Benzygs940

Re: Bot Shutdown

Thanks for your message. Can you explain further why the bot should be shutdown? - Jarry1250 ^{[Weasel? Discuss.]} 09:04, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Benzygs940. You have new messages at Gfoley4's talk page.
Message added 01:46, 29 July 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—GFOLEY FOUR!— 01:46, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:00, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Trouting

Trouting is only supposed to be used for reminders of things like site policies, not to grieve about a user's action within policy like blocking an IP address.Jasper Deng (talk) 00:30, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

August 2011

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Goldblooded, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You really need to stop these nonsense actions, like trouting Gfoley4. You will be blocked the next time you do this. Jasper Deng (talk) 00:40, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:54, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

unblock me please.i begging you.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Benzygs940 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

for being very sorry and i dont wanna do it again.Benzygs940 (talk) 01:33, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

• Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
• Read our guide to improving articles
• Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
• If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:

1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
    • do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
    • do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
    • do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
    • do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), place at the end of the prose you copied this template {{reflist-talk}} and then save.

• Now, edit that content to propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
• When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
  • If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:56, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Little word of advice

Firstly , How on earth did you find my page? I dont even know you! Secondly, to be honest i dont think you should be unbanned since your account is used purely to annoy people , ive seen your edits and theres no clear explanation to what you were doing. On some of the unconstructive edits You speak of something about a school ban? Perhaps people from your school kept vanadalising on here and got banned, its commonplace.

But there was no need or point to create an account on here to purely rant about it and annoy/troll others and clearly you have no intention of actually improving wikipedia or helping out other users. Goldblooded (talk) 02:09, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Goldblooded is right, except that banning is a very serious thing that's different from blocking. Blocking is a mere technical restriction, but a ban is formal, and is often enforced by blocks. Goldblooded, I think Benzygs940 had looked at my contribs based on the fact that he impersonated me with those fake warnings. As for you, Benzygs940, you're clearly not here to build an encyclopedia, so I suggest the reviewing admin decline the unblock request and removal talk page access.Jasper Deng (talk) 03:32, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

im want you to unblock this account

this account is not used by the school.it used by home.im suggest you all to accept my child account due to his punishmentand he said:he sorry for what he done.

child help

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Benzygs940 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

child punishment Benzygs940 (talk) 23:23, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

See below. –MuZemike 23:48, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ok

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Benzygs940 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

202.45.119.19 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Vandalism-only account

• Blocking administrator: Amatulic (talk • blocks)

---

Decline reason: Is it bloody obvious that the post two sections above was written by you (as opposed to a literate adult), and that you have abused this IP address as well as others. I suggest you try again in several years after you have matured a little more and can act like a more responsible person; Wikipedia is not a toy. –MuZemike 23:48, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

that it

im not some dummy.im am a grown up.im not playing with wikipedia.unblock me right now or i get the wikipedia police to do it for me.

i wanna make a page

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Benzygs940 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

want to create a page now Benzygs940 (talk) 01:30, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Tough. And there is no Wikipedia police Jac16888 ^Talk 01:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

please

i wanna....use.......the wikipedia chat.....to talk to the....user

you know what.i dont care,i make a new one at home.you never get me.

Some more advice.

I believe myself and Jasper have made ourselves clear;

What do you expect to get from people when you vandalise their pages and troll them? What article are you trying to create anyway? Had you of acted decently and with a bit of chivarly and WP:FAITH then you wouldnt of been banned. Also , if you really are an adult- how come you said something about child punishment? Besides the way you talk and act to other admins and users is childish; Perhaps give a clear explanation of what you intend to do if you were unbanned not just whiny begging crap and then the admins may or may not reconsider. Goldblooded (talk) 23:48, 8 August 2011 (UTC)