Welcome!

edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 18:09, 13 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Please be careful

edit

You have made a lot of poor contributions that have had to be reverted and you vaguely remind me of someone else who got into trouble for pushing their unsourced opinion etc into articles about Nepali castes, Madhesi and Chhetri people etc. You do not want to end up in the same position as them, ie: either banned from contributing to certain topics or blocked completely. Please note the information below. - Sitush (talk) 08:26, 14 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia: General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

None of my edits had anything lacking or shortage of references. The references I provided thereby were from independent journals and unless I start vandalizing Wikipedia without reliable sources, you have no right to put any sanctions. The poorly sourced articles can be further expanded with discussions on common grounds and more reliables sources but not with the legitimate power you inherit from Wikipedia which in no case is for blocking users, reverting edits and banning topics haphazardly protecting your some hidden self-interest. Even I am American of-of South Asian origin with residence here in Indo-Nepal border and I am seriously compatible with Wikipedia terms and conditions. Instead of warning me, I am expecting your advice, directions, and guidance on making Wikipedia a more reliable source of information for scholars and independent Internet users. I am waiting for your quick reply at your earliest convenience. Anyway, nice talking to you. See ya!

Prashant Jha of Nepal moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Prashant Jha of Nepal, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:14, 9 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prashant Jha of Nepal (October 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 03:03, 9 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Black Chapter! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 03:03, 9 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Poudar

edit
 

Hello, Black Chapter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Poudar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor 14:10, 12 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

March 2020

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Gotitbro (talk) 04:21, 17 March 2020 (UTC)Reply