User talk:Bensin/Archives/2022

Category:Beauty pageant films has been nominated for renaming

Category:Beauty pageant films has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 17:05, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification. --Bensin (talk) 16:22, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Sunset Range for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sunset Range is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunset Range until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:18, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification. --Bensin (talk) 18:50, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aron Flam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Traditionalism.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Police Station

The article Police Station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced stub since forever

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:41, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification. I updated the article. --Bensin (talk) 13:28, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Police Station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Police Station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Police Station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:14, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

OK. I updated the article further. --Bensin (talk) 17:01, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Wall (1962 film)

The article The Wall (1962 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 22:26, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

OK. I have updated the article and added a source. --Bensin (talk) 17:08, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Boarding House Blues

The article Boarding House Blues has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails the requirements of WP:NFILM - IMDb is not an acceptable or reliable source.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 11:54, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

OK. --Bensin (talk) 11:24, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Boarding House Blues for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Boarding House Blues is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boarding House Blues until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dan arndt (talk) 23:54, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification. I have updated the article and some related articles. --Bensin (talk) 11:25, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dusty Fletcher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Killer Diller.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

OK. Now fixed. --Bensin (talk) 09:59, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ashley's Worlds, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pedigree and Lucky charm.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

OK. Now fixed. --Bensin (talk) 16:49, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Queen of Cactus Cove for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Queen of Cactus Cove, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queen of Cactus Cove until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification. --Bensin (talk) 15:10, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Standard ArbCom sanctions notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Newimpartial (talk) 18:41, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

For future reference, this was posted here after I made a split proposal[1][2], and followed up on the talk page[3][4][5]. --Bensin (talk) 15:31, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Adventures of Pinocchio (1911 film) has been accepted

The Adventures of Pinocchio (1911 film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 21:02, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! --Bensin (talk) 21:03, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Evan Jones (actor)

The article Evan Jones (actor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:NACTOR no indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TryKid ^{[dubious – discuss]} 09:01, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

OK! --Bensin (talk) 18:49, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Evan Jones (actor) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Evan Jones (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evan Jones (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TryKid ^{[dubious – discuss]} 14:32, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

OK. --Bensin (talk) 21:56, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Genetix

The article Genetix has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not seem to be a notable piece of software.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

OK. The article has now been expaded and I added a source. --Bensin (talk) 19:36, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Genetix for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Genetix is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genetix until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Natg 19 (talk) 04:52, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

OK. --Bensin (talk) 17:30, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)