) 12:58, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Appeal

Black Kite I’m sorry for my disruptive editing, I did stop editing on the page after I got a warning, if I promise to be a good editor please may my edit privileges be reinstated? Barnebykerry (talk) 21:46, 15 May 2020 (UTC)