Your submission at Articles for creation: Sovereign Bank Arena, New Jersey 2005 (June 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 03:42, 12 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Blue2020! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 03:42, 12 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

June 2019 Comment Reply

edit

In accordance with WP:NALBUM, an album requires its own notability, and that notability is not inherited and requires independent evidence. That an album is an officially released recording by a notable musician or ensemble is not by itself reason for a standalone article. Album articles with little more than a track listing may be more appropriately merged into the artist's main article or discography article, space permitting.

In order to establish notability the article needs to satisfy the general notability guidelines - which requires significant coveraqe in multiple independent secondary sources. As I indicated Bruce Springsteen's website is a primary source and therefore not acceptable. The Rolling Stone article doesn't even mention the album at all. If you are able to provide acceptable independent references specifically related to the actual album I'd be happy to review my position. Dan arndt (talk) 04:57, 13 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

June 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm ZimZalaBim. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kenny Loggins have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. ZimZalaBim talk 02:07, 24 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

July 2019

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sara Bareilles. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 03:16, 3 July 2019 (UTC) I AM NOT BEING DISRUPTIVE.Reply

Submitted Sara Bareilles Little Voice Tour info. Would REALLY like it approved.

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Gordon Lightfoot. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. David J Johnson (talk) 10:03, 8 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit

Graham87 02:41, 29 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Blue2020 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have done absolutely NOTHING abusive. I did NOT create this account to have it blocked from editing. I JUST, WITHIN THE LAST FEW MONTHS CREATED THIS ACCOUNT. GIVE ME ANOTHER CHANCE. I've created several in the last few years - I Can't keep ANY, they've ALL been blocked Blue2020 (talk) 02:32, 29 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Oh, you're a block evading abuser of multiple accounts, then? --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 02:36, 29 July 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blue2020It was created as a replacement NOT a sock puppet. It was created because you shut PantherMan off too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blue2020 (talkcontribs) 03:12, 29 July 2019 (UTC) Reply

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Blue2020 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #27231 was submitted on Oct 21, 2019 03:39:14. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 03:39, 21 October 2019 (UTC) Reply

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Blue2020 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #27357 was submitted on Oct 29, 2019 03:44:53. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 03:44, 29 October 2019 (UTC)Reply