User talk:Bettydaisies/Archives/2022

Template:Did you know nominations/Red dress of Julia Roberts

Bettydaisies, you never did finish the final step in the DYK nomination process of this article. Did you want to pursue the nomination? If so, I'm happy to do the final step for you; if you don't, we can arrange for the nomination to be deleted, though I think that would be a shame. Please let me know one way or the other. Thank you for your interest in DYK. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:54, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Bettydaisies, if I don't hear from you by the end of 2021, I will assume that you are not interested in pursuing your DYK nomination of Red dress of Julia Roberts, and arrange for it to be closed as abandoned. If you haven't edited on Wikipedia between now and then, though, I will wait until you have edited so I know that you've seen this message, before I take any action. Best wishes for a Happy New Year. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:41, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Bettydaisies, I realize in my last post I said that I would wait until you have edited, but since that can stretch on indefinitely, I'm putting a limit on it, since you will have seen my original post above when you made your most recent edits on 16 December 2021. I will wait at least until the end of the day on 10 January 2022, but after that the nomination may be closed at any time. Best of luck, and Happy New Year. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:46, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Hey, I was absent for a while, and I'd just like to apologize for the inconvenience caused! Thank you so much for your understanding and interest in helping. Best wishes.--Bettydaisies (talk) 01:32, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Welcome back! No problem at all: I'm sorry the nomination didn't work out. Maybe next time! BlueMoonset (talk) 04:13, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Fashion of Meghan, Duchess of Sussex

Hello, Bettydaisies. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fashion of Meghan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:41, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fashion of Diana, Princess of Wales has been accepted

Fashion of Diana, Princess of Wales, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

>>> Wgullyn.talk(); 00:32, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Just a note -- you have several thousand edits now, so you're free to move articles to mainspace yourself if you want. Cheers! >>> Wgullyn.talk(); 00:33, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Awesome! I wasn't sure about the draft -> mainspace process, thank you for letting me know :)--Bettydaisies (talk) 00:40, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Miss Audrey

Are you sure about the final form of all those deletes from the Hepburn page dealing with Givenchy in preference to your new fashion page about her. Is there sufficient emphasis on her main bio page about Givenchy to do their collaboration justice? Should the language on her main bio page be adjusted for the comments on Givenchy? (Here are some added images about their collaboration over the years [1]). ErnestKrause (talk) 18:53, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

There's about a paragraph and a half dedicated to their work together. What do you suggested be added back to underline it?--Bettydaisies (talk) 20:33, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

The concern is the low page daily page counts for the new page you have added. Readers are not seeing the parts you deleted from that section in the main article when you split your new page for fashion. Possibly you could add some 'see also' links on the movie pages which your have mentioned in your article, or make some connections by piping links from the movie pages in which she appeared. This is another fashion article or two about Hepburn which you may or may not have seen at Black Givenchy dress of Audrey Hepburn and White floral Givenchy dress of Audrey Hepburn. ErnestKrause (talk) 00:35, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Vogue Australia 2020.jpg

The file File:Vogue Australia 2020.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

replaced by File:Vogue Australia December 2019 60th anniversary.png as lead image...

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• File:British Vogue June 2020.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Vogue Australia 2020.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Vogue Australia 2020.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Monegasque Red Cross Logo.jpg

The file File:Monegasque Red Cross Logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned, redundant to File:Monaco Red Cross logo.svg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HouseBlaster^talk 19:09, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Elle Magazine 2020.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Elle Magazine 2020.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Sunrise in Heaven redirect

Hello Bettydaisies! I am a new contributor who expanded on an article for actress Caylee Cowan but it was made a redirect. You left a message on my talk page that read " Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.--Bettydaisies (talk) 18:59, 11 February 2022 (UTC)"

I took the time to familiarize myself with policies and guidelines I did not intend to make test edits but to publish a page that I worked on. The subject of the new article, Caylee Cowan, is an actress in the movie sunrise in heaven which the page is being redirected to. The subject of the article ( Caylee Cowan ) is a person and not a film. The redirect might cause confusion because the subject is in several movies and could plausibly be expanded into an article, and the target article ( Sunrise in Heaven ) contains virtually no information on the subject. the subject, Caylee Cowan, is in serval movies such as willy's wonderland and frank and Penelope which has just been released in theaters. I cited properly and published the page meeting all requirements to make the page Caylee Cowan but it was then reverted to a redirect. I did not intend to bypass by using alternative capitalization. My intention was to add more citations to websites where the subject is mentioned because the subject is cited in news articles. All citations are from notable and verifiable sources and so I do not understand why it has been reverted. Other wiki pages have been made for actors who are of similar notability which the subject Caylee Cowan has worked with such as Travis Burns (actor), Emily Tosta, Nicolas Cage, Corbin Bernsen, Dee Wallace, Donna D'Errico, Kevin Dillon, Sean Patrick Flanery, ,David Sheftell, Charley Koontz, William Shockley (actor), Erin Bethea, Jenn Gotzon, Charlotte D'Alessio Sonya Eddy. I would like to request your help as I think that this article has substantial grounds for creation. Thank you very much! Articleeditscontributor (talk) 05:00, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Cinderella's ball gown

Hello, Bettydaisies. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cinderella's ball gown, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:06, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Princess Grace Foundation-USA Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Princess Grace Foundation-USA Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Yeeno (talk) 03:25, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)