Reverts

edit

Why are you reverting constructive edits then leaving {{uw-vandalism}} notices? C F A 💬 04:56, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

Why do you think the edit to Brown Boy is incorrect? There are multiple topics by this name. The target is not the only use of this, even by the same artist indicated at the target, who has multiple different topics also called "Brown Boy". -- 64.229.88.34 (talk) 04:56, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

ANI

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. C F A 💬 05:00, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

And exactly what the hell is wrong with it? Do not not think one could be looking for Little Brown Jugette ?

-- 64.229.88.34 (talk) 05:02, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

What is up with you? Why wouldn't Little Brown Jugette not be confusable with Little Brown Jug ? -- 64.229.88.34 (talk) 05:02, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

More senseless, unfounded reverts

edit

Reposted here from my Talk page:

August 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm Brayan Waelchi. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Chemise have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Brayan Waelchi (talk) 04:58, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

August 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm Brayan Waelchi. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Chemise have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Brayan Waelchi (talk) 04:58, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have no idea what you are up to, but both of these are valid edits with explicit edit summaries.
1. The WP:MOS instructs against gratuitous bolding in the 1st sentence of the lead (and anywhere thereafter).
2. Who? Who is this person? Why should we care, listen to, or trust them? A context for their notability is essential, as is a *citation* supporting the quote and claim.
Thankfully someone else has already reverted your unwarranted and ill-considered reversions. 2601:196:180:DC0:E8B9:341A:CE82:54BC (talk) 05:04, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
they have been globally locked. Likely a bot or troll considering their user page. 172.59.210.195 (talk) 05:09, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

question

edit

who is this user a sock of? Cswqssx (talk) 13:15, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

According to the ANI discussion, check out Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hamish Ross -- 64.229.88.34 (talk) 15:10, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply