Beastly21
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. TNXMan 23:50, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
Beastly21 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I admit that IamBeastly20 was me, but I do not think I have done anything since that account was blocked worthy of an indefinate block. I know I should have said that IamBeastly20 was me. I do not believe I have been so disruptive that I deserve to be blocked, and I know that when I am being blocked, Tnxman307, that my talk page is not to be deleted. REDIRECT User:Beastly21/Signature 01:35, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You appear not to understand the reason for your block- when you were blocked as IamBeastly20, you lost the privilege of editing Wikipedia. You are not allowed to avoid that block by creating a new account. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 01:40, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I deleted your userpage per policy, and blanked all but the block notice on the talk page. The completely unacceptable activity of the previous account [1], coupled with the persistently prurient focus of this account renders all assumption of good faith for this account pointless. Acroterion (talk) 01:51, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- Then why wasn't I blocked along time ago? I haven't been a consistent vandal since my first block. {{SUBST:User:Beastly20/Signature}} 02:09, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- We do not need users who sometimes make good edits and sometimes vandalize. That you think vandalism is sometimes okay means that you can't be trusted with a Wikipedia account. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:10, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- I don't think it is okay. I sometimes like to read Page Histories and read the vandalism edits, though. I'm sorry if I made it sound like I think vandalism is okay. Beastly21 03:13, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- The edit history of the first account indicates that you aren't well suited for editing here. You've been on the edge of blocking for some time now with this account - several editors have expressed concern here. The nature of the edits from September remove any doubt. Acroterion (talk) 02:54, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- Also noting the personal attack that he did that I ended up reverting... I'll find the diff. --Addihockey10e-mail 02:56, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- We do not need users who sometimes make good edits and sometimes vandalize. That you think vandalism is sometimes okay means that you can't be trusted with a Wikipedia account. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:10, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- Then why wasn't I blocked along time ago? I haven't been a consistent vandal since my first block. {{SUBST:User:Beastly20/Signature}} 02:09, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- [2] --Addihockey10e-mail 02:59, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- May I be allowed to create another account and edit constructively with the new account? I have said this before, but my dad has denied access to much of the Internet. Saying that, I can't go to a social networking site and talk to my friends or go to a game site and play games, but I can edit Wikipedia. Because of that, I can't do any research other than from Wikipedia articles, so I can't significantly improve articles. Therefore, I express myself on here more than I probably would if I had access to the rest of the Internet, probably wouldn't even have an account in the first place. I edit Wikipedia mostly for fun, not really for anything else, because this is the only real site I have access to. I am sorry for all the vandalism I have committed and regret doing anything worthy of warranting a block. Beastly21 03:13, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- Based on your previous account and the diff noted above, you have no business being here on Wikipedia. Your dad is probably correct to limit your access to the Internet; you appear to have some growing up to do, starting with your attitude towards others. The Internet is possibly the worst possible place to try to learn respect and tolerance for others. Wikipedia isn't a substitute for a social networking site; if you're not here to improve the encyclopedia, there isn't much else for you to do, ignoring, for the moment, your unacceptable conduct. Acroterion (talk) 04:04, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- Let me say it again: I cannot do research and make significant edits due to my restrictions put on the whole family because of my little brother. And believe me, I would. I would also probably have a less offensive user page and signature. Therefore, when I come across a grammar or spelling error, which happens rarely because I have a slow computer so other people beat me to the punch, I fix it to the best of my abilities. I also had an account on the Call of Duty Wiki, here, where if you view one discussion page or blog there, you will realize that there are admins that behave worse than I did here. And correct me if I'm wrong, but the last personal attack I made, which I regret making in the first place, was in September. I regret any wrongdoing I have committed here. I would like a second chance to edit here and would have liked a warning telling me to stop doing whatever I was doing wrong before being blocked, in my opinion, out of the blue. I will change my signature to say only my username and try not to put anything too offensive on my userpage if you unblock me. I know that one of you will say that I have lost my privalege of editing Wikipedia, but this is my last try. Beastly21 22:56, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- I stand corrected, the attack was in October, but I still sincerely regret making any and all personal attacks here and on the Call of Duty Wiki, where I have made one or two. Beastly21 23:37, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- Based on your previous account and the diff noted above, you have no business being here on Wikipedia. Your dad is probably correct to limit your access to the Internet; you appear to have some growing up to do, starting with your attitude towards others. The Internet is possibly the worst possible place to try to learn respect and tolerance for others. Wikipedia isn't a substitute for a social networking site; if you're not here to improve the encyclopedia, there isn't much else for you to do, ignoring, for the moment, your unacceptable conduct. Acroterion (talk) 04:04, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- May I be allowed to create another account and edit constructively with the new account? I have said this before, but my dad has denied access to much of the Internet. Saying that, I can't go to a social networking site and talk to my friends or go to a game site and play games, but I can edit Wikipedia. Because of that, I can't do any research other than from Wikipedia articles, so I can't significantly improve articles. Therefore, I express myself on here more than I probably would if I had access to the rest of the Internet, probably wouldn't even have an account in the first place. I edit Wikipedia mostly for fun, not really for anything else, because this is the only real site I have access to. I am sorry for all the vandalism I have committed and regret doing anything worthy of warranting a block. Beastly21 03:13, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- [2] --Addihockey10e-mail 02:59, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
editHello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.
For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:28, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
File:Van halen Stripes.png listed for deletion
editA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Van halen Stripes.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:26, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Name of page, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 18:07, 9 August 2013 (UTC)