Benny191, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Benny191! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Foot fetishism, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Either provide reliable sources for this or stop adding it. Meters (talk) 03:24, 14 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Foot fetishism. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The source does not confirm that this is a case of crush fetishism. Either discuss this on the talk page or leave it out. By adding this three times now you are edit warring. See WP:EW. Meters (talk) 17:30, 14 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Crush fetish. Same text and same video as in Foot fetishism, and the same problem. It's a video of someone crushing bugs, but there is no reliable source to say that this is crush fetishism. Meters (talk) 17:33, 14 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors, which you did not do on User talk:Meters. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. bonadea contributions talk 19:46, 14 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

I assume no good faith in "Meters". Please look at his comment page, several unhappy customers complaining about him.

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Acroterion (talk) 20:03, 14 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
When your block ends, please stay off my talk page. After your personal attack and threat to sock I have no interest in discussing anything with you. Meters (talk) 21:19, 14 July 2018 (UTC).Reply

September 2018

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Crush fetish, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 16:31, 13 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kyle Morrelli

edit
 

The article Kyle Morrelli has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Escape Orbit (Talk) 17:19, 16 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kyle Morrelli

edit
 

The article Kyle Morrelli has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 19:55, 16 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Kyle Morrelli

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kyle Morrelli requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 19:56, 16 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

September 2018

edit
 

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Kyle Morrelli. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with blocks or other sanctions. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. CataracticPlanets (talk) 20:00, 16 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  5 albert square (talk) 21:10, 16 September 2018 (UTC)Reply