User talk:Buidhe/Archive 14

Archive 10

←

Archive 12

Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15

Archive 16

→

Archive 20

Francoist Spain and the Holocaust

Inspired by your excellent article on Turkey, I've destubbed the article Francoist Spain and the Holocaust. If you get the chance to give it a look over at some point, I'd be grateful! I am certainly not an expert on the subject. —Brigade Piron (talk) 22:00, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks! If you have a minute, could you also add a brief summary to International response to the Holocaust#Turkey? —Brigade Piron (talk) 11:31, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Brigade Piron Sure, I'll do that. Your input may be helpful on Talk:Turkey and the Holocaust where another editor is arguing for the inclusion of Stanford Shaw (basically a work of fiction) and arguing that Varlık Vergisi is not an anti-Jewish law. (t · c) buidhe 12:13, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. I'm tempted to have a go at an article on Sweden and the Holocaust too. Ideally it'd be great to have a series of similar articles dealing with Switzerland, Portugal, and Japan which I know have been covered at some length in the scholarly literature. We are still missing an article on The Holocaust in the Netherlands (currently a redirect) but that's a rather more demanding subject than I can manage. —Brigade Piron (talk) 16:40, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Apparently there is an entire book called "Early Holocaust Memory in Sweden"[1]... Good luck! (t · c) buidhe 16:42, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

oh

Oh, I see you're really active in editing Holocaust-related articles. Well that's a coincidence.OneOffUserName (talk) 15:18, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Jens-Christian Wagner

On 16 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jens-Christian Wagner, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that memorial director Jens-Christian Wagner blames Alternative for Germany for the increase in heckling at former Nazi concentration camps in recent years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jens-Christian Wagner. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Jens-Christian Wagner), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of In Praise of Blood

Hello! Your submission of In Praise of Blood at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SL93 (talk) 03:12, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Editing hooks

I thought it was proper to edit hooks. And the one in question did call out for those inlines.

User:Casliber - since I see you above - am I wrong? Ty.

--2603:7000:2143:8500:8C2A:84CA:D15B:3FEC (talk) 09:11, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

• I prefer if my proposed hooks are not edited. Although it wouldn't be wrong to link Armenian Genocide and antisemitism in Turkey in that one, such linking may draw clicks away from the featured article. (t · c) buidhe 09:14, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

• I believe the featured article is bolded. Beyond that, I believe it is our goal to aid the reader. With normal wp inlining. That trumps trying to drive up the click number, to hit some magic number.

Your second link btw was better than mine, of course.

And I am still asking if there is a rule against editing hooks. I thought not. And that there was not "ownership". But perhaps Casliber knows. Ty. 2603:7000:2143:8500:8C2A:84CA:D15B:3FEC (talk) 09:17, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

There has been discussion on this in the past. Years ago I'd have had the three links in the hook, but more recently people have felt more srtongly about fewer links. I never had a strong enough opinion to push the point. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:45, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Best practices

I started a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#Is_the_term_War_crime_neutral?_Should_it_be_referenced? you may be interested in to get community's input on what best practices would be in this case. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:33, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

"Pearls before swine" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Pearls before swine. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 17#Pearls before swine until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:56, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Private communications with author of IPOB

Buidhe, this suggests that private communications between you and the author of IPOB may have taken place: [2]. If so, please disclose them to me. Given the potentially sensitive content, you may use my email address if necessary. Thank you.Saflieni (talk) 09:40, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

• Saflieni I did not receive any private communications. My email address is disabled, as you can tell. I directed her to an administrator.[3] (t · c) buidhe 09:43, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Interesting. So they had email contact and the next day he blocked me without disclosing that information. Thanks.Saflieni (talk) 10:07, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
    • That is probably because EdJohnston blocked you for reasons that had zero to do with Judi Rever and 100% to do with PAs and a continuing failure to WP:LISTEN. HouseOfChange (talk) 14:30, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Microsoft Store (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Microsoft Store (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:20, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Requesting some article expansion support

Greetings,

Please do have a look at Draft:Turkish textbook controversies and do help article expansion if topic interests you.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 09:59, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Susan Thomson

Hello! Your submission of Susan Thomson at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! AviationFreak💬 03:22, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Jupiter FAR

Hello. The Jupiter article review could use another opinion what do you think of the how the article is written. Can you understand it as a layman? LittleJerry (talk) 20:30, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Minnesota History

Want to say: your welcome. I think I have very nearly completed the damage I going to inflict on Wikipedia. Along the way most all the comments I have run into have been either smart, snide, or both, so yours was a surprise. I happen to know a little Minnesota military history so it was easy. Fort Snelling, Fort Ridgely, Fort Ripley, and St. Paul were the other Minnesota efforts. Thank you again.Mcb133aco (talk) 03:28, 23 January 2021 (UTC)mcb133acoMcb133aco (talk) 03:28, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

I put your comment on my talk page so you will be getting a notice from Wikipedia. Its as good as a Barnstar in my book.Thank you againMcb133aco (talk) 22:31, 23 January 2021 (UTC)mcb133acoMcb133aco (talk) 22:31, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

I would guess that you are a member of the Minnesota project while I am not. I will give this to you to share as you see fit. In editing Fort Snelling I came across the word Bdote. It is being used in place of Mendota. I used the word M'dota and that did not go well. After a great deal of reading I can not find that word or spelling in the historical record until after 2005. I have gone to the Native American Dept. @ U of M, reached out to the Shakopee Mdewakanton, Mendota Mdewakanton, Lower Sioux @ Morton and the MHS about the use on Bdote in place of Mendota and none have replied. The online Dakota Dictionary lists Mendota as a "secondary" spelling of B'dote. John March the first school teacher at the Fort in 1820s made a Dakota Dictionary as did the Pond brothers in the 1830s. No one is citing their work for the word. The MHS started adding the word to their signage at the Fort Snelling Park in 2017 I believe and now do not use the word Mendota. I specifically asked the MHS when the word Bdote is first found in the historical record. No reply. The use of the word Bdote should have at least a qualifier explaining its use in the Fort Snelling article. MHS has now published several works with the word in the title. Without previous publication I think the MHS fits the description of a self publisher by Wikipedia standards. The MHS has a mandate to preserve history not be an revisionist or activist repository. Another editor informed me that Dakota is a "living" Language. That may be true, history is history and Mendota is in the record Bdote is not until the MHS added it.Mcb133aco (talk) 22:31, 23 January 2021 (UTC)mcb133acoMcb133aco (talk) 22:31, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

• Mcb133aco, I'm actually from Seattle and have only been to Minnesota once, and I'm not involved in the wikiproject. I noticed your work because I keep an eye on featured article reviews.
• As for names, there are alternate dialects, spellings, and orthographies for many Native American languages, and it's quite possible that the same Dakota word could be spelled B'dote or M'dota depending on the dialect or orthography used. I checked MHS (I assume you mean Minnesota Historical Society?) and it's definitely a legitimate institution, not a self-published source like a personal blog. I would say they are reliable for this type of information. (t · c) buidhe 22:52, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:League of Legends lore

Hello, Buidhe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "League of Legends lore".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:40, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Why are you deleting images in commons???

I'm talking about the Holocaust in Libya. You already caused one image to be removed and nominated another one for deletion. At least are you planning to replace them or what? It's not an improvement of the article, you know.--Watchlonly (talk) 23:51, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Watchlonly, Avoiding copyvio is important. In order to use an image we have to show that it is available under a free license. If that cannot be shown, images should be removed. (t · c) buidhe 23:58, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Those images are from Yad Vashem for the public. Also they were taken in the 40s! (which means they are under free licence anyway, since more than 70 years have passed since the pictures were taken).--Watchlonly (talk) 00:12, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Watchlonly, That's not how it works. In most European countries it is 70 years since the photographer died, or if the photographer is unknown 70 years since *publication* (rather than creation). The origin country for these photographs is certainly not Israel so Israeli copyright law is irrelevant. (t · c) buidhe 00:18, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Thanks, Buidhe, I am glad to be working with you. I mostly edit BLPs (or other biographies) so IPOB has been a difficult experience. Gratefully! HouseOfChange (talk) 02:24, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Books & Bytes - Issue 42

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 42, November – December 2020

• New EBSCO collections now available
• 1Lib1Ref 2021 underway
• Library Card input requested
• Libraries love Wikimedia, too!

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:01, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for In Praise of Blood

On 27 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article In Praise of Blood, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the book In Praise of Blood was described as "an immediate, destabilizing influence on the world of orthodox Rwandan scholarship"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/In Praise of Blood. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, In Praise of Blood), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Move review for British Admiralty

An editor has asked for a Move review of British Admiralty. Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. Necrothesp (talk) 13:34, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Armenian Genocide denial

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Armenian Genocide denial you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:22, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Nuremberg Military Tribunals ngram.png

Thanks for uploading File:Nuremberg Military Tribunals ngram.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 23:45, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Barnstar of Merit for WikiProject Europe

		The Barnstar of European Merit
		A(nother?) barnstar for your work on the darkest episode European history, and especially for appearing at TFA twice in the same month. You're awe inspiring. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 13:18, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
		this WikiAward was given to {{subst:PAGENAME}} by ~~~ on ~~~~~

TFA

Thank you today for the article about The Holocaust in Slovakia, about "an unfortunate episode in Slovak history" "when its German-allied government deported most of its Jewish population, actually paying Germany for the privilege"! - I like to see giant art by a Serbian artist pictured on the same page, Vision. - my vision. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:35, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Congratulations on making the Main Page. It is a grim episode, to be sure, but one well-covered. Thank you again, as WikiProject Germany Coordinator. To many more articles, Good, Featured, and beyond. –Vami♜_IV♠ 12:52, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Another thank you for this accessible and important article, wow. I can only imagine how much research and effort went into it. Sincerely, Ovinus (talk) 15:08, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

... and today again, for Hitler's prophecy, "about the most notorious phrase from Hitler's speeches: "If international finance Jewry inside and outside Europe should succeed in plunging the nations once more into a world war, the result will be not the Bolshevization of the earth and thereby the victory of Jewry, but the annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe.""! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:36, 30 January 2021 (UTC) - Just yesterday, I wrote about an exhibition in Vienna about Arik Brauer's life and work, help welcome, good obit from the Jewish Museum Vienna. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:40, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for the close of the actor's RfC. The article comes with an edit notice which is no longer correct, - can you please remove it? I don't want to get into those nettles ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:04, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Cary Grant infobox close

Please open the discussion back up. You made a page move and another edit at 02:47, then closed the Cary Grant infobox discussion without an explanation, which editors have discussed at length in this discussion and for years beforehand, at 02:49. I take your work as good faith but the two-minute close and write-up seems enough reason to reopen and let a long-time admin take adequate time to analyze the discussion and the issue. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 04:45, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Randy Kryn, The consensus is pretty clear, so I don't see the value in typing out an elaborate rationale. Most editors in the discussion see value in an infobox. The discussion was allowed to run more than the minimum seven days, and the opposers were unable to convince enough other editors of their point. (t · c) buidhe 05:26, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Careful with ref names

Hi! Your edit here introduced a duplicate ref name error. (Search for 'error:' in the revisions before and after your edit.) I have since fixed this error. --Palosirkka (talk) 12:31, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

English Wikipedia user using alternate account to call Polish Wikipedia editors to Axis Powers

Something New Came up https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#English_Wikipedia_user_using_alternate_account_to_call_Polish_Wikipedia_editors_to_Axis_Powers — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1970:5F5B:EA00:D52F:7857:D518:8E3C (talk) 14:00, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Denial of Violence

On 1 February 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Denial of Violence, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in Denial of Violence, Fatma Müge Göçek argues that Armenian Genocide denial is one of the ideological foundations of the Turkish nation-state? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Denial of Violence. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Denial of Violence), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:01, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Susan Thomson

On 1 February 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Susan Thomson, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Canadian citizen Susan Thomson had her passport confiscated and spent five weeks in "re-education" in 2006 due to her ethnographic research in Rwanda? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Susan Thomson. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Susan Thomson), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Sokolovsky (surname)

added a link pointing to Mikhail Sokolovsky

Suzanne Lenglen

added a link pointing to Le Petit Journal

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Sources on ASALA topic

I urge you to review my sources below before making assumptions:

United States Department of State. Patterns of Global Terrorism Report: 1989, p 57

EU and Member States' policies and laws on persons suspected of terrorism-related crimes" (PDF). EU Parliament Directorate General for Internal Policies of the Union. December 2017.

The Armenian Secret Army for the Liberation of Armenia: A Continuing International Threat" (PDF). CIA Archives.

CIA Terrorism Review 1983" (PDF).

Australia: New progress in Turkish officials' martyrdom". Retrieved 6 January 2021.

The militant organization is referred to as a "terrorist organization" in some instances. United States Department of State classified ASALA militant group as a terrorist organization in their 1989 report archived by National Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism. ASALA militant group is described as a "Marxist-Leninist Armenian terrorist group formed in 1975."

European Union Parliament referred to ASALA militant organization as a secular terrorist group active in Belgium during 70s and 80s.

CIA referred to ASALA militant members as terrorists and ASALA militant organization as a continuing International Threat in January of 1984. Terrorism Analysis Branch of CIA wrote the following sentences in their report on January 1984: "ASALA poses a growing threat to a number of US policy interests.", "... several West European nations have apparently reached accommodations with ASALA, allowing the terrorists freedom to pursue Turkish targets in exchange for promises not to attack indigenous citizens.", "The Turks have responded angrily against what they see as European indifference to or connivance with ASALA terrorism" quoted from the unclassified CIA documents.

ASALA militants are also mentioned in CIA's Terrorism Review report. The following quote is mentioned in Armenian Terrorism section of 29 September 1983 dated Terrorism Review of CIA: "Armenian terrorists pose a growing international threat."

ASALA's last attack, on 19 December 1991, targeted the bullet-proof limousine carrying the Turkish Ambassador to Budapest. The ambassador was not injured in the attack, which was claimed by ASALA in Paris. Since this attack, the militant organization is considered not active thus USA or UK do not include ASALA in their list of foreign terrorist organizations anymore.

The majority of the investigations in the Western countries where the attacks took place were inconclusive and the cases remained unresolved. Australian government told the media that they reopened their investigation into the 1980 assassination of two Turkish diplomats made by ASALA. 1 million Australian Dollar reward is offered by the Australian government for the capture of the perpetrators of the assassination on the occasion of 39th anniversary of the 1980 assassinations.

Therefore it can be seen that there are reliable and enough sources regarding western countries opposing militant group ASALA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yukon198 (talk • contribs) 13:48, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Yukon198, None of these sources say that ASALA considered EU, US etc. an enemy, or was waging a campaign against them. It is WP:OR to conflate terrorist listing with being an enemy. The infobox for Provisional Irish Republican Army only includes the organizations that the IRA fought against, not all the various countries that declared it a terrorist group. (t · c) buidhe 14:02, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Your user page

Hi Buidhe, your user page [4] gives the impression (at least I thought so at first) that you are claiming authorship of all these articles, but you didn't write all of them. It is not a big deal, just letting you know of the first impression people might have. - GizzyCatBella🍁 15:59, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

GizzyCatBella, Actually, I am the main contributor to every one of those articles listed. (t · c) buidhe 16:03, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Yeah, that’s okay, I guess, good work Buidhe, honestly, good work. - GizzyCatBella🍁 16:09, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Buidhe, what's going on here? [5]? Slow down. Discuss please before removing sourced data.. come on Buidhe. - GizzyCatBella🍁 23:26, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

"Caddy" requested move

You closed this requested move as consensus to move. Looking over the discussion, I'm not seeing a consensus here in the discussion. I would like you to either change your closing to no consensus and revert the move, or relist the discussion at requested moves. Rreagan007 (talk) 01:35, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

• With requested moves, I always consider the strength of arguments as well as the number of !votes. In this case, supporters of the move made more compelling arguments with more basis in quantitative data. Furthermore, if it's true that there is a primary topic, that should be easy to prove with a dab test as suggested by one editor during the move. (t · c) buidhe 02:37, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Well, I disagree with your assessment of consensus for this move. So as a friendly heads up, I plan on listing this requested move at Wikipedia:Move_review in the near future. Rreagan007 (talk) 04:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Misogyny

I have opened a section on the talk page. Please have a look. Love, 46.221.87.49 (talk) 11:17, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Can you tell me why you deleted my GA nomination for Ink wash painting? Thank you.

Can you tell me why you deleted my GA nomination for Ink wash painting? Thank you. --Jujiang (talk) 14:48, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Jujiang, If I hadn't done it, Legobot would have overwritten your addition to the list. You need to follow the WP:Good article instructions by putting the correct template on Talk:Ink wash painting and the bot will take care of the rest. (t · c) buidhe 14:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. Is this done? --Jujiang (talk) 15:19, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Jujiang, Yes. (t · c) buidhe 15:37, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. --Jujiang (talk) 15:57, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Paramilitary punishment attacks in Northern Ireland

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Paramilitary punishment attacks in Northern Ireland you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HJ Mitchell -- HJ Mitchell (talk) 23:01, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Threshold for killing all Tigrayans: above 4 yrs, 7 yrs or 14 yrs? males only or all genders?

I think that the clearest evidence for intent in the War crimes in the Tigray War may come from testimony regarding the age limit above which to kill all male or all any-gender Tigrayans, but this is just my personal guess. The age limit may be ambiguous, but it sounds very much like an order from above.

You may wish to keep an eye on the article. It seems to me impossible for these to be only classed as war crimes in the long run, but whether they are legally classified as crimes against humanity or genocide will clearly be a long-term question that will depend on how lawyers, evidence and judges in courts handle the issue. Right now there's the "final phase" of the "military" battles going on, per EEPA, and there don't seem to be reports about whether Eritrean extermination of Tigrayan civilians is continuing. Boud (talk) 03:04, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sokolovsky (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mikhail Sokolovsky.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

I comment on you here

[6] - GizzyCatBella🍁 09:20, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

RE: Love for Sale FAC

Please offer any further comments here if you have any, on your previous point, any other concern, or the article as a whole. Thank you. isento (talk) 07:20, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Congratulations

Your DYK hook about human rights lawyer Susan Thomson and her five weeks of "re-education" received 8,014 page views (668 per hour) while on the Main Page. It is the one of most viewed hooks during the month of February and has thus earned a place on the February stats list. Keep up the great work! Cbl62 (talk) 17:25, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Removal of Gabrielle Ormand

I have no problem with removing Gabrielle Ormond from the list of French supercentenarians for lack of proper references. What I have a problem with is how the table was left: a gap between entry 70 & 72; not renumbered for her deletion, and without providing a new “100th” entry to make the list complete. Would you please go back and make these fixes. Thank you.TFBCT1 (talk) 20:19, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Sentinel-class cutters

Thank you for your removal of the hull number from the name of the article USCGC Robert Yered. I am working on a proposed list class article about the Sentinel-class cutters and this will make the creation of the list article much easier. I contemplated doing much the same actions that you have completed but was unsure of how to proceed. I hope that you will continue with the rest of the class! Thank you so much! Cuprum17 (talk) 16:19, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

• Cuprum17, You're welcome! The only way to complete such moves is if you are a pagemover, which you can request at WP:PERM. If you don't have that permission, you can easily request them at WP:RM/TR if you don't expect them to be contested. I made these moves because Llammakey listed them there. (t · c) buidhe 16:25, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

I could use your elegant assistance on USCGC Joseph Napier (WPC-1115), if you wouldn't mind. Somehow it was missed in the edit of redirects. All of the rest of the existing articles have been redirected. Thank you again!!! Cuprum17 (talk) 16:38, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Cuprum17, Now  Done (t · c) buidhe 16:44, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Cuprum17 (talk) has given you some popcorn. Popcorn is crunchy goodness, and is wonderfully delicious!

Thank you so much, your edits made my edits so much easier!!!!

To spread the goodness of popcorn, you can add {{subst:Popcorn}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message.

Armenian Genocide denial

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Armenian Genocide denial has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

There are a couple of issues I found that I'll draw to your attention that I feel need to be fixed:

Germany: Stories about Armenians were censored, although penalties were light. I assume newspapers censored the stories because of some action on the part of the German government?}} Needs clarification.

United States: In 2019, Congress formally recognized the genocide. How? With a resolution? Clarify.

United Kingdom: In 2001, the United Kingdom initially refused to invite Armenian Genocide survivors to an official commemorative event of the first Holocaust Memorial Day, which included survivors of several genocides, but later relented. Why? Elaborate.

In 2005, the Turkish National Assembly demanded an apology for the 1916 publication… From whom?

Best of luck with the FA when you get to it.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 16:20, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, Buidhe. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 22:32, 13 February 2021 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Vanamonde (Talk) 22:32, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Vanamonde93, I'm sorry, which address did you use? I currently use the throwaway account fiamh@protonmail.com and would prefer you address any Wikipedia-related emails there. (t · c) buidhe 22:38, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

I replied to a conversation we had in December 2019; I imagine you don't want me to post the email address here, but it was one you had attached to Wikipedia at that time. I can forward the email. Best, Vanamonde (Talk) 22:47, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, I don't even remember what email address I was using then... (t · c) buidhe 22:52, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Christian ethics

I just wanted to say thank you. Your input is always valuable. I think I have directly attributed all quotes, or removed them, now. Thanx again. Jenhawk777 (talk) 05:13, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks. I made a silly mistake AfDing a redirect that was already RfDd. Sorry! Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:50, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

• No problem! (t · c) buidhe 08:51, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Antonio Martínez RM

Following the Antonio Martínez (footballer) → Antonio Martínez (footballer, born 1977) RM, please can you fix the broken links? GiantSnowman 17:24, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Done (t · c) buidhe 18:46, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Your reverts on Welsh fiscal deficit (Political bias tag)

Before editing this article again, please discuss on the Talk page. Cell Danwydd (talk) 10:27, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

• Cell Danwydd In the same spirit I ask you to self-revert until you can find reliable sources directly related to the topic to cite all information as required by WP:RS and WP:OR. (t · c) buidhe 10:30, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Comparison of Nazism and Stalinism page

It seems like somebody added a lot of random pictures to the page that do not seem like they belong and are out of context you may want to take a look at it when you can. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Comparison_of_Nazism_and_Stalinism&action=history — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.62.96.220 (talk) 14:59, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Victim nationalism

Hello, Buidhe. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Victim nationalism, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Armenian Genocide denial

The article Armenian Genocide denial you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Armenian Genocide denial for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:21, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Armenian Genocide denial

The article Armenian Genocide denial you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Armenian Genocide denial for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:22, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

About peer review

I have responded to you on the American Rescue Plan peer review. I requested copyediting for the article. Is there anymore feedback regarding the article before I request peer review closure? AmericanRescuePlan2021 (talk) 18:13, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

• AmericanRescuePlan2021 I don't have more to say but if you leave it open someone else may come along. (t · c) buidhe 22:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Buidhe, thank you for your feedback on the peer review. I will either keep the peer review open for other people to leave feedbacks or close it once somebody copyedits the article (as I requested). —AmericanRescuePlan2021 (talk) 06:44, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Ermelo

With all due respect, your move of Ermelo resulted in 256 links to disambiguation pages. Could you clean that up? The Banner talk 21:43, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

• Actually I fixed them all right after the move and the dab links tool simply hasn't updated. (t · c) buidhe 23:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Actually, there are still 246 links to the disambiguation page itself. See here. That has nothing to do with the dab tool. The Banner talk 23:53, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

There are "no more links to disambiguate". (t · c) buidhe 23:58, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

That is why it is better to look at the actual disambiguation page and the number of incoming links there. The Banner talk 00:05, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

YGM

Hello, Buidhe. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

–MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 23:25, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Article in need of work

Hi Buidhe — If you by chance have time and the inclination, the article Rosenstrasse protest could stand significant work. Right now, I am otherwise occupied or I'd clean it up myself. Just a suggestion. :-) --Obenritter (talk) 13:53, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Suzanne Lenglen article.png

Thanks for uploading File:Suzanne Lenglen article.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 08:45, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Peer review/American Rescue Plan/archive1

Sorry, but that user won't be coming back to the review... Drmies (talk) 02:16, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Unbalanced div's in RM closure

Hi, Buidhe, this edit, which closed the RM discussion at Talk:Feminizing hormone therapy, added a <div> tag at the top, without a closing end-div tag somewhere. The edit summary mentions DiscussionCloser v.1.7.3, and I'm not sure if the problem lies with that script, or how you used it. Can you look into this, and if there's a problem script-side, can you either ping DannyS712 or call their attention to this problem on their Talk page? If it's in usage, can you provide the bottom-template, or whatever it is the script calls for, so there isn't a missing </div>? This may cause unpredictable behavior in subsequent discussions, if left as is. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 20:23, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

• Hi Mathglot, thanks for letting me know. I believe I've fixed it manually. I use this script on all my RM closures and never had an issue before so I'm guessing it's a one-off thing. (t · c) buidhe 02:03, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

  Follow-up at User talk:DannyS712#Possible DiscussionCloser issue. Mathglot (talk) 03:59, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Sweden and the Holocaust

Hi Buidhe. I have made some progress on the draft article and wondered if you had anything to add? I cannot pretend to know much about the subject so any contributions are gratefully accepted! Hope all is well with you. —Brigade Piron (talk) 10:43, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

• @Brigade Piron: Nice work! It just needs a lead. Would make a good DYK. (t · c) buidhe 10:53, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Peer review peer review

I noticed your edits to Donough MacCarty, 1st Earl of Clancarty so you probably noticed that I did the GA review and award (see Talk:Donough MacCarty, 1st Earl of Clancarty/GA2). That was the first time I have ever done a GAR, so if you have time I would appreciate any advice you may have to offer should I be tempted to do another? Thank you if you do, no worries if you don't. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 16:13, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

• John Maynard Friedman Thanks for reviewing at GAN! I think your review does a good job at sticking to the criteria while providing helpful feedback for the nominator. For example, articles should not have collapsed tables according to MOS:DONTHIDE, but this is not part of the MOS standard required for GAN (although you could have challenged them based on relevance). Here are the issues that I noticed that ideally would be caught by a GA review:
  • I think you should have checked the notes for original research and verifiability; I found some potential issues there. For example, one of the notes states without a citation: "The source does not name the son, but it can be inferred that it was Callaghan, his second son, as his eldest, Cormac, was away in France and Justin was only about nine years old and probably with his mother in France." I realize you flagged this in the review and had it improved, but it is still WP:OR, as in inference not directly stated in the source. There are other issues such as "His first name is usually spelled Donough", which is not cited and does not seem to be verifiable to a direct statement in a reliable source.
  • The lead refers to "Charles I's authoritarian governor", but the word "authoritarian" is not used in the body and does not seem to be cited anywhere. (Words like "authoritarian" are often not suitable for wikivoice either).
  • Some info in the body lacks citations, such as "Despite this family background, Donough and his siblings grew up to be Catholics. It is not known how this came about." "who could, however, not seize them as its power was limited to Dublin and a few other towns and their immediately surroundings, whereas Muskerry's estates lay entirely within the territories held by the rebels." In an article like this it means that there is no obvious source where the reader can verify the info, which is an issue for GA criteria. (t · c) buidhe 17:03, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
    • Thank you, this is helpful. At least I didn't miss anything gross. I pressed the nominator on the first and (especially) the last point, which has become particularly relevant since it is fundamental to his DYK nomination. Nevertheless I think that, given some 'vigorous' editing, the article has the potential to be a Featured Article. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 17:20, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Drive coordination

Hi buidhe and thanks for volunteering to serve as a coordinator. There's no formal guide as to how to co-ordinate, so I thought I'd drop some notes (that you may already know) about drive coordination:

1. Before the drive: banners should be dropped at participants in the last drive and prolific reviewers talk pages--here's a link to the banner from last drive. I'd like to include a line asking people to add themselves to this list for future updates so we can send it as a mass message in the future rather than manually going through. If people are already signed up or unable to participate (retired/blocked/etc), use your best judgement and probably don't leave a message.
2. During the drive: check in on the talk page to answer questions, keep an eye on WT:GAN as well, and (something I didn't do super well last month) if you see new users wanting to get involved maybe drop them a talk page message with advice on how to do a proper review— a drive done right has potential to help people get more involved!
3. After the drive: check reviews to ensure they are decent reviews (if somebody has done 40+ and is an established user, its acceptable to check every few). here's a table we used to help keep track of it last year

I think that's about it. Hope this is helpful, and if you have any questions don't hesitate to reach out. Cheers, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 20:14, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

• Eddie891 Great! I have now made a March 2021 banner: Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/GAN Backlog Drives/March 2021/banner. Do you think it's too early to start dropping it? (t · c) buidhe 20:19, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

  I think it might be a little on the early side-- If memory serves I sent them out in the week leading up to the drive (which for this drive is next week) and Harrias sent messages for April's the weekend before. I was planning to wait until this coming weekend. Cheers, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 20:24, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

  Eddie891, Has the invite been sent out to the mailing list? If so than I can start working on the people who aren't on the list, but I don't want to give the same message twice. (t · c) buidhe 08:07, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

  I haven't sent the mass message yet- the last time that was used was 2013, so I'm curious to hear your thoughts: should we send a message like "Hey, there's a drive" to these people (who, again, won't have gotten a message for seven-ish years), or blank the list and get people to sign-up again if they're interested? Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:25, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

  Eddie891, Why not send it? The worst that can happen is that they've lost interest in GA and won't participate, but these people wouldn't have participated anyway. On the other hand, maybe some will decide to re-engage. (t · c) buidhe 14:30, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

  OK, sent. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:28, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

  I got caught up in other things, apologies. Are there still any messages in need of dropping, or have they all been delivered? Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:55, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

• Eddie891 Nope I took care of it and posted at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Good_articles/GAN_Backlog_Drives/March_2021. (t · c) buidhe 16:02, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

• Great, many thanks! Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:03, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Promotion of International Conference on the Holocaust and Genocide

Congratulations, buidhe! The article you nominated, International Conference on the Holocaust and Genocide, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:08, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

RM of Dave Williams (rugby league)

You've moved a page, but linked some of the previous links to a DAB rather than the new link. Please move them in line with the Dave Williams (rugby league, born 1989). Many thanks in advance.Fleets (talk) 08:06, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

links here for you Fleets (talk) 19:10, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

It looks like Lennart97 has tidied up after you, but please do ensure that when you move a page that you tidy up after yourself as there were several pages that needed fixing after you moved Dave Williams.Fleets (talk) 11:16, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

collective guilt

hi buidhe,

firstly, thank you for improving wiki pages about sensitive topics like genocides, massacres, and racism. i do surf on wiki frequently and i'd like to say that reading your contents is always a good experience. nevertheless, i strongly disagree with this addition (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Seyfo&diff=1009744952&oldid=1009675918). it is problematic in many aspects: representing a certain ethnicity as "genocider" as a whole is insensitive and to be honest, it is disturbing. i have never seen such a thing in other pages about genocides. e.g. despite vast majority of the germans voted for the nazis, we do not and should not represent "germans" as the perpetrator of holocoust or genocider, but instead we say "nazis". same goes for nakba (do we call jewish people as the perpetrator?) or we do not represent ethnic turkish people as a whole as the perpetrator of the greek or armenian genocide, but instead we say "ottoman/young turk government". it's because an ethnicity as a whole cannot be "genocidal". collective guilt justifies collective punishment and that's exactly the same mentality causing genocides which is also a form of collective punishment. besides, it is incorrect in many ways because even if we accept that "whole" sunni muslim kurds are genociders (which is not true), there are millions of alevi kurds, yarsani kurds, kurds from kermanshah, sanandaj, kurds from khorasan who had nothing to do with those massacres against christians. on the top of it, most of the allied tribes were not even independent, they were usually (if not always), under the command of others. there's nothing wrong with pointing the massacres of mainly kurdish hamidiye (cavalry) and its role in the genocides during and just before the ww1 (some scholars associate the mostly kurdish and tribal hamidiye cavalry with mostly kurdish and tribal village guard system), but the current wording has serious problems. in my humble opinion, changing it from "kurds" to "allied local muslim tribes" (mainly kurdish but also circassian, yörük turkmen, and arab) will be good. it is just wrong to call an ethnic group "genocider" as a whole.176.54.241.197 (talk) 07:51, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

okay, since i have received no response from you so far and only a few people join the discussions on the article's talk page, i will raise this on dispute resolution boards of wiki in the next couple of weeks.176.54.241.197 (talk) 14:38, 2 March 2021 (UTC)