Bushido77

This is Bushido77's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Heisner (August 11)

Latest comment: 30 days ago3 comments1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by HistoryTheorist were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Hello Bushido77, thank you for your submission. I am currently rejecting it because the draft, as it currently stands, is written in a semi-promotional tone. Many biographical details do not have in-line citations and the citations used are from non-reliable sources like Family Search, an internet search, and Amazon. You also cite the organization Heisner was associated with which not necessarily a bad thing, but Wikipedia also wants citations from independent sources which give significant biographical details. You may re-submit after you have addressed the issues raised. If you have any questions about what this means, please ask me on my talk page. Have a good day and God bless! ❤History Theorist❤ 20:50, 11 August 2024 (UTC) Sidenote: you could use family search if you cite the specific record which list Heisner's parentsReply

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert Heisner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

❤History Theorist❤ 20:50, 11 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Bushido77! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ❤History Theorist❤ 20:50, 11 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Heisner (August 21)

Latest comment: 20 days ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Jlwoodwa were:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert Heisner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

jlwoodwa (talk) 19:17, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the feedback. I am trying to learn this Wkipedia editing. I am surprised by the "neutral point of view" comment. I ran the article through Grammarly using the formal and academic settings. I will see if I can figure out my problems, and try again. Bushido77 (talk) 19:32, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

If you are using generative AI to write some or all of your draft, you should read WP:LLM. jlwoodwa (talk) 20:18, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. No, I am not using any AI. Just Grammarly, which makes suggested edits based on my settings. I am doing all the writing myself. I set the Grammarly program for "academic" and "formal" which I had hoped would make the article more "encyclopedic." Apparently, I have more to go. Bushido77 (talk) 20:35, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Heisner (August 26)

Latest comment: 16 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ktkvtsh was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert Heisner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ktkvtsh (talk) 01:18, 26 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic