Massimo Faggioli

edit

Talk:History of the Knights of Columbus#Massimo Faggioli. Not to let issues linger forever but I thought I'd just wait another week or two to see if anyone wants to say anything about this. If not, I think it should be removed partly because among other things, it is just a single source for a fairly strong claim. Novellasyes (talk) 20:25, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

I don't feel terribly strongly about it either way. Be bold! --Slugger O'Toole (talk) 22:32, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Khymani James for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Khymani James is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khymani James until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

User:Sawerchessread (talk) 21:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Changes in Rent control page

edit

Are you aware of the discussions in the talk page? Or you just simply deleted the edits as a matter of ideological bias? Cheers, 139.47.66.252 (talk) 15:20, 3 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

You have been reverted several times. If you want to make this edit, the appropriate place to discuss it is on the article's talk page, not mine. --Slugger O'Toole (talk) 18:30, 3 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Lawrence G. Costanzo for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lawrence G. Costanzo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lawrence G. Costanzo (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 21:49, 12 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Precious anniversary

edit
Precious
 
Four years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:55, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to participate in a research

edit

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC) Reply

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

edit

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC) Reply

No consensus

edit

There's no consensus whatsoever in the rent control talk pages. 81.0.34.0 (talk) 08:38, 14 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Prudential Center (shopping mall), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page OFM.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 16 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply