Welcome =

edit

Welcome!

Hello, Beenrunman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! œ 19:34, 31 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Reference Desk

edit

You're very welcome. I did a search on the reference desks for the question I answered that you posted but couldn't find it. Which question was it? schyler (talk) 00:09, 3 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

P.S. please reply on my talk page :)

November 2010

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Thomas Hoegh, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. some jerk on the Internet (talk) 21:39, 17 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Some jerk on the Internet. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. some jerk on the Internet (talk) 21:41, 17 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User:Some jerk on the Internet. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 21:42, 17 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 21:43, 17 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Beenrunman (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I would like to be unblocked because I feel bad for my abusive editing and I do have some good edits besides what I did that day I vandalized many articles. I do have one question though, how am I sockpupeter?Beenrunman (talk) 18:30, 2 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Seriously? We're not stupid: [1] [2]. I see no reason to unblock you if you can't be straight with us. Hersfold (t/a/c) 18:57, 2 December 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Beenrunman (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I really can do better, is there some kind of test or something where I can edit a page and depending on how I treat that maybe giving back more Wikipedia privlages. Beenrunman (talk) 19:35, 2 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Accept reason:

I have doubts that you are mature enough to be editing Wikipedia, but I will give you a second chance. If, as I think is likely, we see further signs of immaturity, this account will be reblocked without any further discussion and I will shut off talk page access for one year, to give you time to grow up a bit. You have a chance, please use it well! Looie496 (talk) 19:48, 2 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

I have a question for you Looie so if you can please get back to me ASAP

Eh? Looie496 (talk) 20:31, 2 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Never mind I had someone else help me but thanks Beenrunman (talk) 20:33, 2 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Joshua Morrison

edit
 

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 5 albert square (talk) 18:16, 14 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. We thought you had promised you'd be a constructive editor. The creation of an attack page on 14 December proves otherwise. Alexf(talk) 18:24, 14 December 2010 (UTC)Reply