User talk:Bongwarrior/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

→

Archive 10

Reply.

Hey thanks. I wasn't aware that what I did was wrong. Thanks for reverting me! RuneWiki⁷⁷⁷ 21:19, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Bong warrior

Hello. What does you user name mean Dimadozen (talk) 01:50, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi Dimadozen. It doesn't mean anything in particular, it's just a name I think is funny. See bong, if you don't know what that is already. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:05, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

I thought it may have meant something like that but I know some Asian people have the name bong as a surname and a good surname at that. I also thought you were implying that you were some kind of warrior but with a bong. Dimadozen (talk) 02:11, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

LeBron James

Thanks for warning Wannabeaballa. I've warned him too today already. Burner0718 (talk) 22:26, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks...

...for reverting the porno on my user page from Bigearl... I see that he's now blocked -- quick work! Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) ^(talk/cont) 03:23, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Angus Maxim has been killed... by YOU

Hi, you deleted my artical on Angus Maxim, who has a very rare subject going on in New Zealand, as I live in Australia, we know a lot about NZ and it's people, if you can, can you PLEASE restore it.

Thanks 8) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Work56734 (talk • contribs) 08:51, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi Work. It looked to be a page about yourself, and it's not really appropriate for Wikipedia. Have a look at our notability guidelines to see what I mean. However, if you'd like to recreate the page on your userpage, I don't think anyone would have a problem with that. Welcome to Wikipedia, and don't be too discouraged. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 09:09, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Just an I'm-intrigued question: What exactly was wrong with this article the user has mentioned, Bongwarrior? Wilhelmina Will (talk) 08:57, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Hey WW, nothing too bad, but not a notable subject. It had to go. --Bongwarrior (talk) 09:09, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm presuming he's a newbie. Judged by the fact that his talkpage has a red link, he also has not been told of where to go to look for help. But don't worry. Being part of the welcoming commitee, I'll see to it he knows where to go. Have a good day, Bongwarrior! Wilhelmina Will (talk) 22:23, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism revertion

Hi! Thanks for your repeated efforts in reverting vandals, such as with User:Crustillicus. Could I remind you though please, that reverting the vandalism is only the first stage in the process - the vandals do need to be warned. The templates on Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace/Multi-level templates are there to make it easier for us. I appreciate that it is a little bit more work to do that, but what it does mean is that the user, if they are a serial vandal, gets blocked so much quicker: administrators will generally only block if they have had sufficient warnings. If they aren't serial vandals, sometimes just a brief warning on their page is sufficient to get them to stop (and so less vandalism for all round to revert).

If you find putting warnings on the pages to be a hassle, I understand that there are a number of aids to help, such as WP:TW. I don't use them myself, as my computer settings at work prevent me from using such things, but I've heard that they are really good.

Thanks, StephenBuxton (talk) 12:13, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Good advice, true, but not really applicable in this case. Check the times: you warned the user once, they stopped vandalizing one minute later, and the problem was solved. I didn't feel the need to pile on more warnings just for the sake of warning. I also fail to see what you hoped to accomplish by warning that particular user to stop vandalizing, an hour and a half after they had already stopped vandalizing. --Bongwarrior (talk) 12:29, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair comment about the belated warning, I probably didn't need to do it in that instance (I would have added it a lot sooner had my morning break been a bit longer). However, I generally go along the lines of a warning for each item of vandalism (or sets, if I am undoing multiple edits). The way I see it is that the sooner the final warning is passed, the sooner they can be blocked.

Looking back over that last sentence makes me sound like a rabid vandalism-reverter! I can assure you though that I do exercise the "assume good faith policy" - it is just with the really nasty vandals (you can usually spot them - the ones who replace the entire page with racist slurs or the like), I want them off the site as quickly as possible. StephenBuxton (talk) 13:00, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

My UserPage

Thanks. LessHeard vanU (talk) 10:01, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

An apropos award

krimpet✽ has passed you the WikiJoint! WikiJoints promote... uh... promote... help with... do... wiki... something... yeah... uh, what was I saying? WikiJoints help promote, uh, wiki stuff... and help with... {{subst:User:Krimpet/WikiJoint}}... huh?

...bleh, I see you've received several of these already. My bad. :P krimpet✽ 11:12, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

One can never have too many. Thanks. --Bongwarrior (talk) 11:15, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Thiessen and Wheel of Fortune (UK)

I notice you are a frequent Wikipedia user and have edited the Tiffani Thiessen article. There's a user at 76.8.176.57 who is making a series of edits stating that Thiessen will host the Wheel of Fortune UK edition. Looking at his edit history I found edits that were promptly reverted, so I reverted his poorly made edit to Thiessen's article and left a talk message for him to cut it out. But there seems to be a theme to his edits and now I'm a little worried that I'm jumping the gun a bit. I can't find any corraboration on the net about a link between Thiessen and WOF. Anyway, if this is an elaborate edit-hoax, someone with more wikipedia experience than me should look into it. --Mike Wilson (talk) 07:00, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

You did the right thing, don't worry about that. I couldn't find any evidence to support his edits either. Hopefully your warning will convince him to knock it off. Thanks for being vigilant, take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:33, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion for The Other Nite Show

Hi, I'd like to request you delete The Other Nite Show. It is a non notable community radio show from a minor AM station (and therfore not notable, if you don't delete it any other Australian community radio show could put up a page. Cheers, Ryan. 122.148.64.45 (talk) 13:00, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Well, there is now a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Other Nite Show; it looks like another editor created it for you. Would you like to let the discussion run its course, or would you rather the discussion be closed so you can prod it again? Let me know, and I'll ask the other editor to withdraw the AfD nomination if needed. If you'd rather just let it run, you can go there to give your reasons. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:24, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Weird...

Usually, I'm just a regular jackass though... :) Jmlk17 04:59, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Amber Benson

Sorry, my mistake... I thought you were the vandal. Wil lget glasses! :-) - Duribald (talk) 08:21, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

No problem, you fixed it so quickly I didn't even have time to type up an indignant response. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:25, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Hello! Can we get another block on User:58.161.146.227? He is back doing the same vandalism to Amber Benson? Would it be possible to request protection for that article too? I forget where to go do that. Thanks. Web Warlock (talk) 16:51, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi Web Warlock. Someone did the block already, three days. If he keeps it up we'll go with longer blocks. It doesn't look like protection is necessary right now, because most of the vandalism is coming from just that one IP. Thanks for letting me know, I'll try to keep an eye on it. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:12, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you! I appreciate all the work you and hte other Admins do here. Web Warlock (talk) 21:55, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

good job

good job keeping the featured article correct. you caught it pretty fastWikid00d88 (talk) 04:40, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism?

I find it outrageous that on a Wiki page devoted to an artist, the majority of the text is just negative commentary in the form of quotes from another person. Why not restrict that kind of writing to the page of the person who's doing the bashing? I'm sorry, making someone's quotes seem absurd when they shouldn't be there in the first place doesn't constitute vandalism, especially on what is rumored to be democratically self-regulating website. If the guy who I'm "quoting" doesn't like it, he can change it.

-Joel V

If you feel the article is unbalanced, by all means fix it. No one is stopping you. But you don't have the right to add obvious nonsense, with misleading edit summaries, and think it will go undetected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:01, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Aw, OK.

-Joel V

Do you know certain that Mitt Romney Did not Invent the Bolo Tie?

Well, smarty? Do ya?

Go Steelers!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by MittRomney2008!!! (talk • contribs) 23:54, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

User:-=CHAINSAW GRINGO=-

I've given -=CHAINSAW GRINGO=- a v4 warning. He's about to go out the door. Corvus cornix_talk 00:29, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

I was willing to let it slide, he seems to have stopped for the moment. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:33, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

He vandalized your User page and mine, and has repeatedly vandalized the school page, as well as uploading copyrighted images. He needs to tread warily. Looks like his User name won't fit into the user template. We probably ought to report that to somebody. Corvus cornix_talk 00:35, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Scott Parkin

You are wrong Bongwarrior. Scott "Spankie" Parkin looks really good in gray. For those in the activist community in Houston, TX, Scott was Affectionately known as Spankie. I will never forgive you for this mistake. I would strongly advise you to revert the changes, Bongwarrior. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chocolatechipyeah (talk • contribs) 09:38, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you bongwarrior, I didn't realize I was making such an egregious error. I will make a better effort in the future. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gjohnson12 (talk • contribs) 05:28, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Choralw

Choralw (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) appears to exist for a single purpose. I think the user's edits should be read carefully. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 19:29, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

And an anon 142.162.15.244 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 19:31, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Never mind the first one, he's been taken care of. I'll keep an eye on the anon. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 19:33, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

the DJ Instinct page

I am DJ Instinct and I am putting this up on your page because my page you took down which was used for myself to be put out and reach listeners a little bit easier i dont understand whats insignicifant about that Instinct101 (talk) 05:36, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy it here, but please don't use it for self-promotion. Please have a look at WP:COI and WP:BIO to see what I mean, as well as music-specific requirements at WP:MUSIC. If you are notable enough to have an entry, someone else will usually create an article for you. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:48, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Sajav

Hey, why did you relist then revert the relist on AFD? -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 05:04, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

I didn't. I added it to today's AfD log, then I removed it from the January 24 AfD log. It only needs to be in one log at a time. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:07, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh, silly me. Thanks. -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 05:09, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for bringing some of my nominations in today's page. It will increase chances to reach a consensus. Cheers. -- Niaz^{(Talk • Contribs)} 12:27, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Question?

Do you have any ideas for a balsa wood bridge presentation? We need the help desperately!

-3D —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.38.98.233 (talk) 15:48, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Ha, no, sorry. You're on your own. Sounds like fun though. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:56, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

what up

hey hey. whats up? ElisaEXPLOSiON^talktome.

Hi, not much. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:56, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

#4

What is #4 ? I believed it was first. If I am wrong I apologized.

--Sweet buttuery tart crust (talk) 09:46, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I think that's supposed to mean it's currently ranked #4 according to the current U.S. News and World Report college rankings. Thanks for catching the vandalism to that article, I only reverted back because the vandal wiped out the alumni descriptions. In the future, check the article history; if the vandal was the last person to edit the page (which is usually the case), you can just click "undo". It's a lot easier that way. Welcome, and have fun. --Bongwarrior (talk) 09:55, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Laigle

I m writing in French an article about mathilde laigle and i know she was teacher in wellesley college. When my article will be finish, could you help me to translate it in english ?

--Sweet buttuery tart crust (talk) 09:49, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

She was in fact a faculty member in 1912 and after.

--Sweet buttuery tart crust (talk) 09:51, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Sure, I'll be happy to help in any way I can. I don't speak French, so I'm not sure how much help I'll be. But if you have any questions or need any guidance, I am at your disposal. --Bongwarrior (talk) 10:00, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Reverting my edits

Mr. Bongwarrior, sir, I apologize if my action has appeared uncivil. I only meant to delete the controversy section from this article. All of the controversy is unsubstantiated rumour- mongering. So I want to do away with it completely. Dahn Yoga, opposed to what this article states, is full of good, giving people and its master is largely responsible for that. Mention of lawsuits is dirty business- sometimes people read this nonsense and decide to forego Dahn altogether, leading them to more stressful and unhappy lives. So you must now understand why it is important for people's well being if they don't see this absolute nonsense "controversy stuff." Can you please advise how I can go about deleting and getting rid of all of this controversy jargon?

Rick Ross and Steve Hassan particularly are two evil, negative men who spread their lies and slander about Dahn and even Scientologists and other religions. Their views and allegations are not relevant to Dahn. I hope you will see what I am getting at here and advise me well. I will be happier in Wiki world if you do! Thanks much sir! Matthew Laffert (talk) 10:29, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

I forgot to say:Hassan and Ross don't have real degrees or knowledge. You can quote me on that. Controversy is never good for anyone, if you can catch me. I need to know if you get me here, understand? I can make myself more clear.

Matthew Laffert (talk) 10:31, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi Matthew. You can't just delete the entire controversy section because you wish it would go away. You are undoubtedly more familiar with the subject than I am, but I looked over the disputed section and it appears to be well-referenced. If there are any specific elements that have incomplete or unreliable references, by all means take them out, or raise the issue on the article's talk page. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 10:48, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Wrestlinglover

It's okay,I didn't really care about it anyway.--WillC (talk) 00:58, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Teletubbies

That user:Simba&Balto doesn't appear to be "accidentally" removing anything--that's the second time he/she/it/they have removed that same section. Glad to see someone [WP:AGF|AGF] but in this case, I think it may be too generous....I'm heading over to the talk page now, to see if the user cares to discuss his/her concerns about that section, or what.Gladys J Cortez 16:14, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Ho-Humness

Looking for your opinion (semi-randomly): what should be done with Ho-Humness? I wasn't sure if it was CSD-able or whether it was simply "odd, but salvageable". —Noah 08:29, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

My first thought is to redirect it to boredom, but I'm don't think that would qualify as a useful redirect. It's pretty obviously a neologism, which really isn't speediable, although it could possibly qualify under CSD A1, little or no context. Best bet is probably prodding. In any case, I don't think it's salvageable. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:44, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Ah yes, PROD would be a good solution. Thanks. —Noah 08:46, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!

[1] --barneca (talk) 13:07, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Like your contribs

All your bud are belong to me.mike (talk) 03:32, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Budgie - Budgie.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Budgie - Budgie.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:13, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Fixed. I hate looking like a noob :( --Bongwarrior (talk) 10:21, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my page. --Nlu (talk) 09:16, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me, too, for looking out after my user page. I left a reply to that particular editor. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:53, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me. I knew that AfD I closed (first time!) didn't look quite right, but I couldn't figure out what I'd done wrong. Thanks for fixing it. MKoltnow 07:45, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Controversy is bad for business

We Dahn followers would be grateful if you helped to make all the controversy surrounding Dahn invisible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthew Laffert (talk • contribs) 15:18, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Earl Newton

You may not remember doing this but, you erased a page entitled, Earl Newton. Why did you do it? Creamy3 (talk) 21:32, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

It was eligible to be speedily deleted per CSD G4, a recreation of material that was deleted after an AfD discussion. The discussion in question can be found here. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:02, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Wow, I'm a retard.

I accidentally blocked you when I was going after this dude who was blanking your user page.  :( Feel free to troutslap as many times as you would like. :P --slakr^\ talk / 03:26, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I saw, don't worry about it. I'd never seen the block screen before, so that was sorta interesting. Thanks for looking out, take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:28, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

I think that "page-blanking dude" was angry because you deleted a page he did, right? I'm not sure what was wrong with it, but if you'll say, I'll explain to him. You don't have to worry, Bongwarrior; just sit back and relax. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 03:31, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

No further communication is needed. It was an attack page, and he was left the proper warning. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:37, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

An attack page? Oooh, a vicious vandal! Love those (in a detesting kind of way!) WHat was it about, might I ask? Just the gist of it. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 03:41, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

I don't remember, it wasn't particularly vicious. Called someone fat, I think. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:46, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

nothing

hi —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sgt.sexy (talk • contribs) 19:55, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Happy Valentine's Day!

User:Wilhelmina Will has wished you a happy Valentine's day, and good luck in love and friendship!

A short/sweet little message, which I hope has made your day better! Happy Valentine's Day!!! Wilhelmina Will (talk) 02:24, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Deletion

Hey man why you all up in my grillz deletin my Kertucky page. I mean give a homeboy some space. We only write this for givin the info to the public. If you don agree wit wut I write then talk to us man, but dont go around getin up in our GRILLZ! Word. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Da stooges (talk • contribs) 23:22, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

What the hell?

Babies are really killed in abortion clinics. Don't deny the truth that babies are murdered in abortion clinics. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cl3rkenwell (talk • contribs) 05:52, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you. But on Wikipedia, we write from a neutral point of view, no matter our personal moral convictions. Saying that an abortion clinic is a place "where babies are killed" is not neutral. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:08, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

It's just the simple, objective, neutral truth.

Babies are really killed though. It's just a simple, unbiased fact. Don't give me that nonsense about unborn babies being a "clump of cells" cuz we are too! Just a bigger clump. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cl3rkenwell (talk • contribs) 06:11, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

You know, that was actually unneccessary

Deleting Val Klassen's page. I redirected it to the creator's talkpage, wasn't that enough? Wilhelmina Will (talk) 08:29, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

I know you were trying to help, but user pages or user talk pages shouldn't be linked from article space. That particular user went on a bit of a nonsense page creation spree, but he/she had quieted down last I checked. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:39, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh, okay. You know, you just gotta feel sorry for those new account members who create those nonsense pages; a lot of them are actually in good faith (which you probably know), and it's kind of sad when their articles have to be deleted (or killed, as I usually say). Don't you agree? Wilhelmina Will (talk) 08:49, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion

Hey Bongwarrior – I'm noticing that as you're speedying stuff, I'm tagging it using twinkle in exactly the same minute and it's recreating the page. Just wanted to apologise, as it's not on purpose... Cheers —αlεx•mullεr 11:06, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

No need to apologize, I figured it was something like that. --Bongwarrior (talk) 11:09, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Billy Harper

Would you mind if I recreated this article as a redirect to Kentucky gubernatorial election, 2007? While Harper wasn't notable enough to be a standalone article, he was a notable part of the election, so I think a redirect makes sense, the article on the election does cover him. --Rividian (talk) 00:56, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Sounds like a good idea to me. I unlinked his name in the Anne Northup, Dick Morris and United States gubernatorial elections, 2007 articles. If you're creating a redirect, feel free to relink his name in those articles if you think it would be helpful. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:04, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

NY Giants

I'm afraid there has been some sort of mistake. I recently edited the New York Giants page and now I have just been alerted that not only was my contribution deleted, but I have been blocked. I do not mean to offend, but I think that someone must have made a serious error. The link directed me to you so I hope you will help me get rid of my ban and get my information back onto this site. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.253.51.234 (talk) 04:58, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

You aren't blocked. If you continue to vandalize, that could change. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:01, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: How to revert vandalism

Thank you for that comment :)

CWii_{(Talk|Contribs)} has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

I love when I get comments like that! CWii_{(Talk|Contribs)} 22:17, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Userpage

Thanks for removing vandalism from my page. I really appreciate it. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:31, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

OOPS

Sorry about that. Apparently "rollback" reverts the current change, even if it's changed since the diff screen is generated. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 02:09, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem, thanks for looking out. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:14, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:User talk:Smokebluntfool

I unblocked him.   jj137 (talk) 03:22, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Glad to hear it, thank you. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:24, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

User:Robisim

Thank you for the follow up Jeepday (talk) 13:25, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Username watcher bot problem

Thank you for spotting my error in editing the namewatcher bot's blacklist: I should have caught it myself, but was not diligent enough; please accept my apologies for the inconvenience caused. -- The Anome (talk) 21:17, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem at all, but please double check my fix to make sure I did it correctly. I really don't have the foggiest idea how any of those strings work, I just replaced the one string with an earlier version. Should be okay, but that stuff's all Greek to me. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:21, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Brianna Denison

Three keeps to seven deletes is consensus - immediately after an article has undergone significant expansion and sourcing? Really? --66.214.221.166 (talk) 05:06, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome to disagree. Consensus is consensus, and in this case the consensus was "delete". If you feel I have misinterpreted the discussion, you are welcome to bring it up at deletion review. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:25, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Deletion Review for Brianna Denison

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Brianna Denison. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. James Bond (talk) 07:06, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

WP:UAA, user Jenhancock

(→User-reported: decline Jenhancock, it's a name, see Hancock (surname), list empty)

Got to say its incredible you figured this one. Never knew that "Hancock" was an actual last name. Though i doubt i would be happy with it in the current English orientated world :) Excirial ^{(Talk,Contribs)} 08:15, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

ANSWER MY QUESTION

Someone is a big man haveing to go to there friend to do what you can not and you carnt even answerDanmetal666 (talk) 06:49, 27 February 2008 (UTC) what i asked how is it innapropate it was a quote from one of the members of greenpece Australia

I don't believe it Bongwarrior. I console, I explain, I encourage, and I guide, yet he still doesn't take the heed! Some people just aren't willing to learn. Well, I'm sorry that you had to endure that user's harshness. I tried my best. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 08:30, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Larry Drew, Jr.

Is this article: Larry Drew, Jr. wiki-worthy or should it be speedy tagged? I can't tell. -WarthogDemon 21:14, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Nice article, but it looks like he's just a high school basketball player. It sort of asserts importance, so I would probably prod it. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:21, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Will do. I'll keep an eye on it first though. It's been recently made so I don't want to prod it within 24 hours of its creation. -WarthogDemon 21:22, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Ash (artist) deletion?

Hi! I am new to wikipedia, I don't really understand the reason why you deleted the article ash (artist), i think the article was OK with the wikipedia rules for new articles. thank you (Solanas (talk) 08:26, 29 February 2008 (UTC))

Hi Solanas. The discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ash (artist) indicated that the subject does not yet meet Wikipedia's notability requirements. After such a discussion, further re-creations of the same article are eligible to speedily deleted per CSD G4, without the need for another AfD discussion. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:39, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

User:Pumpmeup

Hi there

Just a note to let you know, I've responded at my talk page. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 07:27, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

My Userpage

Hi. I only just noticed that you has reverted some vandalism to my userpage back in January. So a very belated thank you from me!--NeoNerd 16:32, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For helping keep my userpage free of the (constant) vandalism it has been under fire for recently, I award you the RickK Anti-Vandal Barnstar Steve Crossin (talk) 09:47, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

who r u

WHO ARE YOU ----awesomepossum604

I am Bongwarrior. Who are you? --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:25, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

i am someone who doesnt like jake shurman and doesnt take wikipedia so serious—Preceding unsigned comment added by Awesomepossum604 (talk • contribs) in the not-too-distant past

i dont know who put you in charge of this Andy Fraser thing, but my story has as much right to be up there as any one elses. so why should you change it and tell me im vandalising? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.194.47.34 (talk) 11:12, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

About Nathan Brittain

$NathanBrittain$

Hi Bongwarrior. I was just wondering why my article on Nathan Brittain was deleted? because it is not a "hoax". To be honest i don't know how it was classed as a hoax because its true. I even had refrences to back it up with. I'm new to wikipedia and i don't know how to cite refrences, so i need to improve that (if thats another reason why article was deleted). I understand that Nathan Brittain played for very small football (soccer) clubs, but i think it deserves credit to be on Wikipedia because he was such a great player in Luxemberg and Iceland.

I would really appreciate a response to discuss this matter further.

Thanks, from NBdonkey. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nbdonkey (talk • contribs) 12:17, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Pirates

There was nothing said in the edit summary about it being archived. I assumed it was vandalism. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 04:57, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Not a problem, I understand. I probably would have done the same thing you did, but I had seen that editor helping out with a few articles and I didn't think he was the vandalizing type. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:01, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

I had noticed that fact after I reverted it, and at that point thought he had simply made a mistake. However, the mistake was mine, in not reading carefully enough. My apologies to all concerned. :) Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 05:40, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Tunaissmelly

Hello... thanks for the note. Well, the name popped up on the 'bot list, and did not come across as a serious attempt to create an acceptable ID. Factor in the nonsense article, and the soft-block seemed warranted. I won't object if you feel inclined to revert, however. Cheers. --Ckatz^chat_spy 09:39, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Granted, not every username is a Picasso like "Bongwarrior" or "Ckatz", but unless it's obviously offensive or otherwise bogus, there is no real need to block. The deleted page is a conduct issue, not a username issue. I'm not going to unblock, because the user has probably created a new name by now if he's really that interested in editing and/or creating nonsense pages. But please try to be a little more selective in the future, especially when it comes to bot reports. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 09:57, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Concert T-shirt

I just noticed that Black Concert T-Shirt got nominated for deletion and then moved. As the original author of the page, I was notified, but didn't get a chance to comment before the process was closed. I do object to moving the article. The idea of the article is to document the fad/trend/phenomenon that is the Black Concert t-shirt, not concert t-shirts in general. Concert t-shirts have become a small part of the larger merchandising efforts by bands and groups, but the idea of the black concert t-shirt is much different. The black t-shirt is a cultural identifier, a uniform of sorts, that different groups of people have used and continue to use to identify themselves. Yes there are many other colors now, but the traditional idea of a black concert t-shirt needs to be emphasized. At the very least, the article now needs to be more extensive to cover concert t-shirts in general with a specific section on the idea of the black concert t-shirt. As it is, someone is going to come in and remove all references to black, which will lose the original idea of the article. Then the article will have even more cause to be deleted or to be merged with concert merchandising or something. I would like your thoughts on the matter. --Mattarata (talk) 03:59, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Well, if you think the article would be better off at the old name, you can always bring it up on the article's talk page and see what others think. But judging from the talk page, and especially from the AfD discussion, it looks like the vast majority of editors were in favor of the move. As for your other concern, it also seemed like most of the editors agreed that the "black" aspect of the T-shirts should be emphasized, so I really don't foresee a problem there. Hope this helps, good luck with the article. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:02, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

thanks--Mattarata (talk) 19:41, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Plano Senior High School

Hi, I have just seen that you reverted this edit: [2] Obviously, it's vandalism. However, somebody announces that he will be "with a pipe bomb outside it ready to blow at 9.30am". Does vandalism like this, making a real threat, happen always here? If not, maybe we should do something about it? Kind regards, --Abrech (talk) 22:22, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

It happens sometimes. Depending on the seriousness of the threat, it's sometimes mentioned on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents and/or the proper authorities are notified. This incident strikes me as more of a bored kid than a serious threat. I've blocked the IP for two days, and I really don't think any further action is needed in this case. Obviously, this is no laughing matter. If you feel it's "better safe than sorry" and we should pursue this a little further, let me know or bring it up on the ANI noticeboard. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 22:38, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your note. I am relatively new to the fighting-Vandalism-business, and I haven't seen something like this before. I am located in Germany and, therefore, unable to do anything about this threat personally. So I left this note. Since I thought you might be offline, I also posted messages like this at the help desk and on the talk page of WP:AIV (close to where it should be posted, but no cigar ;)). Since you have the much more educated judgement on this issue than I have, I don't think further actions are needed. Kind regards and once again thanks for your answer, --Abrech (talk) 22:54, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Reverting vandalism

Thanks. :) Black Falcon ^(Talk) 03:53, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

OrthodoxJewAgainstIsrael

Hello... I see you've noticed this editor as well. Any thoughts as to what to do - the name is debatable, and the edits are hit-and-miss. (They also seem quite advanced for a brand-new account.) --Ckatz^chat_spy 08:51, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm just waiting and watching right now. Most of his reverts are almost random, but a few of his edits make some sense and could be considered good faith. The speed of his edits is what was really worrying me, but he seems to be taking a break right now. If you think a username block is in order (it probably is) I swear I won't complain about it. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:59, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

On further consideration, I blocked it myself, and allowed creation of a new account. --Bongwarrior (talk) 09:06, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback. Yes, the speed was one of the odd things; the self-congratulation on the user page was interesting as well. Cheers. --Ckatz^chat_spy 09:14, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

why?

why did you delete my article?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Martin DMC (talk • contribs) 00:25, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi Martin DMC, welcome to Wikipedia. It was eligible to be speedily deleted as a biographical article that doesn't state the importance of the subject. If you were writing about yourself, you can do that on your userpage. For information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:35, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

I feel pretty bad

I'm the one who left that stupid comment about the icthyosaur on the Keira Knightly page. I'm writing an article about how wikipedia is more reliable than teachers will tell you for my school paper, and as I point I wanted to see how fast it would take to get vandalism off of a page. I know it was pretty stupid, but I thought it was for a good overall cause, and I want to thank you for your (unknowning) cooperation and apologize for wasting your time... I always take the integrity of this project very seriously so I felt bad doing it regardless of the cause... ok, I'll shut up now. 24.236.159.212 (talk) 22:25, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Ha, I don't think I've ever had anyone apologize before. No permanent harm done I suppose. Good luck with the article. --Bongwarrior (talk) 09:50, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism

someone is vandalising my discussion page and you reverted my removal of the vandalism. Was that intentional? Telaviv1 (talk) 10:48, 12 March 2008 (UTC) OK I see that it we must have crossed reversions. Telaviv1 (talk) 10:51, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

I've blocked as many of the socks as I could find. If you like, I can semi-protect your talk page for a while. Up to you, though. --Bongwarrior (talk) 11:00, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

actually my talk page has never been so interesting ;-)Telaviv1 (talk) 11:04, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Ok, just let me know if you change your mind. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 11:07, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

New admirer

Makes you laugh doesn't it. :P Rudget. 11:39, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Aw crap, now I have to change my password. --Bongwarrior (talk) 11:42, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

I see you're not the only one with an admirer/stalker. User talk:Lancebassfan must be mad, so thanks for blocking here. AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 18:45, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Heads up

RFCN right here. I guess it has to be seen/dealt with —αlεx•mullεr 18:30, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the notice, it was already closed before I had a chance to complain. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:05, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppet

Hi, I believe I have found an obvious sockpuppet: You blocked User:Kingkong21212 who consistently vandalized the Dude article. Also linked to this username is User:Kingkong81818. You may want to consider temporarily IP blocking this user. Thanks. PseudoOne ^{(talk • contribs • count)} 06:39, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

The autoblock should take care of the IP for a while. For how long, I have no idea actually, but it should be sufficient. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:45, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Layla27/Ruby Tuesday et al

I've filed a checkuser report [3] on this one - it's the third RFCU, and I'm getting tired of wrangling with him. Acroterion _(talk) 03:29, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I'd forgotten all about him/her. Have to admit, the "consensus building" on Talk:Nuclear technology sort of amused me. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:33, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

All I had to do was wait until the "consensus" was built and bag 'em all. Acroterion _(talk) 03:41, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Wrong

As any intellligent human being could see i reverted the "Hell" Edit as it was an accident. Please be sure you know what you are talking about before you sent threatening messages to people. THNAK YOU! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Desparity997 (talk • contribs) 07:19, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Please, let's not have any more "accidents" like this. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:28, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

why revert my edit

you knew that stat is questionable i find the asterisk quite justified --128.113.193.133 (talk) 05:32, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

It probably is justified. But, until MLB decides to append some sort of asterisk to the record, we can't really go ahead and do it on our own. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:37, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Obrigado

Thanks for reverting the vandalisme on my userpage. I by inertia in choosing between flaming and blocking vandals. скоморохъ 01:31, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Lost

Help! The nonsense article H.E.R.M.Y.?? you deleted was the content moved (via vandalism) from Lost (TV series), can you get it back??? TheRhani (talk) 07:07, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

I don't think I can. Something sure got screwed up all right. I've put a notice up on WP:AN to see if someone else can do it, but it keeps timing out for me. I'll keep trying it, take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:11, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Ay-yi-yi....

Looks like an IP has a beef with you: diff. Two One Six Five Five ^τ _ʃ 14:31, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

User and talk page

I semi-protected both pages due IP vandalism from Joe5545 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Number8burp (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) who are one and the same. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 14:33, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

We beg you

Please stop trying to destroy the Raljoball page. We put in a lot of work and are making a non-biased website. The sport is very popular in many college campuses including Ohio State University, University of Maryland, University of New Haven, United States Naval Academy, University of Pittsburgh, and Penn State University. We will continue to try our best to prove that Raljoball is a notable sport and is worthy of enty into Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by M102046 (talk • contribs) 01:14, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Awesome. The best way to do that is by providing examples of independent reliable sources discussing Raljoball. I was unable to find any, but since you are more familiar with the sport, perhaps you will have better luck. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:02, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

I noted you just blocked 67.165.219.110 I stumbled across his "fun", but since I'm new, I had no idea who to report him to. For future issues, is it at AN-V? King Pickle (talk) 01:43, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Close, you can report them at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, or just WP:AIV for short, as long as they have been properly warned and continue to vandalize. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:49, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Sunday Funday

Please add my entry for Sunday Funday as it is not just a video game anymore —Preceding unsigned comment added by JWPurvis13 (talk • contribs) 06:21, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

I understand that you feel this is a promotional tool, however, Sunday Funday is widely known as a weekly drinking event that is participated by thousands of people. We can co-exist but there is no reason why you should be deleting Sunday Funday as an event. Yes, there is a video game Sunday Funday, but there are other forms of Sunday Funday in which you are holding back from the public. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JWPurvis13 (talk • contribs) 06:34, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair enough, but please do these three things for me:

• Please read Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Your first article before proceeding any further. All content must be verifiable by reliable sources.

• Do not continue to blank or otherwise tamper with the Sunday Funday page. It was here first, and it appears to be a lot more notable. If you really think this subject deserves an article, try Sunday Funday (event) or something similar.

• Please do not attempt to use Wikipedia to advertise. The content you replaced Sunday Funday with wasn't an attempt to educate, it was an attempt to promote. Many editors put a lot of free time into this project, and we resent someone trying to use it to make a quick buck.

Good luck. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:49, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Bong

Go smoke a bong. Thethirdrealm (talk) 10:16, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, I intend to. --Bongwarrior (talk) 10:19, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Dr. Evil

Hi, I'm sorry for vandalising Dr. Evil, I won't do it again. Zubey1 (talk) 09:51, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

There are about a billion IP addresses, you'll never block them all! Ya'akov1234 (talk) 09:56, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

I can try. --Bongwarrior (talk) 09:58, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Reminds me of the admin (I think it was Ohnoitsjamie) who warned an IP. The IP responded by bragging that it had 1,000 IPs and Jamie could never block them all. Jamie simply blocked and said "1 down, 999 to go." Enigma ^message 14:06, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

User:140.175.214.33

Hi! Could you please block him? He is really doing stuff, from wich we belive its wrong so we revert to even worser revisions. Besides he is blanking pages. A block seems really to be needed. Regards, abf /talk to me/ 10:11, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Frankly, I'm more worried about your edits than his. Here and here you restored vandalism that the IP was trying to remove. Please try to be more careful; slow down a little if you need to. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 10:16, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page! Best, PeterSymonds | talk 07:03, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

My Change

Thanks for informing me about my change, i'm new, and have a burning hatred for Heather Mills. Dragonixta (talk) 13:23, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Dragonixta

Thanks

File:Pie.jpeg

♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ has given you a fresh pie! Pies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a piping hot pie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Bon appetit!

Spread the tastiness of pies by adding {{subst:GivePie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 16:27, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you, I've never seen the pie one before. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:29, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Huh

Hi How Am I meant to take someone who calls themselves bong warrior seriously Lighten up a little mate Take a page out of Australias book —Preceding unsigned comment added by RyanDeVilliers (talk • contribs) 05:50, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Re 88.11.156.68

I've just them a message on their page [4]. Sorry about that. I hope this won't make you scrutinise my reports in future because of this one. Cheers, Steve Crossin (talk to me) 11:25, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[5]

It's no problem. I know you're a good editor. Thank you for taking responsibility and apologizing to the IP. Making mistakes is fine, as long as people are willing to recognize them and admit to them. I have much less patience for someone who makes a mistake, and then tries to hem and haw and refuses to own up to it. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 11:36, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

User:I'll Get You Next Time Gadget

I see that you blocked User:I'll Get You Next Time Gadget and I completely support your decision. However, could you please put a note that this user was blocked at his talk page? Thanks, Nsk92 (talk) 11:34, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Sorry. I didn't mean to confuse anybody. I didn't leave a block message because he's somebody's sockpuppet. I'm not quite sure whose, but I've blocked quite a few of them the past few days. In those sorts of cases, I usually don't leave a block message, mostly in the interests of WP:DENY, but also some laziness mixed in. I am sorry; that's something that occasionally confused me as well back when I was reporting vandals, so I know where you're coming from. I'll keep it in mind in the future, and maybe do things a little differently. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 11:55, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

OK, thanks. The important thing is that the user is blocked. I think he is a sock for the recently banned user User:Loosedance (banned yesterday). They both vandalized Charles Hastings Doyle and Pacem in Terris‎ in a rather similar ways. ‎Regards, Nsk92 (talk) 12:04, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you!

Someone vandalized my Userspace! But a little angel came along and fixed it! Thank you! You can thank others by using {{subst:Vangel}}! Mysdaao ^talk 12:33, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

hey!!

bongwarroir rc-07... speciafically says i am allowed to raise his vnadalized bar!!! he says for me it is ok to vandalize his page so please don't message me unless it is about something i like,... like kirby! --Kirbylevel4 (talk) 23:26, 3 April 2008 (UTC)kirbylevel4

ok

so i have not vandalize mysdadso's page, but rco7 says i can vandalize his page!!!!! ok!!!!? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kirbylevel4 (talk • contribs) 23:33, 3 April 2008 (UTC) it is the end of the world as we know it!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kirbylevel4 (talk • contribs) 23:37, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Show no mercy with this user

here, you blocked the IP for 31 hours. I would have thought after 11! edits to the same page within 9 minutes you would have gone longer. You must be going nicely on the person, i know with an IP it is tough but there was one admin i know who did an indefinite on an IP. At the end of the day you can make an account and all is sweet.

Just a question by the way, is it only after an IP has been blocked that we get to see who it is registered to? At the top you can see this on IPs page. Thanks, keep it up Roadrunnerz45 (talk) 00:52, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Well, IPs can change owners, so indef blocking them is usually out of the question, unless it's an open proxy or something. Since the user was vandalizing quickly, I was more worried about blocking them quickly than the length of the block. 31 hours for now is probably enough, future blocks will usually be increased in length. About the registration info, you can see that at anytime using the toolbox at the bottom of the IP's contrib or talk page. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:07, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

nukeevery1

Changed to a soft block. We'll see what happens. Daniel Case (talk) 02:25, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

deletion log

I saw it! But why A7 :(. Cheers.--Tikiwont (talk) 09:38, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I know. Just messing with you :) --Bongwarrior (talk) 09:40, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Hockey Player Vandalism by 168.169.124.215

After seeing the weight and nationality information that 168.169.124.215 vandalized today on the article for Daniel Briere, I checked his/her other edits and found that they have vandalized the nationality portion for Chris Drury (USA to France), Chris Neil (Canada to France) and Brian Campbell (Canada to France). I fixed Daniel Briere's page, and undid the changes to Drury and Neil; someone else undid the vandalism to Campbell's page before I did.

This person should perhaps be blocked, and hopefully has a static IP. If I find much more blatant vandalism I'll probably request usage of the rollback feature.

Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Randempedestrian (talk • contribs) 17:56, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

I've left a warning on the IP's talk page. I'll try to keep an eye on future edits. Hopefully, he'll knock it off without the need for a block. Thanks, take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:45, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi...

Some n00b used my computer to vandalize star trek. I'm sorry Mr. Bong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.123.41.35 (talk) 19:55, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Sir, that article was a work in progress. I was going to add some citations to it and expand it with different sections when you up and deleted it. Please restore? JeanLatore (talk) 06:56, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Oh by the way I do drugs too, so we should get along together! Friends? JeanLatore (talk) 06:57, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I think it would be best if Anal Sex with Sluts remains deleted. If you feel I have made a mistake, you are welcome to list it at deletion review. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:04, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the RV's man. Revert a single vandalism edit then come back an hour later to that, lol. muchos gracias. -- Shatterzer0 (talk) 07:16, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Deletion Review for Anal_Sex_with_Sluts

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Anal_Sex_with_Sluts. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. JeanLatore (talk) 16:37, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Someone is being cheeky

A user looks like hopping on different computers or some people are ganging up in vandalising this page here writing 'hagger?' Look at the page history, im sure you've seen it. Not sure what can be done. Thanks Roadrunnerz45 (talk) 06:16, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Revert, block, ignore, until he gets tired. He'll wear himself out eventually. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:19, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

That's a lot of different IPs for one event. Why no p.p.? --- Taroaldo (talk) 07:26, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

It's today's Main Page featured article. We try to avoid protecting those as much as possible. In any other case, it would obviously be protected. It was protected earlier, but I unprotected it in the hopes that he would get bored and quit. Hasn't happened yet, so we'll see. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:30, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your help

Hi Bongwarrior,

I'm the guy who attempted a copy & paste move of Rock-paper-scissors to Rock Paper Scissors. It seems I'd forgotten to log in before.

Just thought I'd say how pleased I was to receive a friendly, patient and helpful message in response to my attempted move, rather than "Dont do that OMGWTF!!!11". Admins on other sites should follow your example.

Although it's not your responsibility to help out teh n00bzorz, I figure you must know a fair bit about it. When I attempt to move Rock-paper-scissors to Rock Paper Scissors (the actual name for the sport), I get a message saying that the name is not valid or that a page already exists at that page. Upon looking at the proposed new location, I see that the only content is the redirect tag. Upon removing this, I find that it has been automatically reversed because it is unhelpful.

Just wondering if you could do my move for me, and tell me what I did wrong. If not, no worries, I'll just go to the requested moves page. This way's probably quicker and easier though.

Thanks again.

Cheers, Franklint Franklint (talk) 08:11, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi Franklint, I've been looking at this. Ordinarily you can move a page to your heart's content, but not if the target page already has a history, which is what happened here. The move can only be done by an admin in those cases. It looks like the previous title was Rock, Paper, Scissors until it was moved here a few months ago. I can understand his reasoning, although I'm not a big fan of the hyphens. I don't want to do the move without a discussion, because a solid case could probably be made for two or three variations of the name. Sorry, but propose it on the article's talk page (make sure to put it at the bottom so everyone sees it :), let the discussion run for a little while and I'll be happy to move it to whatever you guys decide. You don't really need to list it at Requested moves, unless you want to; the function of that page is mostly just to list moves that require administrator assistance (I'll do the assisting), but it also gives the discussion a wider audience, which is always a good thing. Good luck, let me know if I can be any help. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:58, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Why Bongwarrior Why

Don't you have better things to do BongwarriorAndrew CP Kelley (talk) 05:37, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

I do, but I don't feel like doing them right now. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:43, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Do you get paid for this Bongwarrior? Why is your user name Bongwarrior anyways? I take it they don't drug test you when you get hired.-Andrew CP Kelley (talk) 05:44, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Nope, we don't get paid. The pursuit of knowledge is its own reward. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:49, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

I don't understand why you do this. Wikipedia is supposed to be for and created by the people. You're acting like an autocratic superior government like that of North Korea or China. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrew CP Kelley (talk • contribs) 05:55, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

I don't understand what you don't understand. Wikipedia is supposed to be improved by everyone...not vandalized by everyone. Thank you BW. While my opinion is no more and no less valuable than any other anonymous posterizer, I see both of those reverted edits you mention as vandalism. Sinneed (talk) 06:56, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

I think you need to stop being such a pansy.-Andrew CP Kelley (talk) 13:04, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Looking at their contribs, Bongwarrior, I think this user needs a time-out. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 18:56, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

That username

I was debating whether to softblock or hardblock. However, I saw that the last part of it was the zip code for the area. Didn't want to chance it being someone stalking the person in question. Was that too jumpy? Blueboy96 21:16, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

It was, in my opinion. I understand your concerns, but it's equally possible that no harm was intended. I would have waited for edits. If you think it was the right call, I have no problem with it, but maybe you'd like to reconsider? Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:23, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Maybe a softblock at least? Even without the stalking issues, 40 characters is way, way too long. Blueboy96 21:25, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Do what you think is right, don't do it just to shut me up :) Personally, I wouldn't have softblocked either (I'm not a huge fan of long name blocks usually), but I have no problem with others doing so. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:30, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

RfA

Questions answered. The Transhumanist 21:59, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

apology

i wish to apologise to wikipedia for the inapropriate changes made to certain pages on this site.......i am sorry —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.42.86.132 (talk) 09:15, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

It's no big deal, just a little extra work for someone to clean up. I assume you were just experimenting, and you see now that changing stuff really does work. Please don't stop editing, just be a little more constructive from now on. Find an article that interests you and see if you can make it better. It can be a lot of fun. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 09:33, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Gears of War 2 Page?

I recently added some characters that will be playable in Gears of War 2...i also cited them...to the Gameinformer Issue 181..why would they get taken off?

Stupified35 (talk) 05:30, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Not sure. Maybe they're trying to keep everything in the List of Gears of War characters and adversaries, or maybe they didn't believe you. I'm not real familiar with the game, so I'm not really sure. If possible, try to find an online reference for it; that way, everyone can check for themselves. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:59, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your time and effort taken in removing vandalism and other naughty business in Wikipedia. Keep it up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raliugar (talk • contribs) 00:18, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the kind words, appreciate it. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:27, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

I have learnt my way's.

Hey, sorry for the monster robot werewolf pirates page (even though it was cool). and don't do drugs, their bad. Peace.Yzzug (talk) 10:18, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

No problem, have fun. And I will try to stay off the pipe. --Bongwarrior (talk) 10:27, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Exit Mundi

Just a request. This is about the article Exit Mundi. Please look at the article and have some comment in the talk page of the article if it meets WP:WEB or not. The article is subject to deletion and various tagging. I am confused. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 10:11, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Belated thanks

I'd like to thank you for this reversion of vandalism on my user page. See you around, "dude."--MrFish^{Go Fish} 17:24, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Vandals

I noticed you seem to have attracted an admirer. Awsome556 (talk · contribs), Awesomeme55 (talk · contribs), and another blatant username violation, in addition to the one you got have all been blocked tonight. Any idea who it is? KnightLago (talk) 02:36, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Nah, just another satisfied customer :) --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:38, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

I have to tell you, you just must made me laugh. :-) KnightLago (talk) 02:42, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Can I delete your pages for 'no significance or important' because your page is crap? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Samdmorgan (talk • contribs) 13:38, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!

Bonadea (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

That was some speedy user page vandalism reverting! Thank you! --Bonadea (talk) 13:50, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

CRAZY

This is ridiculous. My editing of Langham Creek High School is not Vandalism. All the similar pages related to LAngham Creek High School have Notable Alumni edits made all the time. How come all of those are not deleted? Ali.fazal (talk) 17:18, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Notable alumni have to be notable. This and this would seem to indicate that your claims of notability are somewhat exaggerated. --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:04, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Virginia Tech massacre

Okay, that works. Good wordsmithing. --Dynaflow babble 04:08, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks very much, I appreciate that. I don't do enough actual writing, but I chip in when I can. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:19, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Rollback

What?? I have spent atleast the last hour reverting vandalism and you just swoop in and take away my rollback power? Im very sure atleast 99% of my rollbacks are the result of undoing vandalism!! NOT FAIR! --Energizer07 (talk) 11:06, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

I am sorry, but I had no choice. If it was anywhere near 99% I would be ecstatic, but it was more like 50%. This, this, this, this, this, and this wasn't vandalism. A few of the users you reverted are admins. You need more practice first. --Bongwarrior (talk) 11:17, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

He posted a thread on ANI. Cenarium^Talk 11:42, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

I noticed, but thank you very much for letting me know. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 11:44, 18 April 2008 (UTC)