Bboy14

Speedy deletion of Cashel Dennehy School of Irish Dance

A tag has been placed on Cashel Dennehy School of Irish Dance requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JD554 (talk) 14:53, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Cashel Dennehy School of Irish Dance

I have deleted this page as not asserting notability. If you would like, I will move the deleted revisions to a subpage of yours, so that you may work on it further. If you would like to do that, make note on my talk page. Thanks. seresin | wasn't he just...? 03:46, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

I have restored the article to User:Bboy14/Cashel Dennehy School of Irish Dance. When you're done, feel free to poke me and I'll move it back into mainspace for you. seresin | wasn't he just...? 22:59, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

The genealogy of the school should take second place to documenting why CD is notable. The specifics of teams that have done well at Worlds and Oireachtas, that sort of thing. The article also needs to be wikified. E-mail me. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:50, 5 March 2008 (UTC) Yeah, that Orange Mike: Kelly's dad

Take a look at the edits I just did and follow my suggestions. Also: always post at the bottom of a talk page, bhoy, never at the top! --Orange Mike | Talk 01:23, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

We can't cite Cashel's website for most things, but that one's marginal enough that I'll try. --Orange Mike | Talk 01:43, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

There's nothing to back up that claim (or most of the rest of the stuff you've got in here) at the Cashel site! Lack of verifiability kills an article in a hurry. (Bad spelling, punctuation and grammar don't help, either.) --Orange Mike | Talk 01:46, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Surely somebody at Cashel has historical documents, records, clippings? We're Celts, we saved civilization when the Saxons were just a bunch of gangs beating up the Britons and Scots; we keep our records. --Orange Mike | Talk 01:53, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

It's still not ready for mainspace without proper references. Anything which is not verifiable from reliable sources is subject to deletion at any time. Read WP:CITE as well. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:44, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Since it's still in your userspace, it's not up for a speedy. I'm just giving you warning of what might happen if you were to post it in mainspace without addressing the verifiability and sourcing issues. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:29, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Signing your edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! If you do forget to sign a posting, and SignBot or similar software (or a human editor) puts your signature there, do not remove it. You are responsible for your edits. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:04, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 17:25, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:The Irish Tenors 2007.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:The Irish Tenors 2007.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:20, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:CDTagLongMulti.gif

Thanks for uploading File:CDTagLongMulti.gif. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:05, 6 April 2023 (UTC)