User talk:Bbarmadillo/Archive 4

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: BUX (brokerage) has been accepted

edit
 
BUX (brokerage), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MrClog (talk) 15:03, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
@MrClog: Thank you for reviewing it! --Bbarmadillo (talk) 18:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

December with Women in Red

edit
 
Women in Red | December 2020, Volume 6, Issue 12, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 182, 183


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

  Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:43, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Old North Church (Marblehead), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page First Congregational Church.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 7 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Music Business Worldwide has been accepted

edit
 
Music Business Worldwide, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

  Kadzi  (talk) 20:49, 14 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Dr. Kadzi: Thank you for reviewing and accepting this contribution. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 21:12, 14 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Joanne Wilson

edit

I can't help thinking that the article is considerably excessive in view of the accomplishments. Perhaps it could be fixed by not including mere listings as awards, (and converting the table into a list--because of accessability problems tables are deprecated unless necessary), i'm moving those items in the bibliography that discuss her into references in the usual format, , and possible decreasing the rather extreme number of references, too many of which are barely disguised PR, and from sources which are mainly devoted to publishing press releases. I couldd o it myself, but you probably could do it better DGG ( talk ) 06:51, 21 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Created a thread at WP:Cleanup. Not sure that I can do it with the right attitude. -- --Bbarmadillo (talk) 18:52, 21 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Music Business Worldwide has been accepted

edit
 
Music Business Worldwide, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 04:02, 26 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
@DGG: Thank you for reviewing and accepting it! --Bbarmadillo (talk) 20:48, 26 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

A New Year With Women in Red!

edit
 
 
Women in Red | January 2021, Volume 7, Issue 1, Numbers 182, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

  Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:01, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Big Blue Ocean Cleanup has been accepted

edit
 
Big Blue Ocean Cleanup, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 01:25, 2 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Atlantic306: Thank you for reviewing and accepting this contribution. Seasonal greetings to you! I wish you all the best in 2021. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 07:28, 2 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: FarmWise has been accepted

edit
 
FarmWise, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hatchens (talk) 07:46, 16 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Hatchens: Thank you for reviewing and accepting it. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 07:55, 16 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Bbarmadillo, I've accepted it but not reviewed it. The article still needs to get reviewed by a reviewer. Wishing you all the best. - Hatchens (talk) 14:38, 16 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Discussion

edit

Hello Bbarmadillo, I have seen that the published page Stefano Fantoni is marked for cleanup. I am new to Wikipedia and I was wondering if the issues of "cleanup" and "lead" have already been solved, or when they will be addressed. Rfantoni (talk) 10:28, 27 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Rfantoni you better ask these questions at WP:CLEANUP page. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 20:45, 27 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello Bbarmadillo thank you for taking care of the page about Stefano Fantoni. In rewriting the "lead" I noticed that there is a punctuation mistake: "In this context he gave four main contributionsIn the seventies he has been the author ..." should read " In this context he gave four main contributions. In the seventies he has been the author ...". Can you take care of correcting it? Best regards Rfantoni (talk) 21:33, 29 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Fixed. The article is still too long. You can try to shorten it yourself. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 18:45, 1 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Dear Bbarmadillo I don't think I can edit the article anymore since I am the recipient of a COI. But I am not an expert on Wikipedia; do you think that I can edit it nevertheless Rfantoni (talk) 22:12, 1 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Rfantoni removing your own edits shouldn't be a problem per WP:COIADVICE. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 18:07, 2 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

February 2021 at Women in Red

edit
 
Women in Red | February 2021, Volume 7, Issue 2, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 189, 190, 191


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

  Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 14:58, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Your submission at Articles for creation: LastObject (January 31)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Davisonio was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Craig Davison (talk) 22:06, 31 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Bbarmadillo! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Craig Davison (talk) 22:06, 31 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Craig Davison thank you for reviewing the article. I asked for a more detailed feedback (if possible) at the article's Talk page. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 07:37, 1 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

March 2021 at Women in Red

edit
 
Women in Red | March 2021, Volume 7, Issue 3, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 192, 193


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

  Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:47, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

April editathons from Women in Red

edit
 
Women in Red | April 2021, Volume 7, Issue 4, Numbers 184, 188, 194, 195, 196


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

  Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter


--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:15, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

AfC notification: Draft:7shifts has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:7shifts. Thanks! CNMall41 (talk) 19:39, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:7shifts has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:7shifts. Thanks! CNMall41 (talk) 21:32, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Mark G. Swenson has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mark G. Swenson. Thanks! versacespacetalk to me 14:40, 28 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark G. Swenson has been accepted

edit
 
Mark G. Swenson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

versacespacetalk to me 18:38, 28 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
VersaceSpace thank you for accepting it. -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 20:00, 28 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject India's Collaborations of the month invites you

edit

You're specially invited to join the WikiProject India's Collaboration of the month program.

The collaboration will help promote many articles to the good and featured article status, but to do so, we need your help! For further information, see the main page of the collaboration.

Sign up for this collaboration by listing your username under the participants section and regularly participating in the collaboration. If you have already signed, please ignore this message.

You can discuss this newsletter here.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.

Sent by Hulgedtalk⟩ on behalf of WikiProject India. Thank you!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:10, 29 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 7shifts (March 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GSS was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
GSS💬 07:31, 30 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vitaliy Katsenelson (March 31)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Scope creep was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
scope_creepTalk 18:40, 31 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harold D. Foster has been accepted

edit
 
Harold D. Foster, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 19:41, 14 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
Theroadislong thank you for accepting it! --Bbarmadillo (talk) 18:38, 15 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

GAN in progress for Hanyu

edit

There is currently a GAN review for his article taking place here [1]. Could I suggest adding your comments on the GAN review page and taking your merge discussion there instead of starting a separate discussion. All comments welcome. ErnestKrause (talk) 18:16, 27 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

ErnestKrause this is not my war, sorry. You can remove the tag if you feel like it. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 18:20, 27 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

May 2021 at Women in Red

edit
 
Women in Red | May 2021, Volume 7, Issue 5, Numbers 184, 188, 197, 198


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

  Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 21:35, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Damien Echols (born 1974) has been accepted

edit
 
Damien Echols (born 1974), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

- The9Man (Talk) 19:08, 20 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
@The9Man: thank you for accepting it. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 19:49, 20 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

June 2021 at Women in Red

edit
 
Women in Red | June 2021, Volume 7, Issue 6, Numbers 184, 188, 196, 199, 200, 201


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

  Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:49, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

New article

edit

I read Draft:upGrad. I do not work on educational institutions and is not the right person to help you. Cheers. - Chandan Guha (talk) 10:52, 30 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Chandan Guha: Thanks for taking a look at it. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 13:26, 30 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Lasercare Clinics Harrogate

edit

  Hello, Bbarmadillo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lasercare Clinics Harrogate, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 4 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Quality Logo Products

edit

  Hello, Bbarmadillo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Quality Logo Products, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 4 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Moonfare

edit

  Hello, Bbarmadillo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Moonfare, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 4 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: LastObject has been accepted

edit
 
LastObject, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Modussiccandi (talk) 12:53, 19 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Modussiccandi: Thank you for accepting this contribution! --Bbarmadillo (talk) 12:35, 27 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

July 2021 at Women in Red

edit
 
Women in Red | July 2021, Volume 7, Issue 7, Numbers 184, 188, 202, 203, 204, 205


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

  Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:04, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Wilbert Hart

edit

Hey, a few months ago you listed Wilbert Hart at the Project Cleanup page. Nobody has done anything with it yet. What would you think about merging his page to that of his old band? This can be discussed in the APRIL section at Wikipedia:Cleanup. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:53, 3 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Upon a closer look at the articles, I think there should be a merge. If you'd like, discuss at Talk:The Delfonics#Merger proposal. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:46, 7 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Barry Rumack has been accepted

edit
 
Barry Rumack, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 16:15, 3 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Bkissin: Thank you for reviewing and accepting it. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 17:33, 3 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

UpGrad

edit

Re: Draft:upGrad - The subject is beyond me. Sorry, I am not able to help. I do very little work on companies/ business organisations, except in areas like steel and coal. I am somewhat familiar with these. Cheers. - Chandan Guha (talk) 00:09, 5 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the clarification. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 21:11, 5 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: UpGrad (July 19)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HighKing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
HighKing++ 20:36, 19 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

August Editathons at Women in Red

edit
 
Women in Red | August 2021, Volume 7, Issue 8, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 206, 207


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

  Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:23, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

September 2021 at Women in Red

edit
 
Women in Red | September 2021, Volume 7, Issue 9, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 207, 208


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

  Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:28, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Concern regarding Draft:7shifts

edit

  Hello, Bbarmadillo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:7shifts, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 30 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lasercare Clinics Harrogate (September 6)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 22:30, 6 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: GymNation (September 24)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Krishnavilasom Bhageerathan Pilla was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 22:20, 24 September 2021 (UTC)Reply