BloodSkullzRock

Contentious topic

You have recently made edits related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them. This is a standard message to inform you that gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. ObserveOwl (chit-chat • my doings) 13:52, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

It is a page about the political party Party of Women of which I am a member and one of the candidates. I do not want my name to be associated with lies and slander TRAs such as Apricotjam who add sources which are biased and unreliable. We are not "anti-trans" we are simply anti males in female-only spaces/sports/etc. regardless of how they identify because they are male. BloodSkullzRock (talk) 13:59, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

If you are a close member of it, you might have a conflict of interest. ObserveOwl (chit-chat • my doings) 14:03, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

I know what my party stands for far better than biased TRAs who call immutable biological facts transphobic.

If someone edited a page about you and referred to you as a racist would you not revert it?

If they put that some people may consider us transphobic then I would accept that, but blanket labelling us based on their personal opinion is not acceptable and they have just as much of a conflict of interest. BloodSkullzRock (talk) 14:15, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ObserveOwl (chit-chat • my doings) 14:42, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Lavalizard101 (talk) 15:45, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 15:56, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BloodSkullzRock (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was removing content from a page that was attacking legally protected views, biased and discriminatory sources that cannot be considered reliable sources of information and was not helping to build an encyclopedia. As for my page none of its contents are bigoted they're facts. I can elaborate if you would like.

Decline reason:

You have no freedom of speech here, no legally protected views. See WP:FREESPEECH. Yamla (talk) 17:10, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BloodSkullzRock (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The block claimed I was being bigoted. Wikipedia states "A bigot is someone intolerant of others' differing ideas, races, genders, religions, politics, etc."[1] The block is being bigoted towards me as you are intolerant of my ideas, politics, and also of facts. Wikipedia also states that sources must be reliable so cannot be opinions from news sites [2]. As I mentioned before Pink News is not a reliable source due to its biased reporting, as well as disinformation and slander. As for my user page it was not attacking anyone it stated facts as I mentioned before. Simply denying my unblock request by fixating on one point (freedom of speech) and not addressing the rest is discriminatory and unprofessional.

Decline reason:

The block is because you are not here to build an encyclopedia. Cabayi (talk) 18:42, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.