User talk:Bearian/ArchivesOctDec2014

Latest comment: 9 years ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic Happy Holidays!

October 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ruan Life Sciences may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ((Prod2|[[WP:SPAM|Possibly Spam]].}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:23, 1 October 2014 (UTC)Reply


  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sharktopus vs. Pteracuda may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • then bitten off by the two [[kraken]]-like [[Sailors' superstitions|sea monsters]]. [[Volleyball]]] players knock his severed head around as it continues [[Blood squirt|to squirt blood]].

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:48, 7 October 2014 (UTC)Reply


  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Brandon Marsh (triathlete) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • com/article_cebf2e23-1342-5710-a283-fb8b5d0baf6a.html one brief mention on one Google news article]]. Fails [[WP:42]].}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:46, 14 October 2014 (UTC)Reply


  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nicky Siano may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • of the Disc Jockey|authors=Bill Brewster, Frank Broughton, Frank Broughton|publisher=Grove Press|[page=188|year=2007|ISBN=9781555846114|accessdate=October 13, 2014}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:30, 14 October 2014 (UTC)Reply


  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tutankhamun may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • evidence in 2014 proved that Tutankhamun was the product of a brother-sister marriage.<ref>{[cite web|url=http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/10/21/1338067/-King-Tut-Revealed-Scientists-do-
  • Shocking Surprises |author=Gwennedd (pseudonym)|date=October 21, 2014|accessdate=October 21, 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2799418/king-tut-girlish-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:29, 21 October 2014 (UTC)Reply


  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to TrueMoneyGames may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {[Prod2|This page fails[[WP:V|verifiability]].}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:21, 27 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
Hello, Bearian. You have new messages at Jelly Bean MD's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Asian Volleyball players

edit

I have tagged so many the past few days! I also have quite a few up for AFD's also. I had some up as BLP prods also! But yeah it is crazy how many there are! Wgolf (talk) 16:53, 2 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

No problem. Thanks for cleaning up. Bearian (talk) 17:03, 2 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Deletion of Interbeing Facilitation System article

edit

You recently deleted an article that I authored. I understand why and get that since the concept of interbeing facilitation systems is quite new and hasn't received attention from "reliable sources" that it is perhaps too new for inclusion in Wikipedia. Is there any way for me to get the text that I wrote back? I'd at least like to have a copy of what I wrote so that I can put it back up after adding in the relevant references to reliable sources. Thanks.

Morphatic (talk) 18:36, 2 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Yes, sure, see User:Morphatic/Interbeing facilitation system. Bearian (talk) 19:17, 2 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 01 October 2014

edit
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dissolution of the Monasteries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greyfriars. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 8 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Scheiner Law Group

edit

Hi Bearian. Can you tell me what happened to the edit history of Scheiner Law Group? It seems to have disappeared prior to your Sept 15 edit, but I don't know why. --Dr. Fleischman (talk)

It was erased by another admin when the article was deleted. I can try to resurrect some of it from the dead. Bearian (talk) 19:04, 8 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
I restored the entire history, as you requested. Bearian (talk) 19:07, 8 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

New York state elections

edit

None of the election articles has any historical context info in the lede. These elections formerly happened every year, now every two years, independent of what was going on in the world. To date the election from some other event (for example, one year after the beginning of the big depression, twelve years after the construction of the Eiffel Tower, sixteen years after the death of President Washington) is in my opinion out of scope. Major events may be added in the Background (in older articles called "History") section, if they had a direct influence (explain why) in the election. Kraxler (talk) 13:31, 9 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 08 October 2014

edit

A question

edit

Hello dear Bearian. I have a question - did you see this (?) - http://www.addictinginfo.org/2014/09/06/its-official-president-obama-is-the-best-economic-president-in-modern-times/ . It is based on Forbes's report. Does this information worth to be written in the Barack Obama article or no? Thanks in advance for your opinion. M.Karelin (talk) 19:50, 12 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

No. First off, the source and the source it is based on are unreliable and opinion-laded. Secondly, the main Obama article is so long that nothing more can be added without splitting it further. Bearian (talk) 16:04, 13 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

AfD comment

edit

Your paraphrase of Winston Churchill's "riddle wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma" quote had me laughing out loud. Cheers. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 17:52, 13 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

You are welcome. I think it livened up a contentious discussion. Bearian (talk) 01:07, 14 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
@Bearian: Yes, and you managed not to get called out for being a lawyer-editor, even as you expressed essentially the same arguments and concerns I did. If I could go back in time five and a half years, I would almost certainly choose a different user name. Cheers, counselor. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 03:57, 14 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
Sigh. It's sort of the opposite of the situation of the Turkish astronomer who discovers The Little Prince's asteroid: "But he was in Turkish costume, and so nobody would believe what he said." Bearian (talk) 12:45, 14 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
That's an appropriate, if somewhat obscure metaphor. Or, if you're feeling biblical: "For Jesus himself testified, that a prophet hath no honour in his own country." John 4:44 (KJV) Cheers. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 13:31, 14 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Law on the language of the people of the Republic of Bashkortostan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Russian and Bashkir. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 15 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 15 October 2014

edit

Saiman Miah

edit

Dear Bearian, I invite you to express your opinion about the article for deletion. --Rossi101 (talk) 18:55, 20 October 2014 (UTC)Rossi101Reply

Merged article

edit

Could you let me know how to access my original page about Alconbury Weald so that I can merge the material into the RAF Alconbury page please? Thanks. Grumpykoala1 (talk) 14:00, 21 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! Grumpykoala1 (talk) 15:52, 21 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion/Sherif Amer

edit

Hi, I noticed that you deleted Sherif Amer. Did you mean to also close the AfD for it? Thanks.Natg 19 (talk) 17:48, 23 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Yes, sorry! Bearian (talk) 20:38, 23 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

please tweak

edit

Hi, thanks for your input on the AFD of the decarbonize europe's economy article here. However, you added commentary above the relisting. To assist the closing admin, please consider relocating your article at the end of the comments (like everyone else does). I don't see any particular reason relocation would alter your meaning, do you? NewsAndEventsGuy (talk)

Yes, I hope you weren't insulted! Bearian (talk) 20:39, 23 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
Certainly not! In fact, I can't imagine why that was a worry but no matter. All is well. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 23:00, 23 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 22 October 2014

edit

Halloween cheer!

edit
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jeffrey H. Friedman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ADA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 28 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 29 October 2014

edit
 
This lousy T-shirt has given you some caramel and a candy apple! Caramel and candy-coated apples are fun Halloween treats, and promote WikiLove on Halloween. Hopefully these have made your Halloween (and the proceeding days) much sweeter. Happy Halloween!

'"On Psych, A USA Network TV series Episode 8, The Tao of Gus, Season 6, Shawn refers to pumpkins as "Halloween Apples" because he thinks all round fruits are a type of apple.


If Trick-or-treaters come your way, add {{subst:Halloween apples}} to their talkpage with a spoooooky message!

 

Nomination of George Estrada for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article George Estrada is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Estrada until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 19:06, 1 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for citing Wikipedia:Coatrack

edit

Hello Bearian! I'm quite new at Wikipedia and I'm still learning the basics. I've read your mention of Wikipedia:Coatrack at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pipeline marketing and I just wanted to thank you for making me discover the guidelines dedicated to this topic. They are exactly was I was searching for! By the way, if you want to read about another excellent and quite clever example of (what I think is) WP:COAT, have a look at here. Cheers! LowLevel73(talk) 23:20, 3 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi!

edit

As you evince an interest in ancient bards of debatable notability, have a look here. Yours, Quis separabit? 18:37, 5 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Original Barnstar
your prod message on Adam Hughes (poet) made me laugh :)
Avono♂ (talk) 20:18, 5 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
You're welcome. Glad to make your day! Bearian (talk) 20:48, 5 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Bobby Cummines PROD?

edit

[1] Dude - a former notorious gangster with an OBE and a FRSA might not be notable? Really? --GRuban (talk) 15:03, 6 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

GRuban - I didn't say he was not notable; I just stated that it was disputed, hence I changed the speedy deletion tag to a proposed deletion, giving the creators seven more days to fix any issues. Bearian (talk) 17:29, 6 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
OK. Accepted. No trout for you. :-) --GRuban (talk) 18:48, 6 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brighton Women's Centre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Labour Party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:14, 6 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 05 November 2014

edit

Hi Bearian. I was confused by your remark "we are Wikipedia, not USApedia". What was this in reference to? Becky Sayles (talk) 04:15, 7 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Becky Sayles, a speech by a United States politician seems to get its own article, but one by a leader elsewhere in the world tends to get deleted. There are too many articles that focus on the USA rather than the rest of the world. I am OK with the redirect/merger. Bearian (talk) 17:30, 8 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, Bearian. You have new messages at Ethically Yours's talk page.
Message added 07:04, 8 November 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

EthicallyYours! 07:04, 8 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, Bearian. You have new messages at Jersey92's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Signpost: 12 November 2014

edit

Thursday December 4: NYC Wiki-Salon and Skill Share

edit
Thursday December 4: NYC Wiki-Salon and Skill Share
 

You are invited to join the the Wikimedia NYC community for our upcoming wiki-salon and knowledge-sharing workshop in Manhattan's Greenwich Village.

6:30pm–8pm at Babycastles, 137 West 14th Street

Afterwards at 8pm, we'll walk to a social wiki-dinner together at a neighborhood restaurant (to be decided).

We hope to see you there!--Pharos (talk) 07:10, 27 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by removing your name from this list.)

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kannerimukku, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Badaga. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 27 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Nevada

edit

Hello, Bearian,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether it should be deleted. Your comments are welcome.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CE9A:860:DD6B:693A:ACF:B874 (talk) 18:46, 27 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 26 November 2014

edit

PROD vs Redirect

edit

I stumbled on this thread by pure coincidence and I saw you didn't really get a direct reply. DePRODing to create a redirect is perfectly legitimate. I do it all the time if it's appropriate. Our actual deletion policy leans towards being inclusive and recommends redirecting rather than outright deletion. If you create such a redirect however, do remember to include the :R from...' template on the redirect page so that it loads the correct message and populates the related cat. For example, a school redirect would have this template {{R from school}} which creates a message for anyone who sees the redirect rather than the target page. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:38, 29 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Lazurus999

edit

I suspect (well, based on what he said on my talk page, I know for sure) that User:Lazurus999, whom you just blocked, is a sockpuppet of User:Wikiblanks. Wikiblanks was blocked yesterday for edit warring, then blocked again about 2 hours later for continuing the edit war with the sockpuppet User:Childprotect1 (report). Is it worth filing another sockpuppet report for Lazarus999 and Wikiblanks? Given the comments Wikiblanks made on his own talk page [2] [3] shortly after you blocked Lazurus999, I think it's unlikely Wikiblanks won't send me more legal threats/insults or make more sockpuppets. Thanks, Tiller54 (talk) 22:36, 2 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Meh. To mix metaphors, Tiller54, let sleeping trolls starve under the bridge. Bearian (talk) 13:37, 8 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 03 December 2014

edit

Woodson museum

edit

Thanks for explaining your rationale carefully; I've prodded a lot of this user's edited-too-much-for-G5 stubs, basically just to get rid of ones that didn't appear to have a shred of notability, regardless of their topic. I'm much more in favor of redirecting than deleting, but when possible: as I explained when nominating the article for deletion just now, I don't see a good target. Nyttend (talk) 21:44, 9 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Malay characteristic

edit

Weyh, ckp baik2 skit boleh x? Ko ni ader period ker? Tetiba nk carik pasal, ko jgn cabar aq, kang aq btol2 meletup kang, nyesal ko... Razirchen (talk) 11:03, 10 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

FWIW, I indef-blocked this user. Bearian (talk) 14:09, 11 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
You want to know how I managed to evade your blocking? Let me reason with you, do you like it if your father doing something on the internet, your father gets blocked unjustly and indefinitely without mercy and second chance? Do you like it if your mother doing something on the internet, your mother gets blocked unjustly and indefinitely? Do you like it if you sons or daughter get blocked unjustly and indefinitely just because of petty issues? If I am an admin and you are ordinary user, do you like it if I blocked you unjustly and indefinitely without a chance to change just because of petty issues? Just be in my shoes and see what happen if I do the same thing as you do towards me... Also, I am just creating an article to contribute to the wikipedia, and, all of a sudden you sent me a message of warning of vandalism. How can a wikipedian user who create a probable reasonable article doing a vandalism and even being blocked unjustly and indefinitely just because to advice you? Think about it... Anonsinim (talk) 13:04, 17 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Frozen

edit

I'm contacting you because you were the last admin to edit the protection settings on Frozen (2013 film). Recently (last month or so) the page has suffered consistent vandalism and incompetent edits while only one IP edit has been accepted. Would another period of semi-protection be appropriate, so interest and so unconstructive edits might begin to wear off? BethNaught (talk) 22:07, 10 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bearian (talk) 22:10, 10 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Catholicism in Argentina

edit
Where do you see 3 reverts in less than 24 hours ???
I've added information on the 19 November [4]
It was deleted on the 7 December [5]
I restored it on the 8 December [6]
It was deleted on the 8 December [7]
End of the strory.
You're threating me in an aggressive manner on the 11 December... [8]
It is sad that Wikipedia admins don't know how to count up to three, as I only revert it once. Blaue Max (talk) 18:13, 11 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
I saw those two reverts, to which you have admitted. I was warning you from doing it three times. I only warned you that you could face sanctions if you did it a third time. I noted, as well, that you've been called out before about your past edit warring. I didn't want to template you, but the next time, I'll be forced to do so, since you don't seem to comprehend subtle hints. Bearian (talk) 20:18, 15 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
Pardon my interjection/interruption. While the WP:3RR provides a bright line, WP:Edit warring is more comprehensive and extends beyond 24 hours. I am passing no judgments here, but think that 'all the guns should be out on the table.' Happy editing to you both. 7&6=thirteen () 20:27, 15 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
I did just one revert !!! [9] Where do you see that I admit two reverts ??? The edit of the 19 November [10] was new information brought by me, not a revert... You should think and comprehend a situation before acting unsubtly. I guess waiting for apologies is pointless... "Constant experience shows us that every man invested with power is apt to abuse it" - Montesquieu. 17:19, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
And the fact that my talkpage has been vandalized with WP:3RR [[11]] by a sockpuppet named User:Historian Student is not an argument.Blaue Max (talk) 17:24, 17 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
Well then, you've had your chance to argue, and in the wrong venue. "A guilty man flees when none pursue." Bearian (talk) 17:37, 17 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 10 December 2014

edit

Happy birthday!

edit
  Hey, Bearian. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day!
George Edward CTalkContributions 07:35, 14 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
 
Thank you, kindly. Bearian (talk) 13:55, 23 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Seasonal Greets!

edit
  Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015 !!!

Hello Bearian, May you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New year 2015.
Happy editing,
NorthAmerica1000 14:40, 18 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Thank you, kindly. Bearian (talk) 13:54, 23 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 17 December 2014

edit
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited A Little Respect, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neil Francis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 19 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Merry Merry

edit

To you and yours

 

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 14:16, 22 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, kindly. Bearian (talk) 13:54, 23 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 24 December 2014

edit

Happy Holidays!

edit
  Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015!!!

Hello Bearian, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2015.
Happy editing,
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:01, 25 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} to all registered users whom have commented on his talk page. To prevent receiving future messages, please follow the opt-out instructions on User:Technical 13/Holiday list