Bramhesh Patil

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, Bramhesh Patil, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to JAXA seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Auric talk 10:51, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

September 2017

Hello, I'm Dawnseeker2000. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to List of Indian satellites seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dawnseeker2000 17:07, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

Hello, I'm Batternut. I noticed that you recently removed content from Pune without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Batternut (talk) 09:12, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

February 2018

Hello, I'm Dhtwiki. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Kalidas Jayaram, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Dhtwiki (talk) 22:26, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

June 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Sanskrit, you may be blocked from editing. Abecedare (talk) 18:11, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Disruptive editing and modifying other's comment

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles like following at Chandrayaan-2, you may be blocked from editing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chandrayaan-2&type=revision&diff=848241775&oldid=848148513

Also never modify comments by other users to change their meaning WP:TPO like you did here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABramhesh_Patil&type=revision&diff=848306205&oldid=848245135

Ohsin 03:03, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

August 2018

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Rajput, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. utcursch | talk 16:29, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2019

Hello, I'm Brown Chocolate. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Chandrayaan-2, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Brown Chocolate (talk) 15:35, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

January 2020

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Shivaji. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 16:03, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Alivardi (talk) 09:47, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Shivaji, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 09:55, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Shivaji. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. personal opinions on relevancy are not ideal. GreaterPonce665 (talk) 13:17, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Maharana Pratap, you may be blocked from editing. Alivardi (talk) 14:10, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm GreaterPonce665. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Hambirrao Mohite have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. GreaterPonce665 (talk) 23:06, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Prithviraj Chauhan. utcursch | talk 14:30, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

July 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Shivaji. Alivardi (talk) 14:12, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Important Notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Vengeance 01 (talk) 12:11, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Note - I'm leaving this alert on multiple other editors to make sure everyone is aware that editor behavior is closely watched on these articles. Vengeance 01 (talk) 12:11, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

October 2021

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Shivaji, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. RegentsPark (comment) 12:52, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

You appear to be exclusively marking your edits as minor. Please be careful. --RegentsPark (comment) 12:53, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your valuable suggestion! I'll keep this in mind! Bramhesh Patil (talk) 14:22, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

WP:BLP

Please do not smear academics with polemical labels etc. TrangaBellam (talk) 20:17, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

The source comes from an infamous anti-Hindu/India "historian". I've no hate but am opposing the hate of others. Citing a western historian doesn't prove the "academic" source's reliability. You need to show a neutral source, which doesn't peddle any narrative Bramhesh Patil (talk) 20:27, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

And, who adjudges the neutrality? Please consult WP:HISTRS. TrangaBellam (talk) 07:46, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

• You need to take TrangaBellam's warning above seriously. These two (identical) edit summaries, attacking an academic writer, are completely unacceptable. Please cease your tendentious editing and respect Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. We don't want your opinion, or my opinion, in either articles or edit summaries. And you don't get to attack living people here on your own talkpage either, as you do with your "infamous anti-Hindu/India 'historian'" Bishonen | tålk 21:03, 31 January 2022 (UTC).

February 2022

Hello, I'm Fowler&fowler. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Varanasi have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Those sentences (and the precise phrasing within the sentences) that you attempted to change are cited to some of the best-known scholarly sources. Please examine the history to view how much effort went into the paraphrasing. You may start a discussion on the article's talk page if you must. Best Fowler&fowler«Talk» 13:58, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi Bramhesh Patil! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Varanasi that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Dāsānudāsa (talk) 14:51, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Maurya Empire, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 18:56, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ashoka, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Dāsānudāsa (talk) 14:28, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

• Please do not add Devnagari text; see WP:INDICSCRIPT. Thanks. Kiran_891 ^(TALK) 17:13, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022

Hello, I'm Kiran891. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Thanjavur Maratha kingdom seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kiran_891 ^(TALK) 17:16, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Maratha Empire, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.

> They have made threats against User:Adhonorium and promised to vandalize wikipedia in certain situations.. See here Kiran_891 ^(TALK) 17:23, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nanga Parbat. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Please note that the NPOV terms for the sub-regions of disputed Kashmir region by a long-standing, and hard-won, consensus on Wikipedia are "X-administered," not "X-occupied." So, for example, you would not say, "Jammu and Kashmir (union territory) is India-occupied, only India-administered. I have therefore reverted your edit describing Gilgit-Baltistan to be "Pakistan-occupied." As you seem to have engaged others on that page in edit-warring, please consider this to be both a first and a final warning. Please do not do this again, unless you are contemplating blocks and bans. Best regards, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 07:31, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Kiran_891 ^(TALK) 18:10, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Personal attack block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for Personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per a complaint at WP:AN. For 'apparently Hindu-phobic editor' and the promise to do vandalism to articles about the Mughals. EdJohnston (talk) 18:56, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 16:12, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

April 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Black Kite (talk) 10:26, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

I'm "indefinitely blocked" by a Wikipedia moderator for "disruptive editing" but in reality, I was actually trying to correct a grammatical error in the Kashmir Files page & the Wikipedia editor malfunctioned. Backspacing would cause the cursor to appear at another place & clicking on a citation would open the "discard edit?" pop-up. Please unblock me. Bramhesh Patil (talk) 07:56, 12 April 2022 (UTC)