Your submission at Articles for creation: 32768 (June 16)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Illusion Flame was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- πŸ”₯π‘°π’π’π’–π’”π’Šπ’π’ π‘­π’π’‚π’Žπ’† (π’•π’‚π’π’Œ)πŸ”₯ 16:15, 16 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
But,why? ByeBlocks4224 (talk) 16:28, 16 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, ByeBlocks4224! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! - πŸ”₯π‘°π’π’π’–π’”π’Šπ’π’ π‘­π’π’‚π’Žπ’† (π’•π’‚π’π’Œ)πŸ”₯ 16:15, 16 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
But I created a number draft {Stub template} ByeBlocks4224 (talk) 16:31, 16 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
We don’t have or need an article for every number. For the one you requested, it already redirects to 30,000, like all other numbers from that range. It’s just unnecessary. It was also unsourced and contained very little information. - πŸ”₯π‘°π’π’π’–π’”π’Šπ’π’ π‘­π’π’‚π’Žπ’† (π’•π’‚π’π’Œ)πŸ”₯ 16:48, 16 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Also see WP:NUMBER - πŸ”₯π‘°π’π’π’–π’”π’Šπ’π’ π‘­π’π’‚π’Žπ’† (π’•π’‚π’π’Œ)πŸ”₯ 16:50, 16 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
But I put the Num-stub template ByeBlocks4224 (talk) 06:17, 17 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
That doesn’t mean anything. Given your persistence, I encourage you to take a pause and learn about our policies first. Please read WP:RS and WP:NUMBER. - πŸ”₯π‘°π’π’π’–π’”π’Šπ’π’ π‘­π’π’‚π’Žπ’† (π’•π’‚π’π’Œ)πŸ”₯ 10:19, 17 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
It does mean something!!! ByeBlocks4224 (talk) 14:23, 17 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 262144 (June 16)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Illusion Flame was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- πŸ”₯π‘°π’π’π’–π’”π’Šπ’π’ π‘­π’π’‚π’Žπ’† (π’•π’‚π’π’Œ)πŸ”₯ 16:51, 16 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 16384 (June 16)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 17:49, 16 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 524288 (June 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Curbon7 (talk) 08:10, 17 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 524288 (June 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hitro talk 09:13, 17 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 524288 (June 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Alpha3031 was: Β The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Alpha3031 (t β€’ c) 09:44, 17 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 524288 (June 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Alpha3031 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
Alpha3031 (t β€’ c) 09:52, 17 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

June 2023

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:29, 17 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:524288, you may be blocked from editing. KylieTastic (talk) 15:33, 17 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Sorry Im not
Im trying to create number articles that are powers of two. ByeBlocks4224 (talk) 15:41, 17 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
That's not all you're doing. You're attracting exactly the wrong sort of attention. My advice would be to stop now. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:43, 17 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
I have read WP:NUMBER ByeBlocks4224 (talk) 15:42, 17 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Please dont block me(reason above) ByeBlocks4224 (talk) 15:46, 17 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
firefly ( t Β· c ) 15:45, 17 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
How? I am not a sockpuppet. ByeBlocks4224 (talk) 16:01, 17 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Unblock reqest

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ByeBlocks4224 (block log β€’ active blocks β€’ global blocks β€’ contribs β€’ deleted contribs β€’ filter log β€’ creation log β€’ change block settings β€’ unblock β€’ checkuser (log))


Request reason:

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You're going to lose your TPA soon also. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:51, 17 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Unblock request 2

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ByeBlocks4224 (block log β€’ active blocks β€’ global blocks β€’ contribs β€’ deleted contribs β€’ filter log β€’ creation log β€’ change block settings β€’ unblock β€’ checkuser (log))


Request reason:

Decline reason:

Believe it or not, we don't just want you to tell us that you read it, we want you to demonstrate your understanding of it, which you should do from your original account. 331dot (talk) 18:55, 17 June 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock me I have read WP:SOCK ByeBlocks4224 (talk) 16:23, 17 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

UNBLOCK ME3

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ByeBlocks4224 (block log β€’ active blocks β€’ global blocks β€’ contribs β€’ deleted contribs β€’ filter log β€’ creation log β€’ change block settings β€’ unblock β€’ checkuser (log))


Request reason:

I understand WP:SOCK

Decline reason:

Stop wasting our time. Yamla (talk) 19:07, 17 June 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UBR4

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ByeBlocks4224 (block log β€’ active blocks β€’ global blocks β€’ contribs β€’ deleted contribs β€’ filter log β€’ creation log β€’ change block settings β€’ unblock β€’ checkuser (log))


Request reason:

I understand WP:SOCK

Decline reason:

That's quite enough. Talk page access revoked. --jpgordon𝄒𝄆𝄐𝄇 19:53, 17 June 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ByeBlocks4224 (talk) 19:24, 17 June 2023 (UTC)Reply