Belteshazzar293
Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
edit
|
Deo Volente
editAre you one of Jehovah's Witnesses? I see your contribution. Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 08:23, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
HELP
editCan you HELP me? Please see this. Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 07:31, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. Deo Volente. Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 07:31, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Jehovah's Witnesses project
editI have started a discussion regarding the content wikipedia has regarding the Jehovah's Witnesses at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Jehovah's Witnesses#Comments regarding template and project. Seeing that you are listed as a member of that project, I would appreciate any responses to the material there you would like to make. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 14:34, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Hardcore Station
editNow that is the fastest response I have seen to anything I've done!! Thanks - I'm still fairly new to this, and forgot there isn't an automatic build if there's less than 4 items - missed it on the proofing as well (because I had one eye on the Olympic speed skating) - something learned there. Thanks Archiveangel (talk) 02:14, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello Belteshazzar293. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Chitrada, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article about a place, therefore not eligible for A7. Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 03:04, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
I don't know why you accused me of copyright violation, I don't do such things. I know copyright detection computer programmes exist and I'm happy for Wikipedia to use those programmes to prove I didn't copy anyone else's work. The article is also at Liberapedia where I copied it a day after I wrote it here, see history. I wrote it myself here yesterday. I was trying to help suicidal people and I don't feel I deserve these fantasy accusations for that. Proxima Centauri (talk) 19:08, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Survey for new page patrollers
edit
New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Belteshazzar293! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:35, 25 October 2011 (UTC).
Ichthus: January 2012
editICHTHUS |
January 2012 |
In this issue...
For submissions and subscriptions contact the Newsroom
New deal for page patrollers
editHi Belteshazzar293,
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.
Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)