BlackBreath

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or sock puppetry.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

Stephen Granger

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Stephen Granger, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://arrowhead-authentication.com/About%20Dr%20Granger.htm.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:39, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Stephen Granger

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Stephen Granger requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://arrowhead-authentication.com/About%20Dr%20Granger.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. schetm (talk) 18:01, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Copyright, references and notability

Wikipedia cannot accept copyright material, not even in sandboxes or draft pages, not even temporarily. Please read Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources.

Assertion of permission to use text is not enough; we have to be certain that the person giving a release has the authority to do so, and that the actual copyright holder understands and agrees to Wikipedia's CC-BY-SA license terms, which allow any reader to copy, modify and re-use material for any purpose including commercial. For those reasons, a formal copyright release is required, as described at WP:Donating copyrighted materials.

However, it is unlikely that simply copying the subject's website will make an acceptable encyclopedia article. You said on the talk page that you were posting the article at Dr Granger's request, but Wikipedia is not a place for people to write about themselves, for reasons explained at Wikipedia:Autobiography. An article should be based more on what other people say about the subject than on what he says about himself, and Wikipedia's inclusion criterion, called Wikipedia:Notability, looks for references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." See also Wikipedia:Notability (people) and Wikipedia:Notability (academics).

The best way for you to proceed would be to read WP:Your first article, collect independent references such as reviews of Dr Granger's work, and use the Wikipedia:Articles for creation process to guide you through preparing an article. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 20:56, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Reply to your message on my talk page

I'm afraid saying that you have "permission to use information on Wikipedia" is not enough. To make a copyright release, it is necessary to follow the steps described in WP:Donating copyrighted materials. The easiest way is for the owner of the site to place explicit permission on it, in the form of words given there; alternatively, permission can be given by email from an address associated with the source site.

It is important to use the form of words prescribed there. Permission restricted to "use on Wikipedia" is not enough, because Wikipedia is published under the CC-BY-SA license which allows any reader to copy, modify, and use for any purpose including commercial, and we need to be assured that the actual copyright owner understands and agrees to that.

That content would not by itself be acceptable as an article. Wikipedia has an inclusion criterion called Wikipedia:Notability which looks for references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." See also WP:Notability (summary) and WP:Notability (people). Since Granger is "considered one of the foremost experts on Native American Artifacts and Cultures" references showing that should be available, such as independent reviews of his books or other comments on his work in academic journals, and the article will need to cite them, both to show notability and because of the Wikipedia:Verifiability policy, summarised as: "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source".

I am sorry if the copyright requirements seem bureaucratic, but copyright is an important issue because, since Wikipedia publishes under a free license, publishing copyright material could cause serious legal problems if readers copy and use it. If copyright is sorted out, I will restore the article into a draft space where you can work on it.

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 22:55, 24 February 2016 (UTC)