Your submission at Articles for creation: John Bell (EU Bioeconomy leader) (July 18)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MicrobiologyMarcus were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 14:51, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Bioecontable! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 14:51, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

July 2024

edit
 

Hello Bioecontable. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Bioecontable. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Bioecontable|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 14:51, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

@MicrobiologyMarcus they've confirmed via IRC they have no paid connection to this person. Qcne (talk) 08:31, 23 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi! I am a self-employed person that I like following the actions that the European Commission is doing and this article is about Directorate B at Reserach and Innovation, which is doind a lot for climate change, what I consider a commun interest. All the information is public, you can check it on John Bell' Linkedin, the different websites of the European Commission and the different public publications. I am not receiving any money for this and I do not have any promotional interests. Bioecontable (talk) 11:28, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your username

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw that you edited or created Draft:John Bell (EU Bioeconomy leader), and I noticed that your username, "Bioecontable", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually (not your role), such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. Alternatively, you can just create a new account and use that for editing. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 14:52, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi! My username is not a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Can I keep it? Bioecontable (talk) 11:20, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

July 2024

edit

  Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Directorate "Healthy Planet", European Commission, from its old location at User:Bioecontable/sandbox2. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. - RichT|C|E-Mail 12:24, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Bell (EU Bioeconomy leader) (August 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CSMention269 were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(🗨️✉️📔) 17:03, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply