Unblock request

edit
 
This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Boneabone (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
Boneabone (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

[[Wikipedia:Autoblock|Autoblocked]] because your IP address was recently used by "[[User:Nylonman2000|Nylonman2000]]". The reason given for Nylonman2000's block is: "[[WP:Vandalism-only account|Vandalism-only account]]".


Decline reason: Yeah, I wonder why the system would have tagged you as being on the same IP address as a vandal. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:27, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry and vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Unblock Request

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Boneabone (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm sorry for vandalizing the glorius wkikpedia. The I reason behind the evidence saying I sockpuppeted was the me and my bro have the same IP. I also set up his account for him. Thats why it said I sockpuppeted. Again I'm VERY SORRY for vandalizing. I know vandalizing is bad I just did not then so please forgive me for my actions. I will no longer vandalize wikipedia or other platforms. I am very sorry. Boneabone (talk) 19:19, 17 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Saying my brother did it is never a good reason for unblocking. Voice of Clam 06:15, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Boneabone (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm sorry for sock puppeting and vandalizing wikipedia. I now understand what I did was wrong and I am sorry for my actions. I am sorry,please forgive me for my actionsBoneabone (talk) 17:23, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

No. You've demonstrated pretty clearly you have every intention of harming the project. Your best bet is to go six months with zero edits, then apply under WP:SO. You'll need to be substantially more convincing at that time. Yamla (talk) 00:06, 19 February 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Someone else will review this request, but you must not remove previous requests whilst you are still blocked. In addition, your best chance of being unblocked is to give details of what constructive edits you would like to make. Voice of Clam 17:33, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Unblock request

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Boneabone (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Look,I'm sorry for vandalizing and I promise I will help wikipedia and other wikimedia projects. All I ask for is just another chance. I know I screwed up with vandalizing and sock puppetry and I also acknowlege the fact I sockpuppeted and I'm sorry for it. So please give me a second chance and I will help wikimedia projects like wikipedia. I'm not looking for remorse just a second chance. So I just need a second chance and I can do better and I will do better. All I need is just a second chance and I've taken a few days to think about my actions and I am better than what I did and I will do better.I just need a second chance. I also plan on editing more "outdated" or "rarely edited" articles for wikipedia. I know adding citations is best for articles and I will add citations.Boneabone (talk) 17:48, 23 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

No engagement by user. Boneabone, as a confirmed negative editor previously, you inherently will need to work somewhat harder to convince an admin to extend another chance Nosebagbear (talk) 14:57, 9 March 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • One of the best ways to demonstrate that you'd do better if unblocked is to provide a specific example of a constructive edit you'd make if unblocked:
  1. What article would you change?
  2. What text would you add or change?
  3. What reliable source(s) would you cite to support the change?
C.Fred (talk) 17:56, 23 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Unblock request

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Boneabone (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Look, I've been reflecting on what I did in the past. I just want to adress a couple of things. 1. I know sock puppeting is bad and im sorry for that. 2.I know vandalizing is bad and im also sorry for that. 3.I also know that unciting resources is bad and I will cite more sources in the future. There, I just think what I did is wrong and I want to fix it by contributing to articals that need updating or is out of date.Boneabone (talk) 18:50, 2 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

If you knew these things were bad, why did you do them? As noted, the SO time has not passed yet, so you would need to be highly convincing with any request that you choose to make now, this doesn't qualify. As creating a new article is probably the hardest thing to do on Wikipedia, my suggestion would be that you start smaller and edit existing articles first; please propose a sourced edit you would make to an existing article. 331dot (talk) 09:45, 9 May 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It hasn't even half the time that the standard offer recommends (6 months). If you want to skip to the front of the line, at least make an unblock request that shows what we're missing out on. For example, post an example of an edit that you'd like to make. Post it here on your talk page, like: "Chicken Police won the XYZ award for best video game, and I would add that to the article, cited to IGN's news story at [insert URL here]." NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:24, 3 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Something that i forgot to put in the orginal request is that I plan to add an artical for isle public schools. I want to add it because thats the school i went to for high school. Boneabone (talk) 18:47, 3 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding User:Boneabone/sandbox/Boneabone

edit

  Hello, Boneabone. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Boneabone/sandbox/Boneabone, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 10 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, User:Boneabone/sandbox/Boneabone

edit
 

Hello, Boneabone. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox/Boneabone".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:35, 7 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Unblock Request

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Boneabone (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

alright,its been 2 or 3 years since i last edited on wikipedia.and i will help contribute to wikipedia as much as possible for me todo, and for my past mistakes,i am sorry. they will never,never happen again. i will make sure to add credible sources to every edit i make.i wont edit any of the pages i have vandalized.i see that there is confusion on whether or not i have disclosed all my other accounts.(nylonman2003).i only have ever had one other account(but it is a shared IP. sorry if there was any confusion.) Boneabone (talk) 19:43, 4 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I cannot CU clear this request. There's been   Possible block evasion as WP:LOUTSOCK earlier this month to vandalise Wikipedia. Additionally, it's clear that this user has not yet disclosed all their sockpuppet accounts. I want to be clear, I'm not saying they definitely evaded the block, only that the CU data raises serious concern about this. --Yamla (talk) 19:16, 5 December 2023 (UTC)Reply