Boooooom

Freemasonry

For the record, I do not appreciate hostile editors abusing wikipedia and threating to ban people for "edit wars" which you started. Wikipedia has made itself a very complex place filled with an unbelievable bureaucracy, and editors who work in gangs to make sure articles agree with them. I realize this is intentional on the part of editors to scare away new users, but its not going to work on me. Remember that 3 revert edit war rule? You would be part of it, so if you keep doing it you also would have a ban. AnotherObserver (talk) 02:16, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)