Bruno Henrique Lima Vieira de Melo

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bitcoin Anonymity (July 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bitcoin Anonymity and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bitcoin Anonymity, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KJP1 (talk) 06:46, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Special measures apply to cryptocurrency related pages

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.

Hello, Bruno Henrique Lima Vieira de Melo. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the blockchain and cryptocurrencies. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

MER-C 09:32, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bruno Henrique Lima Vieira de Melo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. Place any further information here. Bruno Henrique Lima Vieira de Melo (talk) 15:20, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Without your IP, there is nothing we can do to help. You can find your public IP by googling "What is my ip?", or by visiting https://whatismyip.com. If you would like to provide it more privately, you may use WP:UTRS. SQL^{Query me!} 16:44, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bruno Henrique Lima Vieira de Melo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My Public IPv4 is: 179.179.110.132. I am from Brazil and I am trying to publish an article about the anonymity of bitcoin and I was blocked. Bruno Henrique Lima Vieira de Melo (talk) 21:11, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

That IP address is not blocked. Are you sure that's what whatismyip told you? Yamla (talk) 21:14, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of Hack for Humanity (hackathon) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hack for Humanity (hackathon) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hack for Humanity (hackathon) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 06:16, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018

As you have refused to stop, I have now blocked you indefinitely. Any admin may unblock you if you demonstrate you have read and understood our core policies and can explain why your existing contributions, including the deleted contributions, were inappropriate. You'll also need to explain how your future contributions would be different. WP:GAB explains how to craft an unblock request. This block is indefinite but is meant to last only until you have demonstrated an understanding. --Yamla (talk) 13:09, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Okay. I'm sorry for any inconvenience. I get it. Now I know the policies of wikipedia.--Bruno Henrique Lima Vieira de Melo (talk) 13:46, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Great. So, follow the instructions I gave you. --Yamla (talk) 14:24, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bruno Henrique Lima Vieira de Melo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I ended up excluding a discussion on my talk page that talked about what could not be done on wikipedia and that I could be blocked. But I ended up excluding this discussion and did not know it would block me. After this I researched and actually saw the wikipedia policies and I'm already aware. I strongly urge my unblocking so I can edit a page that I created myself. My contributions were excluded because of a number of factors, such as a lack of reliable sources that could actually confirm the fact of the text, an attempt to recreate previously deleted page, and other irregularities according to wikipedia policy. My future contributions and editions will be carried out with the utmost care to be in accordance with the policy of wikipedia, avoiding vandalism and wrong attitudes. Thank you!--Bruno Henrique Lima Vieira de Melo (talk) 23:36, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Sorry, but I agree with Yamla's comment below. I'm concerned that you do not appear to understand why the articles you created were not appropriate for an encyclopedia. One reason I can see is that they read more like essays than Wikipedia articles, based on your own opinions and stringing together a number of strands which are apparently attempting to support your editorial direction. They might make, for example, good college papers, but they're not encyclopedia articles. An encyclopedia article essentially just summarizes what reliable sources say, and does not synthesize or editorialize at all, and does not try to bring different strands together to support a conclusion. Your (now deleted) Hack for Humanity (hackathon) for article, for example. Its not about a single subject called Hack for Humanity, it's a collection of loosely connected thoughts and ideas, all used to say what's good about that hackathon. The Bitcoin one is similar. Please have a good read of Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, especially sections 2.2 and 2.3, and then feel free to make a new unblock request if you feel you can convince a reviewing admin that you understand how Wikipedia works and how Wikipedia articles should be written. Also, before launching straight into creating new articles, a commitment to spend some time working on updating existing articles my be more persuasive in the unblock stakes. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:54, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

None of the pages you created were appropriate and it worries me that you think they were, that you want to be unblocked so you can edit them. --Yamla (talk) 21:37, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Bitcoin Anonymity

Hello, Bruno Henrique Lima Vieira de Melo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bitcoin Anonymity".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 03:22, 16 June 2019 (UTC)